...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [QB] [QUOTE]Some migration and admixture are not denied as a part of African biohistory in some regions, but most of the gene flow has been so long ago as to have been reworked by African selection pressures and circumstances, and constitute a part of an African genuine biological history (Hiernaux 1975).[/QUOTE]Funny thing about this is Hiernaux never argued what Keita is arguing, but the opposite: "In this book the emphasis is on sub-Saharan Africa, the specifically African anthropological area. [b]Because North Africa and Egypt belong much more to the Mediterranean and the area of Western Asia than to Africa in that which concerns physical anthropology[/b], these regions will be touched on only briefly." (Hiernaux, 1975) As someone mentioned at Hamiticunion: [QUOTE]Like the above, most of [b]Hiernaux's work is actually quite logical and well-conceived. It's just been taken out-of-context and/or heavily distorted by Afrocentrists[/b] writing in secondary sources. Hiernaux was a colleague of Carleton Coon's, and they often referenced each other's work. [/QUOTE] http://hamiticunion.proboards.com/thread/38 [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3