...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] @Lioness Exactly. Doug says I'm wrong for relating them to Africans. But he himself also thinks they're related to Africans. So how does one reconcile this glaring flip flop? You read between the lines and deduce what Doug is deliberately not telling you. What Doug is not telling you is that he simply doesn't like the affinity of Basal Eurasian and only accepts African ancestry in early farmers if that ancestry is Sub-Saharan African in affinity. If it's not, there has to be foul play at work and someone must have masked the "real" African ancestry. Little to no SSA-specific ancestry in Stuttgart is why people here suddenly stopped spamming Angel's descriptions of early farmers in Anatolia and Greece: [IMG]http://s10.postimg.org/w4jqr4ig9/24_5_2014_22_22_45.png[/IMG] When you confront him about his hidden agenda (which many here have), he denies it. That's when he does his lip service routine that "Africans can have all sorts of ancestry, and I never disputed that". This is also why Doug dislikes the term SSA ancestry. Again, he denies it, but he's simply salty about the fact that there was a lot of non-SSA ancestry in North Africa and that early farmer groups, and therefore, Egyptians, turn out to have a lot of this. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3