...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by capra: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: Exactly what do you estimate EEF average in Europeans? According to Pinhasi (2012) the estimates wildly vary from 20-70%. Furthermore I got access to a paper not even yet published [I got the draft] on the genomes of Neolithic Baltics - they are 0% EEF. Some now argue that the Baltic was some sort of special "refuge" area and wasn't affected by incoming agriculturalists, like the rest. However it seems more likely EEF has been over-estimated for the whole Europe.[/QUOTE]I don't know off the top of my head, but probably looking at something more recent than a review paper from 2012 would give you a more accurate estimate. Those Baltic Neolithic genomes are from areas that weren't settled by farmers, so it is not terribly surprising that they don't have EEF ancestry. Keep in mind that in Eastern European nomenclature 'Neolithic' doesn't mean agriculture, it means ceramics. Agriculture didn't show up until Corded Ware; before then it was foragers with pottery. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3