...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Because I need to get something off my chest
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [QB] @ Oshun can you stop trying to mask your dishonest pan-African intentions and politics? Back in February, 2017 I posted this to you: [QUOTE]Afrocentrists* have also modified their position to realise the Egyptians were Saharan [North] Africans, not Sub-Saharan Africans. My only issue with the latter is that they still call Saharan Africans "black"; the average skin colour of northern Saharan peoples, including modern Egyptians, is too light to be labelled black and living Egyptians do not consider themselves to be black either.[/QUOTE]*Those Afrocentrists I had in mind were the more intellectual ones on this forum, who modified their views as now has Nodarb (this thread creator). They no longer argue ancient Egyptians were SSA's or had strong biological ties to SSA's, but were Saharan [North] Africans. Your response to the above was rejecting this intellectual-honest shift and to criticize those posters arguing for the Saharan theory. Secondly like Bass did to Swenet, you bogusly accused me of "true negro stereotyping" for merely pointing out Saharan's do not cluster biologically with populations below the Sahara. One of your pan-African arguments is since the Sahara desert today once had a different climate (for short interval periods), somehow that means there is no biological distinction between SSA's and North Africans. It's completely erroneous because the genetic distance of these populations to SSA's in response to climatic desertification or humidification would not have changed. You constantly confuse adaptation with genetic distance. Even if the Saharan desert was once more lush and humid, its inhabitants were still thousands of km away from SSA's. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Oshun: For thousands of years there had been NO Sahara. The Sahara had just started coming back, which forced many populations that made kemet to move towards the Nile in the first place. Its so amazingly stupid that African Americans are called sub saharans despite being centuries removed from Sub Saharan Africa.[/QUOTE]In conclusion, you're in the same boat as Charlie Bass, Zaharan etc. Pan-Africanist. You're purely in this for the politics, no science. If not, you would be doing what Nodard has done and changed his views. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3