...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tyrannohotep: [qb] You know, I would have thought the whole insistence on a non-African AE (or at least a desire not to lump AE together with "black" people) wouldn't have even come about if there weren't individuals like de Volney and Bruce pointing out that AE were African in the first place. But then, I do get the sense that quite a number of people here on ES are black separatists who don't trust white people in general, even if some of them are more covert about it than Mike or Narmerthoth.. [/qb][/QUOTE]You can' muddy the water. You can't fabricate me saying all whites hold the same opinion after I've posted otherwise and also the mainstream anti-black academic norm. Champollion-Figeac was the script flipper. I excuse autism for incomprehension that C-F said the common knowledge view AE was black was wrong. You geno-hamiticist with your ad homina and white is right. You lay every controversy at the feet of black and white gets carte blanc free of any guilt or responsibility for this mess. If the nigras would just stay in their place we wouldn't have this problem to start with. I agree your liberal stance may be a cloak for your white supremacy. So what is it? AEs are only black in your chocolate girl fantasies? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3