...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: How does this chart defend or justify the use of the term "Basal Eurasian" in African populations? The point about Lazirdis and most of the other researchers defining these terms are that they do not use African populations as part of any refrence population related to EEF (because Africa is filtered out).[/QUOTE]Even if I dropped terms like EEF and Basal Eurasian, you'd still be salty. If I dropped these terms today and said that ancient Egyptians can be partially modeled as Angel's Anatolian and Greek samples, you'd still chimp out. You're just using Lazaridis' labels as a pretext to complain. There, I said it. Ancient Egyptians can be modeled as partly consisting of Angel's Nea Nikomedeian sample. Now what? Still going to do a butthurt conspiracy speech about Lazaridis' terminology even though I'm not even using it in the posts you're supposedly addressing? Everyone knows that the real reason you're salty is because the data doesn't support your version of events: the supposed colonization of the Levant by fictitious farmers from Wadi Kubbaniya whose affinities you're more comfortable with. :rolleyes: [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3