...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Berbers are primarily not African ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] I consider "back migration" as a back-to-Africa movement or African coalescence of a basal clade belonging to a haplogroup that itself arose from outside of continental Africa. There are several haplogroups representative of "back migration." They either arose in Africa or [i]en route[/i] to Africa. They either appear only in Africa, have their highest frequencies there, or can be shown to have expanded subclades within Africa or to outside of Africa. In general they are African specific and are not counted as Eurasian "lineages" though they have Eurasian parentage (origin) -- the same as L3M & L3N are not counted as African "lineages" though they, M & N, have African parentage (L3 origin). This distinction is what separates a haplogroup like R-V88 from J-M267. The former is African specific and ranked with African "lineages" whereas the latter, though found in Africa, is Afroasian specific and is an Eurasian "lineage." [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3