...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BlessedbyHorus: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: I see your point re: Yemenis. But if you look at the Fst data, that's not necessarily the case. A few weeks ago, I posted this (source is Lazaridis et al 2016): [IMG]https://snag.gy/60Sq9L.jpg[/IMG] Notice how close the Saudi sample is to the recently sampled Natufians. Out of living Eurasians, it has the best Fst distance, along with Bedouin A and the Jewish sample from Yemen. Levantine ancestry is not the common denominator here. Clearly, closeness to Natufians in Eurasia is mostly a function of North African ancestry + a limited amount SSA ancestry. That is why Druze and Bedouin B, though both Levantines, are removed from Natufians, [b]and why Canary Islanders (who are not Levantines) are surprisingly close to Natufians.[/b] [/QUOTE]Wow... The bolded is VERY surprising. At least to me. But anyways noted. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3