...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug: If you don't support the terminology then how can you use it? That is the point.[/QUOTE]The scientific literature comes with all sorts of terms no one person has any control over. Discussing science in public inevitably means using widely adopted jargon you may have caveats with, but which you can't communicate without if you want people to understand you and look up what you're talking about. But we all know you have never had an interest in science. Your interest is infusing anthropology with your pan-African politics, hence, why you're so incompetent despite a decade of posting here. Your politics don't require competence. Just trolling, rhetoric, fallacies and opinionated butthurtness. And luckily your run of propaganda will end soon. Enjoy your misinformation while it lasts. Good quality aDNA from ancient Egyptians will be published soon and all your pretexts and 22ky old farmer fabrications will be exposed for the dumpster juice that they are. [/qb][/QUOTE]Oh. So when you cite an article that had to be updated because of invalid data that is not good science? You taking terms out of context from the papers that defined them using fairly rigid methodologies does not make you "scientific". It means you are running around taking terms out of context and trying to pretend to know more than those who coined the terminology. And more than that you use this armchair science approach, which is fine in general, to try and lecture other folks about science. Come on man. Stop trying to lecture people on science and what words to use out of their mouth. Science is about debating the facts and the facts are that EEF and Basal Eurasian based on how the actual scientists have defined them, make no sense being used in an African context. But sure, lets see if this new paper or ANY new paper suddenly puts Basal Eurasian and EEF into Africa during or after the Neolithic. My guess is they won't say it that way, but who knows. Like I said, I doubt there will be any science showing a similar large scale genetic impact from the Neolithic in Africa as seen in Europe, [b]primarily because of the already present African mixture in the Levant that gave rise to the Neolithic in the first place[/b]. But somehow something tells me you hate that idea.... Not sure why. Just like calling the earliest OOA populations in Eurasia isn't propaganda it is just the facts. Not sure why you hate that either. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3