...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Berbers are primarily not African ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] Note DNAtribes classed its "basal Eurasian" (whatever that's supposed to be) as non-African even though its origin is Sudan and it expands northward via the Gulf of Aqaba from Sudan to the Levant's Rift and westward from Sudan to Libya and the Maghreb. This is not at all what Sergi proposed. DNAtribes is nothing to write home about unless one thinks beginnings of Sudanis, Egyptians, Libyans, and Maghrebis are non-African but rather "basal Eurasian." Imazighen, by definition, can only have been in Africa since the time there was such a language family as Tamazight. Some definitive components of Imazighen, which are autochthonous thus indigenous in North Africa, can be traced back to the Paleolithic with continuity up to today. Two are mtDNA haplogroups U6 & M1. L3K while not arising in the Maghreb has been there for some 25-30k pending which molecular biologist one references. Consider: autochthonous U6 & M1 birthed in North Africa, with U6 found only in Africa until quite recent times, predates many other haplogroups that also arose in Africa. U6, African specific, is indigenous and just as old if not much older than most other African haplogroups. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3