...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] BTW though keita didn't like to use the term "black" as a pan African Identifier, he didn't **** on the Idea of a shared culture and even temporally distant common ancestor. He literally fought the Idea of a "true Negro." and as a geneticist it's perfectly fine to even communicate the fact that some Africans might be closer to Europeans for example than other Africans based on genetic distance... But are we gonna act like we don't understand the mechanisms behind why? are we also gonna dismiss the classical racist implications being made by those who see and hear this but don't fully understand? or worst, those who understand but use it to promote their harmful narrative..? gimme a break. I know that the Abusir mummies got some people shook... (and I'm not just talking about the Afroloons only as I said before in these threads), "How do I explain these affinities while upholding my old doctrine meanwhile not setting myself up for contradiction.... Abort mission, reinforce hamaticism lowkey..." Yeah, A.Egyptians where homogenous rs1426654-A since its inception all of a sudden, I guess the paint darkened over time. [IMG]https://s29.postimg.org/5a8tpiik7/mhm_mhm_mhm.gif[/IMG] [i]Black-African[/i] = political term? ... heh, incredible observations. IIght I'm out. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3