...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Human Mobility and Identity:..GARAMANTES (2019)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: Exactly, they have always tried to impose these 'racial' characteristics on ancient African remains from Mechtoid to Mediterranean, even on sites far to the South in Gobero, which has been discussed here numerous times before. And the funny part with this study is they don't even compare these skulls with those other Saharan sites. [/QUOTE]you've made this comment in reply to a Djehuti quote but in that Djehuti quote he said nothing about imposing racial traits He was doing the opposite, pointing out "negroid" racial traits in proto-historical Punic remains rather than saying 'racial' characteristics should not be imposed He says "The results of heterogeneity aren't that surprising " He did not say "look how they are calling these remains 'negroid', at it again imposing racial characteristics, wrong" Djehuti might agree with your remark but your remark does not make sense in reply he said in that quote. What he's doing here is saying, look, there were more negroids over here Even though he is battling Antalas does not mean every time he quotes him he is disputing his info. Also issues raised of the Garmantes site in Libya are not instantly resolved by looking at Gobero in Niger. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3