posted
^^ Mike didn't outline a proposal with supporting arguments. He merely said that African Americans are 50% European.
Without such a claim argued why waste time elaborating on it?
For example somebody comes out and says Swedes are 50% Chinese. Now I've got to go writing a big thing about why the Swedes are not Chinese ???
Look the only difference between Mike and Egmond is one wants to be a European king and the other a European queen. but I'm not sure which
But wait a minute, I've already done numerous threads about Charles V and other aristocratic assholes from back in the day. So actually I have been already talking about this for quite a while.
meanwhile you seem a little sheepish on the topic, like Mikes's your little bo peep
Posts: 42976 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^That's not really true lioness, the subject was discussed many times. If you would like to refresh your memory, the material is here.
Ok Mike, I see you have referenced your History of the Black Holy Roman Empire page. I suppose these are that 50% of African Americans
Of course I've already made many comments on this about subject, claims that the Holy Romans were black and that a large number of African Americans descend from these Germanic Otto, Rudolph and Frederick types, who were black. Basically you argue that the Franks were black and that Catholiscism is more black than Protestantism
Anyway one can only wonder what Narmertot thinks of all this athough his silence on the matter is telling
Posts: 42976 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Damn Egmond, what the fuch is wrong with you? [/b]
The whole thing is quite confusing, and these people had different definitions then we have today. Why is he saying that the newcomers are not whites. Why should the oldcomers be white. Where did they come from, if not the same countries as the newcomers.
Syrians, and Cape Verdians are whites by definition, but many do not look white to us.
So perhaps many Europeans regarded themselves as whites by definition.
Not all went for this Black superiority thing, as everybody was subjected to the rule ofthe nobility. That's why it was these brown and black Europeans who brought the Ancient regime down.
because people have the same complexion does not mean they need to have solidarity. nations cannot be divided solely on the base of complexion. The present Dutch keep Poles and Rumanians as slaves. They loath Turks, who are whites, because of their religion.
Many Americans believe they are pure white or pure Black: a fallacy.
Posts: 5454 | From: Holland | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic