...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] From what I can recollect from High School biology , it still takes a man to impregnate a woman and his yDNA will be passed down to his son. That said, there is no male lineage found in modern Egypt that is not of African(East) origin. Since I contend that R1b-M269 may be of West (North )African origin. J1 is omnipresent in Africa and may have existed in Africa since the early Holocene. J2 may be the only external or non-African lineage found in Egypt and the rest of Africa. It is primarily found in Coastal cities of North Africa. Since it's geographic pattern is "spotty" the most plausible scenario is Ottoman Turks. Or Ashkenazi expulsion. It other words the genetic pattern does NOT fit the "documented" history of Persian or European Greek invasion regardless of what "you read". Maybe someone can point out my error....if they can. @ELMaestro. ALL!, ALL! , ALL! genetic evidence publish to date supports what I have been saying all along. Europeans are a subset of Africans and there was never "back-migration". The genetic pattern is consistent with IBD. ALL of it. What some of you fools don't understand is for the "high frequency of autosomes" to work in lieu of IBD, there needed to be pure isolation followed by unique mutation in that landmass then re- expansion. And this will supported by yDNA or mtDNA. They, autosomes AND lineage needs to work together. AND IT DOES NOT!!!!!! That is why I am 100% correct and no one can disprove what I am saying. No One! And these researchers know this. That is why they always use one or the other never BOTH lineage and admixture charts. That is why they stopped used TreeMix or are selective about using it. That is why they left North Africa out of the Bell Beaker Study when North has huge amounts of megaliths and BBC also. Also when there is archeological evidence that the culture preceded that in Europe. You fools, it is a game. Don't you understand that. These scientist know that it is a game and we are the pawns with our silly arguments. The AEians are indigenous Africans, there is no" if they were" or any nonsense like that. The really question is how Africanized were the Greeks...and what happened to ancient Greeks. Arnaiz-Villens was correct. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Punos_Rey: [qb] "There is [b]no genetic proof of foreigners in Egypt unless these foreigners were also Africanized people.[/b]" How could someone say this with a straight face??? [/qb][/QUOTE]Beats the snot outta me? [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3