...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] ^but they aren't African nor were they closely descended from or related to Africans... 'Boom bam bing' case closed and wrap that sh!t up, Fvck bout the Chinese they're irrelevant. To press the issue towards the OP... Folks don't forget that Geneflow OOA was presumably sex biased so a non- African or non-indigenous populations can have a decent amount of E-PN2 Y haplogroups... Keep that in mind. The Abusir sample sets up a landscape for understanding what has happened on many levels. Beyoku Asked a question earlier, I answered. I think I'm the only one that answered... the only one besides cass/ that made a prediction before the leaked images dropped, the only one who payed much mind to the distribution of lineages based on the time period they were earthed... This thread is getting a lil frustrating not gonna lie. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3