...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Akachi: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [qb] Its what I already said... The Afrocentrists like Doug cannot get their head around the idea "Basal Eurasian" ancestry might be (more) North African specific, not pan-African. They ignore population structure inside Africa. Funnily enough these Afrocentric loons do the exact same thing for Europe. All Europeans to them must be white in pigmentation; when I pointed southern Europeans are a faint light brown they got into a hissy-fit, just like they get mega butt-hurt when you point out northern Saharans like Egyptians (above the tropics) are not "black". [/qb][/QUOTE]No one should be entertaining this pasty pink Devil's trivial arguments. These "arguments" of his are an attempt to place Egyptsearch back in the same cycle of senseless arguments over the obvious facts, that these Devil's do not wish to be obvious (i.e. black Kemet; their humble cave man origins;that we civilized their nomadic asses after 2,000 B.C.E.). Prime example is the Devil is playing dumb (tricknology) about the well known fact that the original Europeans (Grimaldi) and the proceeding waves into the continent were black Africans, and he is using the modern term for the region "Nordic" and the implications of that word to obfuscate what we know happened. Caucasins attempt to historically root themselves to areas that they have overran throughout the World. The Caucasian did not enter Europe until after 2,000 B.C.E., and this fact needs not be let up on for the purpose of entertaining their bullshit. [i] [b]“The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are not closely related to the modern inhabitants[/b]... It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa.” (Brace et. al. (2006). The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form. Read more:[/i] [IMG]http://oi66.tinypic.com/4txets.jpg[/IMG] Think about how pathetic they have to be to KNOW that they were speechless nomadic savages for their entire existence prior to after 2,000 B.C.E., so for pride purposes that have to MANUFACTURE a false history which attaches themselves to the civilizations or areas that they usurp. He should be banned and these Devils need not have a voice in our consciousness from this point forward. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3