posted
You know the chart is not from NG but DNATribes?
I posted this many times. west Asians are the Turks. Look at the population dataset. Also Sahara_Arabians are the indigenous North Africans/Amazigh and Arab Bedouins we know are the remnants of the African Natufians.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I know it's DnaTribes. I don't think you emphasized how it demonstrated how gentrified modern Egypt is. Modern Egypt is more Arabian than North African. That contradicts Nat-Geo.
That's the topic. Tribes says modern Egyptians are 42% Arabian. Nat-Geo has them at 17%. Major difference. I think Tribes is more accurate because they show all their work.
Posts: 1254 | From: howdy | Registered: Mar 2014
| IP: Logged |
posted
Another interesting point is ...."west Asian' are not "Arabs" per DNATribes. So the label "Arabs' can become convoluted. So Mike was on the right track.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |