...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Berbers are primarily not African ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: The actual Taforalt skeletons do not match Iberian skeletons so they do not represent any migrants. [/QUOTE]Caramelli, D; Lalueza-Fox, C; Vernesi, C; Lari, M; Casoli, A; Mallegni, F; Chiarelli, B; Dupanloup, I; Bertranpetit, J (2003). [b] "Evidence for a genetic discontinuity between Neandertals and 24,000-year-old anatomically modern Europeans"[/b] In this study, we typed the hypervariable region I (HVRI) of the mitochondrial genome (360 bp) from the bones of two early a.m.h. of the Cro-Magnon type from Southern Italy. Therefore, this sequence belongs to either haplogroups HV or pre-HV, two haplogroups rare in general but with a comparatively high frequencies among today's Near-Easterners __________________________________ ^^^ xyyman here's the ancestor of H twice as old as that analyzed by Kefi from Morocco. Found in Italy, perhaps oriignally from the Anatolia or the Near East ___________________________________ I think Swenet may have mentioned this before that the origin of the so called Iberomaurusian might not be Iberian because their skeletons are more similar to Northern Europeans than southern Europeans. So in Iberia there may have been both native Iberians and Northern/Central Europeans who sought refuge from the LGM [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3