...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Fourty2Tribes: I assume that anyone saying you need one drop rules to call ancient Egyptians black are on a cognitive dissonance stunt.[/QUOTE]Well, under the one drop rule the AE may be more African than they are under your criteria. Under the one drop role they're at least unquestionably 'black' (using that weird logic). Under your standards, they're only as black as they fit your own description of the term. According to you Charles Barkley is 75% 'black' and 'black' is that 75% in him. If you apply this thinking to a lot of African(-derived) populations (e.g. Natufians, Abusir, who no doubt have ancient Egyptian ancestry) you will severely underestimate their African ancestry. Upper Palaeolithic OOA populations only ~0-10% 'black'? C'mon bro. Own up to the consequences of the terminology you use. People who deny AE are 'black' using your standards are still using your standards. Just because they come to an undesired and inconvenient conclusion it doesn't mean they're not using the same standards. [IMG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YECMQQMgnlk/VFw0eBTGjRI/AAAAAAAAJ14/itneofdPteI/s1600/F1.large.jpg[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3