...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by sudaniya: You really are delusional. The thoroughly debunked and discarded "Hamitic" *myth* will not be making a return in the absense of evidence incontrovertably demonstrating that the ancient Egyptian civilization started in the North and that 'Afro-Asiatic' developed in "Eurasia" instead of the general consensus that it developed in Northeast Africa. You have all your work cut out for you. Your neurotic insistence on ignoring the salient biological affinities of predynastic cultures in Upper Egypt and the near irrelevance of the North is just adorable. :D Your only chance is to provide results proving that Southern Egyptians were "Eurasian". You must have so much grit-edged evidence demonstrating that Southern Egyptians were "Eurasian" at some point prior to the formation of the Egyptian State - in opposition to all the current mainstream evidence on the Badarians and Naqadans. It should be easy, right? [/QUOTE]There is no "general consensus" on the Proto-Afro-Asiatic (PAA) homeland. Keita made a ridiculous remark [like his blunder most Egyptians were the same as Nubians in pigmentation] spammed around by Afrocentrists that the Levant PAA theory is old and discredited. The funny thing is Keita made that statement in an article review of a scholar far more competent than him (Peter Bellwood) who argues for the Levant theory - so its far from dead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Bellwood [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3