...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
There you have it…white Africans.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] Well said. Yes, they can’t identify that elusive “Eurasian backmigrants”. In that latest paper on R-V88. They conclude it is back migrants from “possibly” the Near East but provided no data from the Near East. Yet, provided data that LBK farmers carried similar haplotypes to the Toubou, So there is again that direct North-South connection between Europe and SS Africa. Even more interesting the paper added that modern Sardinians carry the closest match to SSA Toubou. White people are confused and unsure of their place in the world. The grew up believing they are the most important but are now finding out it was all a lie. And they just won’t give it up. Agreed. “They need to get over themselves”. And to add salt to the wound they added this “We next tested the Toubou, who have ~30% Eurasian ancestry. [b]The Toubou appeared to split from Eurasians ~30,000–40,000 ya,[/b] a time more recent than expected considering the African-Eurasian split 60,000–80,000 ya20” . “ Now, does that make any sense? What is wrong with these fools? How Can it be called Eurasian or be from Europe when the slit occurred BEFORE Europe was essentially occupied by AMH…..from the Middle East I might add. Lol! [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mansamusa: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by capra: [qb] ---- lot more from China in the near future since Qiaomei Fu has set up her own lab there now. [/q][/QUOTE]Well, I personally don't understand the dearth of samples from America or China, to be honest. But understand what I mean when I say that Europeans should get over themselves. Europeans are human and its only natural that they have a bias in favor of their own histories or cultures. But this shit is getting ridiculous. If these scientists have any respect and understanding of human history, they should know that Africa is the most important place to be studying for answers. For chrissake, recent dioscoveries have shown that we don't even know for sure how old the human species actually is. And even more importantly, we don't know where to draw the line between Eurasian and African in terms of ancient dna. Eurasian affinity in Africa is due to either one of two possibilities: 1. Post-OOA African migration from Africa to the Middle East during prehistory(which is what I personally believe). In the case of the Natufians, traditional archaeolgy paints them as bi-products of Africans who migrated from NA and intermarried with Levantine locals. 2. Multiple prehistoric Eurasian migrations from that ill-defined mass of land called Eurasia, via a process which is yet to be archaeologically delineated into the very heart of Africa. This seems to be the mainstream opinion in the world of genetics, at least. Option number two is not without merit, considering that the majority of the oldest ancient samples are located in Eurasia. It makes sense that a genetic element found in both prehistoric African and Eurasian genetic samples would be called Eurasian if the oldest Eurasian samples are a few millenia older than the oldest ancient African sample discovered so far. The only way this can be settled once and forever is with ancient African samples as old as or older than these Eurasian samples. But instead, we are tortured with tons of ancient dna from the most insignificant, boring, and unimportant corners of Europe. They are not even giving us stuff from the interesting parts of Europe like Rome and Greece. Just boring fuckery about the Steppes! [/Q][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3