...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by capra: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: What I predict is that sample is not typical at all and EEF will be very low when they get more ancient DNA. The Hofmanova study acknowledges this problem there is only one Early Neolithic sample from Germany... looks like hocus pocus, why not just wait for more samples?[/QUOTE]OK, this is off topic so please take it to Eupedia or Anthrogenica or something, where they will disabuse you of your near-xyyman level of ignorance on this topic. And read "Massive migrations from the steppe" for heaven's sake, catch up to 2014. [/qb][/QUOTE]They're trying to revive old/discredited Aryan theories that Indo-European had a big genetic impact. No thanks. "Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe" http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v522/n7555/full/nature14317.html The main people pushing this nonsense are eastern Europeans for their own self-interests, can just tell with author names on even the study you referenced.... Vayacheslav, Khartanovich, Kuznetsov, Mochalov, :rolleyes: [/qb][/QUOTE]Hmmm, I was in a YouTube thread. And the OP said that a lot of Bulgarians are very angry. The thread was about ancient Egypt. This was about one year ago. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3