This study was published online this month according to Wiley InterScience.
The author is Dr. Sonia R. Zakrzewski. As many people here may recall Dr. Zakrzewski was the British bioanthropologist who confirmed that the Ancient Egyptians had tropical body plans.
Based on the abstract she appears to be saying that there was indeed continuity in Ancient Egypt from the predynastic through Dynastic period but that this changed from the end of that era to the present time.
I am very insterested in seeing this study. Do you have it by any chance Myra?
Posts: 1203 | From: USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ She is also one of the anthropologist who called to task Howells Ptolemiac Era E series remains as being 'non representative' or unlike ancient Egyptians.
This is and important citation to reference because the most widely reported attempts to associate km.t with Europeans are based on Howells E series....including some outdated work by Brace and others.
Posts: 15202 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Population Continuity or Population Change: Formation of the Ancient Egyptian State Sonia R. Zakrzewski American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 132: 501–509 (2007)
quote:Originally posted by Myra Wysinger: Population Continuity or Population Change: Formation of the Ancient Egyptian State Sonia R. Zakrzewski American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 132: 501–509 (2007)
quote:Originally posted by Mansa Musa: Based on the abstract she appears to be saying that there was indeed continuity in Ancient Egypt from the predynastic through Dynastic period but that this changed from the end of that era to the present time.
She doesn't seem to mention any analysis of post-dynastic skulls in this study. It appears to focus on the relationship between predynastic and early dynastic crania. The conclusion, that predynastic and early dynastic skulls were closely related, does refute any notions that some grand K-zoid race brought civilization to Egypt.
Posts: 7082 | From: Fallbrook, CA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mansa Musa: Based on the abstract she appears to be saying that there was indeed continuity in Ancient Egypt from the predynastic through Dynastic period but that this changed from the end of that era to the present time.
She doesn't seem to mention any analysis of post-dynastic skulls in this study. It appears to focus on the relationship between predynastic and early dynastic crania. The conclusion, that predynastic and early dynastic skulls were closely related, does refute any notions that some grand K-zoid race brought civilization to Egypt.
Yeah I gathered that after reading it all. The study also only seems to be about craniometric variation and does not take into account other examples of biological evidence.
I'd really like to see a study that does that and analyzes Egypt in all major periods.
I'll be reading over this one a bit more. Does anyone else who has read the study have any insights?
Posts: 1203 | From: USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |