posted
The user Truthcentric (real name: Brandon Pilcher or Jabrosky) claims he is not biased or influenced by any ''isms''. In a recent post he has claimed he wishes to major in Biological Anthropology to counter all such ''isms'' or ''hypotheses influence'':
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric: Actually I agree that a lot of biological anthropologists even today do seem to suffer from the old hypotheses' influence. We could accomplish a lot more by addressing them rather than fruitlessly arguing with boneheads on the Internet. This is one major reason I've chosen to major in Biological Anthropology; change must come from within the system.
The Afrocentrics on this forum usually use this guy as a chess pawn, as he is of European Caucasoid ('white') racial origin yet supposedly agrees with the Afronut idea the ancient egyptians were ''Black'':
quote:LOL. Truthcentric is WHITE just not an idiot suffering from low-self esteemed superiority complex based on false notions of race.
Just because Truthcentric wants to accept the TRUTH of Egypt's African identity since it IS in Africa, does not make him an 'Afrocentric'.
However anyone who researches this guy clearly sees an underlying racial biasness and agenda.
These are from his deviant art page:
quote: light-skinned girls truthfully don't really do it for me the way darker ones do now, because they have less of the exotic look that I like in black women in the first place.
''Jabrosky's 10 Hottest Women'' -
In his spare time he also creates interracial art between white men and black woman:
This clearly isn't a normal guy who has looked at the data objectively. He's motivated and biased for personal reasons - his fetish for black females, and secondly a socio-political bias. He has on this forum posted his 'dream' of America being all one phenotype, through mass miscegenation.
Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
I take it Dr. Ashton has a thing for black men! LOL By the way, her interest in black Egypt was sparked by Greco-Roman texts (she's a Classicist) described the Egyptians as black and identified them with Ethiopians! But I forgot, Ethiopians are "Caucasians"! LMAO
GTFOHPosts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Brandon's has sometimes questioned the African nature of Ancient Egypt, right here on Egyptsearch. On numerous occasians he has questioned far fetched hyper diffusionist claims some Afrocentrics adhere to.
Brandon's taste in women has nothing to do with him acknowledging the truth, and his neutrality on the subject is not up for questioning.
Its like saying Henry Louis Gates' taste in white women has anything to do with him saying the Ancient Egyptians weren't black.
Angho' low IQ and deficit in reasoning ability is showing again.
Posts: 8785 | From: Discovery Channel's Mythbusters | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
1) So-called "leading authority" Froment has in no way "debunked" the data of Hiernaux. To the contrary- Hiernaux's balanced model of African diversity, including elongated Africans, has been confirmed multiple times, using both skeletal evidence and DNA, and is so cited by Keita 1991, 1999, 2005 etc. The only "debunking" is of the bogus fantasies of the equally bogus "hamitic" "union".
2. Maca-Meyer's claims are unimpressive as part of any racial "Kakazoid" model of expansion. We all know that there has been ancient gene flow via the crossroads that is the Middle East, but at what point did such gene flow become "Kakazoid", save as yet another self-serving Eurocentric labeling exercise?
In fact, Maca-Meyer undermines assorted "Kakazoid" race models by noting that gene differentiation was ALREADY occurring WITHIN Africa t`ens of thousands of years ago. IN other words, the gene variants that would become distinctive in Asia and the "Middle East" were ALREADY taking place WITHIN Africa BEFORE any SIGNIFICANT EXPANSION OUTWARD. These would grow more distinct due to time and distance from Africa but the founding variants and/or proto-variants were ALREADY in place WITHIN Africa. Hence, African fishermen migrating into the Sinai PEnisula or Arabia circa 60kya did not suddenly become "Middle Eastern" or "Eurasian" nor does a white guy who crosses the Rio Grande into Mexico suddenly become "Hispanic." THis is the cynical labeling game being foisted on the gullible by the European academy to de-africanize tropical African peoples, or minimize their built in indigenous diversity.
3. Claims of "racial backflow" (however disguised with labels like "EUrasian" or "Middle Eastern") fall short, because those "backflowing" ALREADY RESEMBLED TROPICAL AFRICANS as proved by credible studies. It is hilarious to watch the self-serving hypocrisy of Eurocentrics. When dark-skinned, broad-nosed people with tropical limb proportions are found far west of the Sahara they are firmly "true negroes." WHen similar people are found in Arabia, the SInai or Iraq they comnveniently become "Eurasian." THe bogus "hamitic union" is a prime example of this hypocrisy in operation. ------------------------------------------------------------------
In the attack on Afrocentrism so condescendingly voiced by the non-anthropologist Stephen Howe about African American historians he expressed his view that of a "moribund state" of the older "Eurocenttric" "Mediterranean race" theory. Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes p. 116
^^Stephen Howe himself dabbles in hypocrisy and strawmen. He spends a great deal of time railing against "Afrocentrics" but carefully buried in his condescending screed is an admission of the central point raised by so-called "Afrocentrics"..
Likewise Froment is quoted as bashing the "Afrocentrics" but he too quietly admits the "sub-Saharan" character of the Nile Valley in various eras as well as similarities between Egyptians and East Africans.
Gene flow into the Nubian area during the Neolithic was not from reputed "wandering Caucasoids" but from tropical, Sub-Saharan types.
"Prior to the Neolithic, populations of the Nile Valley in Nubia are very robust, and, because of a gap in the fossil record,` it is difficult to connect them to later populations. Some have postulated a local evolution, due to diet change, while others postulated migrations, especially from the Sahara area. But between 5000 and 1000 BC, many cemeteries have supplied a large amount of skeletons, and the anatomical characters of Nubian populations are easier to follow-up. Twenty-seven archaeological samples (4 at 5000 BC, 5 at 4000 BC, 10 at 3000 BC, 3 at 2000 BC, 5 at 1000 BC), and 10 craniofacial measurements, have been considered. While cerebral skull is fairly stable, facial skull displays several regular modifications, and specially a reduction of facial and nasal heights, a broadening of the nose, and an increase of prognathism, while bizygomatic breadth is unchanged. These features illustrate a trend towards a growing resemblance with populations of Sub-Saharan Africa living in wet environments. However, paleoclimatological studies show that Nubia experienced an increasing aridification during that period. It is then unlikely that such a morphological change could be related to any local adaptive evolution to environment. Random drift is also unlikely, because the anatomical trend is relatively uniform during these millennia. It then seems more plausible that these changes correspond to the increasing presence of Southern populations migrating northward." -- Froment, A. (2002) Morphological micro-evolution of Nubian Populations from, A-Group to Christian Epochs: gene flow, not local adaptation. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 34:72.
Afrocentric critic Froment also notes: "Black populations of the Horn of Africa (Tigré and Somalia) fit well into Egyptian variations." (Froment, Alain, Origines du peuplement de l’Égypte ancienne: l’apport de l’anthropobiologie, Archéo-Nil 2 (Octobre 1992), 79-98)
This is a common pattern with the Eurocentrics. They build great bogus strawmen to slay - such as the dreaded bogeymen- the "Afrocentrics" while behind the scenes, at the backdoor, grudgingly conceding several central points raised by said "Afrocentrics." It's like Mary Lefkowitz who admits the African character of ancient Egypt, even as "Afrocentric critics" continue to use her work to "refute" Afrocentrism. These people actually believe no one has yet caught on to the game.
It turns out the Euronuts are not as Neanderdumb as one might have been misled to think. They can actually be excused for their constant harping on themes thought to be mostly long obsolete in the West.
^^Not so much excused as exposed. They can say what they like but once the the 3 points above are considered, their whole hypocritical edifice crumbles like a rotten house of cards.
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] Brandon's has sometimes questioned the African nature of Ancient Egypt, right here on Egyptsearch. On numerous occasians he has questioned far fetched hyper diffusionist claims some Afrocentrics adhere to.
Brandon's taste in women has nothing to do with him acknowledging the truth, and his neutrality on the subject is not up for questioning.
Its like saying Henry Louis Gates' taste in white women has anything to do with him saying the Ancient Egyptians weren't black.
do you have quotes where he says that?
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: The user Truthcentric (real name: Brandon Pilcher or Jabrosky) claims he is not biased or influenced by any ''isms''. In a recent post he has claimed he wishes to major in Biological Anthropology to counter all such ''isms'' or ''hypotheses influence'':
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric: Actually I agree that a lot of biological anthropologists even today do seem to suffer from the old hypotheses' influence. We could accomplish a lot more by addressing them rather than fruitlessly arguing with boneheads on the Internet. This is one major reason I've chosen to major in Biological Anthropology; change must come from within the system.
The Afrocentrics on this forum usually use this guy as a chess pawn, as he is of European Caucasoid ('white') racial origin yet supposedly agrees with the Afronut idea the ancient egyptians were ''Black'':
quote:LOL. Truthcentric is WHITE just not an idiot suffering from low-self esteemed superiority complex based on false notions of race.
Just because Truthcentric wants to accept the TRUTH of Egypt's African identity since it IS in Africa, does not make him an 'Afrocentric'.
However anyone who researches this guy clearly sees an underlying racial biasness and agenda.
These are from his deviant art page:
quote: light-skinned girls truthfully don't really do it for me the way darker ones do now, because they have less of the exotic look that I like in black women in the first place.
''Jabrosky's 10 Hottest Women'' -
In his spare time he also creates interracial art between white men and black woman:
This clearly isn't a normal guy who has looked at the data objectively. He's motivated and biased for personal reasons - his fetish for black females, and secondly a socio-political bias. He has on this forum posted his 'dream' of America being all one phenotype, through mass miscegenation.
quote:These people serve no purpose in life, they are just internet trolls who get a kick out of trying to smear people.
posted
Actually, as a Black Woman, I do find the following cartoon offensive:
and I'm hoping that I don't need to explain the offense to the Black People of this forum...it should be obvious to those with knowledge of Our history....
This too, as a Black Woman (and a dark-skin one at that), I find to be offensive:
quote: light-skinned girls truthfully don't really do it for me the way darker ones do now, because they have less of the exotic look that I like in black women in the first place.
kmt...the adjective "exotic' by its definition is offensive in this context when used by yte men...I shouldn't have to explain why, but I'll help out those who may not get it:
ex·ot·ic [ig-zot-ik] adjective 1. of foreign origin or character; not native; introduced from abroad, but not fully naturalized or acclimatized: exotic foods; exotic plants. 2. strikingly unusual or strange in effect or appearance: an exotic hairstyle. 3. of a uniquely new or experimental nature: exotic weapons. 4. of, pertaining to, or involving stripteasing: the exotic clubs where strippers are featured. noun 5. something that is exotic: The flower show included several tropical exotics with showy blooms. 6. an exotic dancer; stripper.
It is NOT a compliment when yte men call Black Women 'exotic looking' and I am far from the only Black Woman who feels so.... Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by factles-eediatbwoy: Exotic = Fucking exaggerated, abnormal, unusual and freakish physical features.
Now you know what is meant when people say "real black, Black women are exotic looking."
I was not unaware of the mainstream dictionary's definition of 'exotic' as I posted above....hence the offense when hearing yte men refer to Black Women that they find attractive as 'exotic' looking...
now...
please....
btw... Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by facts: Exotic = Fucking exaggerated, abnormal, unusual and freakish physical features.
Now you know what is meant when people say "real black, Black women are exotic looking."
It also should be pointed out that even though Truthcentric claims he is attracted to black women, he's made it quite clear these are only black women who artifically straighten their hair (7/10 from his ''hot list' have fake hair). So even among abnormal insecure white men who have a fetish for black females, they still are not attracted to the TRUE black/Negroid phenotype. Posts: 1575 | From: - | Registered: May 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
^Anglo troll, you're just p1ssed off because truthcentric is studying at a more prestigious university than you, and will enter the mainstream to lend even further evidence to the fact that Egypt was black. You on the other hand will always have to hide and evade, look over your shoulder and cover your tracks, and live with the knowledge that your sh1tty racist views will always remain marginalised.
You can go ahead and try to launch a political career if you want, but let me assure you of something - the moment I recognise you in the media I will disseminate the comments that you've made on this board. I sh1t you not. We will then see whether or not the mainstream regards your views as racist.
Posts: 838 | From: London | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Embarrassed]](redface.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
I was not unaware of the mainstream dictionary's definition of 'exotic' as I posted above....hence the offense when hearing yte men refer to Black Women that they find attractive as 'exotic' looking...
Printer-friendly view of this topic