...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Berbers are primarily not African ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [/QUOTE]All rhetoric No raw data. Take an X-lax pal. You're full of **** with strawmen running out you mouth like diarrhea just inventing all kinds of nonsense. You can't cut and paste any actual words of mine alleging what you say I said. But when you got no raw data to support your claim the only thing you can do against the raw data that was poste is to smear the poster, debaters dirty trick #1. All the goobledeegook you can pull out Felix the Cat's debater's Bag o' Trix are 4 kidz will not, cannot, and does not alter the geneticists' tables i.e., * not their geographic labels, * not their haplogroups, * not their frequencies. It's about the raw data not the textual interpretation which not only varies from geneticist to geneticist but even within a single report sometimes. I will believe my lying eyes over any Slick Rick Shyster everytime. Now more about the subject header not poster personalities. U6 Question: how can an [i]in situ[/i] regional specific 30k hg be foreign? Facts no rhetoric can change: * U6 founder arose in North Africa and has stayed there > ~30,000 years * M1 founder arose in North Africa and has stayed there > ~30,000 years * U6 with minor prehistoric expansion to East Africa. * M1 with major prehistoric expansion to East Africa. Proof you're just shitting around: * you deny E-M81 is East African just because its parent E-M35 is, but * promote U6 as Eurasian only for the reason its parent U is; * you champion E-M81 as North African because autochthonous there, yet * you assail U6 as North African even though autochthonous there. Who can say "logically irrational"? Who can say "special pleading"? Who can say "personal agenda"? Settle yourself down and quit lazying outs from my replies 1st reply to you Without twisting geographies as laid out by the reports themselves I invite you and anyone else who's capable to present raw data from a variety of legitimate studies that show Berbers are not primarily African. I welcome and await it. 2nd reply to you I invite you to post whatever you want about why the geneticists' assignments are wrong but that won't change their published assessments making them conform to your opinion. It will round out the thread and contribute to its robustness. 3rd reply to you Your options: 1 - More impotent rhetoric; not worth my time to further respond 2 - Pertinent info on the subject header; enlightenment from you we all will appreciate. So far you take the lazy way out i.e., option 1 - shitting the bull Don't be jealous of my work produce work of your own you can do it or maybe you can't. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3