...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Because I need to get something off my chest
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.: [qb] The only one treating SSA as a single biological unit are Swenet and these geneticists. I remember when my mtDNA, L4b2, was not counted as sub-Saharan because at that time only L1 and L2 were counted as sub-Saharan because of the Hpal 3592np mutation being present in L1 and L2 [/qb][/QUOTE]So, why happened? Why did they changed it and how was it changed. I mean it created a direct conflict of interest. Btw [QUOTE] African and Middle Eastern populations shared the greatest number of alleles absent from all other populations (fig. S6B). Within Africa, the most private alleles were in southern Africa, reflecting those in southern African Khoesan (SAK) San and !Xun/Khwe populations (fig. S6C) (12). Eastern and Saharan Africans shared the most alleles absent from other African populations examined (fig. S6D). [/QUOTE]—Sarah A. Tishkoff, The Genetic Structure and History of Africans and African Americans [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3