...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Because I need to get something off my chest
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Punos_Rey: [qb] Right I just made them up, and I thought you said dark brown equals black, not just near black (darker end of type 6) a category you said was "too narrow to be useful" [IMG]http://www.simplysunscreen.com/images/skin-type-faces.jpg[/IMG] Type 5 skin falls well within what you called the "chocolate class" on the luschan tile scale too. [QUOTE] Originally posted by Cass/: - This has already been done, i.e. if you look at anthro literature such as Coon, "black" is used from [b]29-36, which Coon (1939) describes as the "chocolate-brown class".[/b] I already provided quotes that show this. Since these are fuzzy catagories, sometimes you get 28 or even 27 also called "black", but it virtually never covers the light brown skin shades that Afrocentrists try to categorize as black to fit their politics[/QUOTE]Type V ([b]scores 28–34[/b]) very rarely burns, tans very easily (brown) Type VI ([b]scores 35–36[/b]) never burns, always tans (deeply pigmented dark brown to darkest brown, black in complexion) Try again, dumb b!tch [/qb][/QUOTE]Erm No. There's no accurate way to match Luschan to the Fitzpatrick scale; completely different ranges exist per author/study. Type VI isn't limited to 35-36; that can clearly be seen by just looking at the chocolate brown (as opposed to near jet black) colour of the smiley face (VI). Duh. A dermatology publication I'm looking at on PDF right now has different ranges. You only had to Google this to find. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3