...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] @Cass. You seem like a knowledgeable young man. You have an excellent recollection memory. But you need to show sign of intelligence. This is reflected in your analytical ability. Don't you get it. Arnaiz-Villen was correct. San has a large proportion of "Mongoloid" ancestry . He was correct. South Africans are heavily admix with Khoi-San. Are you not keeping up? Remember the meta-population that left Africa are closely related to Onge and Andamans who regardless of what they look like are Asians. Genetically these "negros" are Asians. As many DNA charts have shown, like DNATribes, the closest African population to Asians are.....you guessed it...San. Come on man! Think!!!! Arnaiz-Villen was correct. He was laughed at and ridiculed but DNATribes has shown he was correct 15 years later. "Visuals" are deceptive. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3