...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Fourty2Tribes: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by sudaniya: The notion that the ancient Egyptians were Niger-Congo (Bantu) is insane and stupid and there has never been any evidence for it. All the evidence points to ancient Egyptians being indigenous Northeast Africans with a common origin with North Sudanese. I hope people don't start presenting these (Northern) Abusir mummies as representative of all of ancient Egypt. We still need a similar study on Southern Egypt. [/QB][/QUOTE]People have demonstrated that the Egyptians called themselves Bantu and half the royals tested so far had exclusive Bantu genes. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: When explorers, travelers and geographers from multiple cultural backgrounds continually link certain groups in Africa on phenotypical grounds, but not other groups, you can no longer say that people who refuse to call AE black in the modern western (racial) sense are necessarily racist. [/QB][/QUOTE]I can say it. They are racist. The typical image of ancient Egyptians are of people who would be considered black by most nations and states definitions today. Most of the people who have that double standard are indeed racist. In a world where this dude is considered black on TV... [IMG]https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/ricky-whittle-american-gods.jpg?w=446&h=299&crop=1[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3