posted
My point? Give thanks to Martin Lucas, a white man, for helping the Africanist cause.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Why? I'm not going to deny Lucas Martin contribution but it seems ridiculous act like this is good when knowledge is meant for all and it's suppose to be presented without bias.
Posts: 1123 | From: New York | Registered: Feb 2016
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Please hear no tone, it's just the way I talk.
Lucas Martin's DNAtribes was for anybody interested and gave out DNA info to any and all who paid for a DNA analysis just the same as 23&Me or any of 'em.
I don't understand this "for anybody" concept always hurled at blacks as if Western white ethos don't permeate all websites by Western Whites.
Coming up, I read book after mainstream book where the word us is used and it only ever meant Western White people. In fact one anthropologist, MDW Jeffries (1951) point blank stated "us not negro" in his West African Review article "The Negro Enigma".
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
Remember Hamiticism is inseparably linked to NE and E Africa as AMH Caucas(ian/oid) and Jeffreys was clear that modern man
quote:is our stock, not Negro ... us, not Negro ... our group, not that of the Negro ... Thus in Africa, from the Old Stone Age to modern times, Modern Man is the tool maker. Nowhere is the Negro, ..., associated with these stone age cultures.
.
I thank Martin beyond the grave for inspiring my methodology of comparing aDNA autosomal STRs to current ethnic group databases. It allowed me to narrow down with precision the affinities of the royal Armanas royals none of whom were even anything like a Levatine plurality.
Between Armarna STRs and Abusir whole genome we see the Amarnas were Africans ruling AE unlike the Abusir 3 who are used to promote Levantine AE without any African component except as post dynastic slaves.
My methodology beats the pants off any "Black" scientist out there who could do no better than an online percentage calculator limited 3-5 very broad choices. Africa's a big arse continent so nn% African is ethnically meaningless.
posted
When, where, who? data Are we comparing apples and oranges. There are no CODIS STR released. Confirmed by me and later HAAk per email.
Apples and orange?
"Between Armarna STRs and Abusir whole genome we see the Amarnas were Africans ruling AE unlike the Abusir 3 who are used to promote Levantine AE without any African component except as post dynastic slaves."
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Nice work. Been awhile since I got deep into this DNA. But the Abusir? Using the slave theory is no different than Europeans explain away ...presence of African DNA in high culture...as slaves.
Where is the DNA, STR, apples and apples, showing that the Abusir were NOT SSA?
To the newbies - imagine you looking at the entire genome stretched out over miles. Take a magnifying glass look at locations where the CODIS STRs should be present. Guess what? Those locations are NOT there. “Nucleotide bases” at that location are GONE!!! All >21 locations STR are gone. Suspicious?! ! That is an understatement. Confronted, Haak, made up a BS story which is highly improbable. So, if they were really Levantine …..Slaves…., there would be no need hide or remove the data. You know that.
But he could not foresee new DNA tools coming out to unravel his lie.
There's a reason CODIS STRs are now avoided like the plague, along with TreeMix, in biogeographic population articles.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic