...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Fourty2Tribes: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: The point is, you clearly subscribed to a definition of 'black' that is divorced from skin pigmentation and centered on a certain type of ancestry. So much so that you called the 'pigmentation only' crowd "disingenuous". [/QUOTE]Indeed I do. My definition of black is whatever helps deal with white supremacy, genes and skin color be damn. I call people disingenuous when they have double standards for state and nation's definitions of black ie Charles Barkley and ancient Egypt. Or if they have double standards for their personal life. For example, a lot of these alt-righters would and have argued that Egyptians were caucasians or not black but let people who depict themselves as [IMG]http://joemonster.org/images/vad/img_36705/697c1e220273da2203df8e09ea029a78.jpg[/IMG] move into their neighborhood. [QUOTE] 1) So how can you establish that someone is racist for disqualifying people from this category based on your own criteria? 2) How 'black' are the recently sampled Natufians and Abusir samples in this sense (in percentages)? [/qb][/QUOTE]Its not based on my criteria. Its based on state and nation. If someone says that race is a social construct then I ask them who should play ancient Egyptians in a movie. Who looks like them? 2) Do we have more than just haplogroups on the Natufian and Abusir samples? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3