...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [QB] [IMG]https://snag.gy/oEQcDM.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v513/n7518/images_article/nature13673-f3.jpg[/IMG] Both these are not applicable to human evolution. Crazy that people in 2017 (even some intellectual posters here) are posting things like this... The idea Eurasians split from Africans has been falsified by genetics. For that to have happened, that must mean Eurasians are [i]exclusively[/i] derived from Africans, i.e. single unique ancestry. This latter hypothesis has been disproven since 2010 with Neanderthal autosomal DNA- [QUOTE][b]Modern Humans Are Not Simply or Uniquely the Descendants of Recent Africans[/b] It is now widely recognized that a phylogenetic origin of modernity—that is, the explanation that modern humans are the taxon that descended from the recent appearance of a modern human species of unique African origin—is demonstrably incorrect. No matter what species definition is used to describe the diversity of ancient humans—interbreeding human species or interbreeding populations of a single species—the issue of importance to us is whether or not there is a [i]single recent unique ancestry[/i] for modern populations. There is wide agreement that there was no bottleneck at the origin of modern humans (Sjödin et al., 2012), and [b]modern humans do not have a [i]single unique ancestry[/i] in a recent African (or any other) population[/b].[/QUOTE]- Caspari & Wolpoff, 2013 "The Process of Modern Human Origins" [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3