posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by rahotep101: I grant the queen Tiye statue has something approaching the look, but this is not sustained by her actual mummy, which also has long flowy hair, by the way...  

---

No matter how you twist it, turn it, flip it, alter it...etc...  

               

Akward this image shows differently,

                        

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-:
This whole argument is to say the least retarded. Half the slaves mentioned were White and every single slave owner were either Wealthy or Nobility. How this advances your case is beyond me.

---

She wants to argue that the AEs were "racially mixed", had "middle skin tone between Negroid and Caucasian". She will then use mural paintings to prove they were different from not only "negro Kushites", but Euros and Asians as well. Priceless.

http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=006790;p=1

quote:

---

Originally posted by the lioness:


Ramesses II, Brooklyn Museum.

---

Posts: 4254 | From: dasein | Registered: Jun 2009  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

From now on let the descendants of these people: believe that the ancient Egyptian were the same as themselves... Whereas these dubious characters:

---

Kinda like this guy after all you did say their descendants.

Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by rahotep101:

Why don't we see these 'true negro' features among ancient Egyptians on a regular basis if they come from the same population?

---

No, ''we'' DO see those extreme features ..
You're just blind as a bat.

Posts: 8785 | From: Discovery Channel's Mythbusters | Registered: Dec 2009  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by rahotep101:
From now on let the descendants of these people:


believe that the ancient Egyptian were the same as themselves...

Whereas these dubious characters:



Must be intruders and impostors, and can't possibly descend from these:





Stands to reason, eh? Even though there's nothing to say the present day Coptic Egyptians have different genetic makeup to the ancient Egyptians on the whole. Even though ancient Egyptians with thick lips protruding as far as their noses are as common as blond Zulus.
Even though, in other words, it's next to impossible to find an ancient Egyptian who looks like this:


Why don't we see these 'true negro' features among ancient Egyptians on a regular basis if they come from the same population?

I can see why you want to ban the words 'negro' and 'negroid' and thereby obscure things and stifle the debate. It seems quite obvious that not all dark-skinned 'black' Africans are negroids, and if closely related peoples can look so different that will take some explaining. Facial features are, after all, the result of genetics, are they not?.

---

You are a dumb piece of ****. Since there is not such thing a the true "negro". You keep ranting on with your nazi matra.

The word negro derived from the Spanish word negra, meaning black.


Africans are not all like the woman you keep showing.

This is why you cannot respond to the posts of other pheonotypical features amongst Africans being posted here.


And before genetics, there is a result of mutation of these genes. Like local adaption of the environment and diet. As the main factors, in short biodiversity. But retarded nazis like you don't know or even understand this. So the reason why you will fine more diversity is because the continent is LARGER than europe, even in tiny Europe you will find diversity. Amongst Asians you will find lot of diversity as well, even with in the Chinese population, Indian population or Japanese you will find phenotypes based on tribe.

Furthermore, reason why the North of Egypt had a component of indigenous light skin is because of the environment, of Mediterranean. The woman you show I believe is from Congo?

Africans cluster genetically, yet look diverse. This is why people outside of Africa mutated and morphed genetically. Linked to haplo L3, L4.


Ethiopians and Khoisan share the deepest clades of the human Y-chromosome phylogeny. Semino O, Santachiara-Benerecetti AS, Falaschi F, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Underhill PA.

Dipartimento di Genetica e Microbiologia, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Abstract

The genetic structure of 126 Ethiopian and 139 Senegalese Y chromosomes was investigated by a hierarchical analysis of 30 diagnostic biallelic markers selected from the worldwide Y-chromosome genealogy. The present study reveals that (1) only the Ethiopians share with the Khoisan the deepest human Y-chromosome clades (the African-specific Groups I and II) but with a repertoire of very different haplotypes; (2) most of the Ethiopians and virtually all the Senegalese belong to Group III, whose precursor is believed to be involved in the first migration out of Africa; and (3) the Ethiopian Y chromosomes that fall into Groups VI, VIII, and IX may be explained by back migrations from Asia. The first observation confirms the ancestral affinity between the Ethiopians and the Khoisan, which has previously been suggested by both archaeological and genetic findings.


Phylogenetic tree of the Y-chromosome haplotypes and their percent frequencies in the two Ethiopian groups (Oromo and Amhara) and in the Senegalese of the present study, compared with the frequencies in the Ethiopians and Khoisan previously reported by Underhill et al.(2000). Numbering of mutations is according to Underhill et al.(2001): those examined in the present study are shown in boldface type; those inferred or reported by Underhill et al.(2000) are shown in italics. Haplotype numbers in the present study are shown in boldface type; those in italics are from Underhill et al.(2001). Group numbers refer to groups reported by Underhill et al.(2001). The frequency values in parentheses correspond to the subclassification of the haplotype defined only by the M89 mutation in the report by Underhill et al.(2000).


"In Somali males, 14 haplogroups were identified. The frequency of the clade E3b was 81.1%, including 77.6% of the haplogroup E3b1 defined by the M78 mutation. The Eurasian haplogroup K2 was found in 10.4%, and 3.0% of the Somali Y chromosomes belonged to the major clade J."





Map of African areas where E3b1 cluster has been observed (the numbers of individuals are given in parentheses).10 (1) Moroccan Arabs (54), (2) Northern Egyptians (21), (3) Ethiopian Jews (22), (4) Ethiopian Amharas (34), (5) Ethiopian Wolaytas (12), (6) Mixed Ethiopians (12), (7) Ethiopian Oromos (25), (8) Somalia (224 including our Somali data), (9) Boranas (Oromos) from Kenya (seven), (10) Bantus from Kenya (28), (11) Tuaregs from Niger (22). The haplogroups or remaining paragroups are represented by different fill patterns. Lineages excluded from a haplogroup are listed within parentheses after the name of the haplogroup. The distribution of the Cushitic language in East Africa is shown in grey.

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by argyle104:
You people are sick.

I really hope that its just a few people who are using sockpuppets talking to themselves. Even though that is crazy within itself, it still pales to the craziness of the loons, Zarahan, Sundiata, Djehuti, Ish Gebor, etc obsessing about race, looks, and acting like Africans are some kind of sideshow exhibit.


Don't you losers have a life?

---

It's you and your dick sucking boy friend who are race obsessed and ignoring the diversity of African phenotypes. Calling Africans Caucasians? Ignoring studies and other facial features amongst Africans, other than the one you keep showing.

And I can spend my time how ever I like it, when I like it, dimwit!

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova:
^^Rahotep Hypocrite, what's taking you so long in providing
proof of 'true' whites -blond haired, blue-eyed
ancient Egyptians?

Like the true hypocrite you are, you
never apply your own model in reverse to whites.
You want to use proghathism as a 'true negro' marker
but don't likewise define 'true white' markers.
Show us some authentic blond, blue-eyed ancient
Egyptians, not Middle Easterners, not Asiatics,
but Egyptians looking like true white people, with
blond hair and blue eyes.

Don't tell us that white people vary in looks.
If you do you are a hypocrite because you deny
that blacks should inherently vary in how they look.
So let's apply your own standard consistently
across the board hypocrite. Don't run away.
Show true blond, blue-eyed white Egyptians.
Posting pictures of dark Italians or Turks will
show you up as the hypocrite you are. It won't
do, because you also deny that black people could
vary in their looks. Let's have one true negro
model and one true white model.

Apply your same hypocritical methods and let's
see what you got. Produce ancient Egyptians
looking like white Brittney Spears, or white
Robert Redford for example. They have to be
blond, and white skinned, and blue eyed which
is a clear marker of Caucasians.


What's taking so long hypocrite?

---

Real whites have no lips, like these.








Like these,



Not like these,

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova:
^^Rahotep Hypocrite, what's taking you so long in providing
proof of 'true' whites -blond haired, blue-eyed
ancient Egyptians?

Like the true hypocrite you are, you
never apply your own model in reverse to whites.
You want to use proghathism as a 'true negro' marker
but don't likewise define 'true white' markers.
Show us some authentic blond, blue-eyed ancient
Egyptians, not Middle Easterners, not Asiatics,
but Egyptians looking like true white people, with
blond hair and blue eyes.

Don't tell us that white people vary in looks.
If you do you are a hypocrite because you deny
that blacks should inherently vary in how they look.
So let's apply your own standard consistently
across the board hypocrite. Don't run away.
Show true blond, blue-eyed white Egyptians.
Posting pictures of dark Italians or Turks will
show you up as the hypocrite you are. It won't
do, because you also deny that black people could
vary in their looks. Let's have one true negro
model and one true white model.

Apply your same hypocritical methods and let's
see what you got. Produce ancient Egyptians
looking like white Brittney Spears, or white
Robert Redford for example. They have to be
blond, and white skinned, and blue eyed which
is a clear marker of Caucasians.


What's taking so long hypocrite?

---

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Brada-Anansi:
Ish and Zarahan you guys had your fun he been beat down compromised, turnt the hell out..show mercy?? or NOT!!..

---

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Britney is not really white, she has brown eyes. And I do see some dark hair at the root.

---

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by argyle104:

This forum has absolutely no intellectual value. There is no one here who posts daily or regularly that I take the time to read.


This forum has more value from a psychiatric frame. If you are a psychiatric professional, student, or just an ordinary person this forum provides a variety of specimens to observe, analyze, and diagnose pathologically. [/QB]

---

Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

LOL

There is nothing one can do except laugh at all the insanity here and what else can you expect but insanity from a racist and thus senseless thread.

As for this "Baenra", whether or not he is Phoenician7, its obvious he is one of those distorters who loves to cite select parts of his sources while failing to show the rest.

"A brief comment on dental occlusion or malocclusion and facial types is appropriate. In general, perhaps owing to extremem wear, the dentition of ancient Egyptians (Old Kingdom) and ancient Nubians rarely exhibited dental crowding. The latter, in fact, tended to have congenitally missing teeth more reequently than supernumerary teeth (Harris and Ponitz 1996). Most modern Egyptians have good molar relationships with moderate to severe crowding, If, however the queens of the New Kingdom period (early Eighteenth Dynasty) are examined by x-ray cephalometry, many resemble modern Europeans or Americans, with maxillary, or upper jaw prognathism. This condition may be either hereditary or environmental, i.e., the result of thumb sucking or other oral habits. Queen Ahmose Nefertiry is an excellent example of this type of occlusion." (Mummies, Disease & Ancient Cultures; Cockburn, Cockburn, Reyman)

But then...

Harris and Wente note the prevalence of dental prognathism among Nubians. Often this is combined with malocclusion. Similar incidence can be found in other African peoples. For example, one study found that a sample taken from the Kenya showed 61.3% of Maasai had diastema; 84% of Kikuyu had overbite and 99% had overjet; and 24% of Kalenjin had anterior open bite. (J. Hassanali, GP Pokhariyal, "Anterior tooth relations in Kenyan Africans, Archives of Oral Biology 38 [Apr 1993] 337-42). Although these dental traits can often be acquired through habits like thumb-sucking, as noted by Harris and Wente, the high frequency in the royal mummies indicates a genetic origin as found in Africans.
http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Temple/9845/mummies.htm


"The theory that the Badarian originated in the south is, however, no longer accepted." Oxford History Of Ancient Egypt Shaw, 2003

LOL Whether the Badarian originated in the south or whether it was local still does not change the fact that the Badari like **all** cultures in Egypt like Egypt **itself** is AFRICAN.

Here is what the rest of the source says:

"The origins of the Badarian are equally problematic. It seems that the Badarian Culture did not appear from a single source although the Western Desert was probably the predominant one."

"The fact that the material culture of the Naqada culture was later found in northern Egypt with no Nubian elements would also seem to argue against any Nubian origin for the Egyptian state." Oxford History of Ancient Egypt Shaw 2003.

I find this statement by Shaw here to be a non-sequitor. He specifically says that Naqada culture was later found in northern Egypt obviously implying that the culture was earlier found in southern Egypt where it originated, as he states so elsewhere. The fact that the variant found in the north has no Nubian elements but the earlier one in the south did does not refute its Nubian origins!

Here is what Shaw also stated.

"The existence of a still earlier culture called the Tasian (Deir Tasa) has been claimed. The culture would have been characterized by the presence of calcium beakers with incised designs which are also known from contexts of similar date in Neolithic Sudan. The existence however of the Tasian as a chronologically or culturally seperated unit has never been demonstrated beyond doubt. Although most scholars consider the Tasian to be simply part of the Badarian Culture it has also been argued that the Tasian represents the continuation of a Lower Egyptian tradition which would be the immediate predecessor of the Naqada I Culture. This seems however implausible first because similarities with the Lower Egyptian Neolithic cultures are not convincing and secondly because of the Tasian's obvious ceramic links with the Sudan. If the Tasian must be considered as a seperate cultural entity then it might represent a nomadic culture with a Sudanese background and which interacted with the Badarian Culture."

Then the idiot cited:

While there is evidence for Eastern Desert influence on the Badarian culture (Majer 1992), Midant-Reynes (2000: 148, 164) convincingly argues for a strong element of Saharan culture:
“With regards to lithics, [Holmes (1989: 183)] points out that there are some similarities
with the post-Palaeolithic culture in the Sahara (an industry based on blades and flakes,in which polished axes and hollow-base arrowheads are not lacking), which means that we cannot exclude the possibility that the semicircle formed by the Bahariya, Farafra, Dakhla and Kharga oases might have been the point of origin of populations who perhaps already pursued a pastoral mode of subsistence; these people might have been pushed eastwards by increasing aridity and would eventually have settled in the region of Asyut and Tahta . . . [It] might even be suggested that the Neolithic cultures of the oases and the Faiyum could be regarded as the eastern fringes of the Sahara Neolithic groups.”

Okay?? We are well aware of the Saharan region as the hearth of Egyptian cultures. Are you not aware that it was also the hearth of many cultures in Sub-Sahara?? After all, there was NO Sahara desert at that time which means no such division of African populations into "North" and "Sub-Saharan"!

The period when sub-Saharan Africa was most influential in Egypt was a time when neither Egypt, as we understand it culturally, nor the Sahara, as we understand it geographically, existed. Populations and cultures now found south of the desert roamed far to the north. The culture of Upper Egypt, which became dynastic Egyptian civilization, could fairly be called a Sudanese transplant. Egypt rapidly found a method of disciplining the river, the land, and the people to transform the country into a titanic garden. Egypt rapidly developed detailed cultural forms that dwarfed its forebears in urbanity and elaboration. Thus, when new details arrived, they were rapidly adapted to the vast cultural superstructure already present. On the other hand, pharaonic culture was so bound to its place near the Nile that its huge, interlocked religious, administrative, and formal structures could not be readily transferred to relatively mobile cultures of the desert, savanna, and forest. The influence of the mature pharaonic civilizations of Egypt and Kush was almost confined to their sophisticated trade goods and some significant elements of technology. Nevertheless, the religious substratum of Egypt and Kush was so similar to that of many cultures in southern Sudan today that it remains possible that fundamental elements derived from the two high cultures to the north live on.--Joseph O. Vogel (1997)

quote:

---

the deepest genetic layer in North Africa seems to be mtDNA haplogroup U6, that is related with other U clades of West, Central and South Eurasia.

---

quote:

---

“The Aterian goes back at least 145,000 years,”. European connection? Some features, such as the molars, of these 40,000-year old specimens from Romania resemble those of earlier North African hominins. Was North Africa The Launch Pad For Modern Human Migrations? 2011

---

Again, why are you associating Europeans with a time period when there were NO Eurasians at all, let alone Europeans?!! LMAO

The rest of your nonsense was already debunked by the other guys. So I'll leave that alone.

Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

Actually this is a True Caucasian..maybe they should be called "Above Mediteranian Europeans" or Blancos??




^^^^
The Whitest Skin, the Thinnest lips, Palest Eyes etc.

quote:

---

Originally posted by anguishofbeing:


^ true Caucasian right there.

---

Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by anguishofbeing:


^ true Caucasian right there.

---

No, not so. Real Caucasians have red hair and freckles with pale skin, including the very thin lips (as shown previously). And males usually have very hairy bodies.

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-:
Actually this is a True Caucasian..




^^^^
The Whitest Skin, the Thinnest lips, Palest Eyes etc.

quote:

---

Originally posted by anguishofbeing:


^ true Caucasian right there.

---

---

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Brada-Anansi:
Rahotep

quote:

---

From now on let the descendants of these people: believe that the ancient Egyptian were the same as themselves... Whereas these dubious characters:

---

Kinda like this guy after all you did say their descendants.

---

Posts: 870 | From: uk | Registered: Apr 2011  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by the lioness:
Originally posted by argyle104:

This forum has absolutely no intellectual value. There is no one here who posts daily or regularly that I take the time to read.


This forum has more value from a psychiatric frame. If you are a psychiatric professional, student, or just an ordinary person this forum provides a variety of specimens to observe, analyze, and diagnose pathologically.

---

quote:

---

the lost sheep need your guidance

---

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-:
^^^LOL I noticed that. Yeah if there is a True Caucasian it would be the Redhead or MC1R carriers as they have the whitest skin and features. Though if im not mistaken their hair is thicker than non Red Hair Europeans. But then again thin hair is an Asian trait.

---

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by rahotep101:
This is a true Caucasian, as this is what the indigenous people of the Caucasus look like. It is also quite similar to what many Egyptuians look like.

---

Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by rahotep101:
The idea that Caucasians have to be red hair or blue eyed is nonsense

---

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by DaDumb1:

Egyptians resembled Egyptians, who often resemble Armenians and Georgians, ergo true Caucasians...

---

The only Egyptians who resemble Armenians and Georgians are those of Armenian and Georgian descent you idiot!! Or do you deny the influx of Caucasian peoples from the Caucasus into Egypt during the Ottoman period??!

Your knowledge of Egypt's population history is seriously lacking! I suggest you do research on the subject!! This belief of yours that modern Egyptians look the same as the ancient especially those living in northern Delta communities is ridiculous bullocks! Even the Egyptians of those communities acknowledge their own foreign ancestry!! LOL

Even Ausar (a REAL Egyptian) has commented on the fact that people of the northern Delta are of obvious foreign descent not only due to their obvious physical appearance but also their accents and their surnames. For example the surname 'Abaza' is Circassian (from the Caucasus) and the Abazas trace their immigration during the Ottoman Empire! The Copts of Alexandria are a much older community however they are not indigenous either as they are the descendants of Greco-Roman colonialists as Alexandria itself was a Greek colonial city founded by Alexander! These communities received more recent input from their Greek kinsmen during the Ottoman period as well which is why many have Greek surnames such as 'Anastios'.

So all these bogus claims of yours are nothing but LIES. Get over it!

Mind you Ausar who is from southern Egypt is not the only REAL Egyptian here. There is another poster who goes by 'Multisphinx' who is from the Delta region and let's just say like Ausar he is not at all afraid to proclaim his BLACK AFRICAN identity and tell you khawagas (foreigners) off!

Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Calabooz':

quote:

---

Originally posted by rahotep101:
The idea that Caucasians have to be red hair or blue eyed is nonsense

---

And the idea that blacks have to have thick lips, prognathism or curly hair is equally nonsensical.

Egyptians resembled Africans. Not people of the Caucasus. Therefore they were not "Caucasians".

---

Are you sure about that?
Georgians:




Egyptians:



Ancient Egyptians:




Clearly it would have been impossible for a Semitic Jew like Moses to be mistaken for an Egyptian, then... Not according to Exodus 2...



Africans who do not have prognathism, frizzy hair or thick lips (and who are not darker than might be expected, given the climates they inhabit), are hardly blacks, are they? The Darker southern Egyptians still tend to look more like their northern compatriots in terms of phenotype than they do like sub-saharan Africans, and Egyptians are more related to each other than anyone else.

Posts: 870 | From: uk | Registered: Apr 2011  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

And I repeat.

quote:

---

Originally posted by DaDumb1:

Egyptians resembled Egyptians, who often resemble Armenians and Georgians, ergo true Caucasians...

---

The only Egyptians who resemble Armenians and Georgians are those of Armenian and Georgian descent you idiot!! Or do you deny the influx of Caucasian peoples from the Caucasus into Egypt during the Ottoman period??!

Your knowledge of Egypt's population history is seriously lacking! I suggest you do research on the subject!! This belief of yours that modern Egyptians look the same as the ancient especially those living in northern Delta communities is ridiculous bullocks! Even the Egyptians of those communities acknowledge their own foreign ancestry!! LOL

Even Ausar (a REAL Egyptian) has commented on the fact that people of the northern Delta are of obvious foreign descent not only due to their obvious physical appearance but also their accents and their surnames. For example the surname 'Abaza' is Circassian (from the Caucasus) and the Abazas trace their immigration during the Ottoman Empire! The Copts of Alexandria are a much older community however they are not indigenous either as they are the descendants of Greco-Roman colonialists as Alexandria itself was a Greek colonial city founded by Alexander! These communities received more recent input from their Greek kinsmen during the Ottoman period as well which is why many have Greek surnames such as 'Anastios'.

So all these bogus claims of yours are nothing but LIES. Get over it!

Mind you Ausar who is from southern Egypt is not the only REAL Egyptian here. There is another poster who goes by 'Multisphinx' who is from the Delta region and let's just say like Ausar he is not at all afraid to proclaim his BLACK AFRICAN identity and tell you khawagas (foreigners) off!

Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by Siptah:
^ Oh please!

Countless amount of research, along with the self portrayals of Dynastic Egyptians has shown the vast majority of Ancient Egyptians to be dark skinned and not light skinned. Simply because you can cherry-pick away and make some cheesy comparisons doesn't change this fact.

---

Posts: 1502 | From: Dies Irae | Registered: Oct 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Calabooz':
He just doesn't care, he'll just keep repeating the same stuff regardless of what data we provide him with

---

Posts: 4021 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                   

quote:

---

Truthcentric: Where's the full citation?

---

quote:

---

Zaharan: He doesn't post the full citation because it has been debunked here before at ES as to his racial claims. He is spamming it across the web, even on forums like downloadpolitics.com

---

quote:

---

Calaboz: Not sure what the heck they're basing this on- no doubt some form of bias.

---

Posts: 6 | Registered: Jun 2011  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Brada-Anansi:
Rahotep

quote:

---

From now on let the descendants of these people: believe that the ancient Egyptian were the same as themselves... Whereas these dubious characters:

---

Kinda like this guy after all you did say their descendants.

---

If I eva...lolololol....whoii Brada yuh nuh easy...lol....

Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by Baenra:
In other words, you can't refute it.

---

quote:

---

Funny, I don't recall you fully citing any of the studies you post.

---

quote:

---

In fact, the only thing you constantly spam is the Keita chart based on 12-15 variables. Howells is based on 57 variables and worldwide comparisons so don't make me laugh.

---

quote:

---

Seeking a well intentioned, respectable forum with higher standards, much higher standards.

---

Posts: 7069 | From: Fallbrook, CA | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ish Gebor:
Real whites have no lips, like these.

---

where is his upper lip- he has none?




Is why they do this to themSelves enuh:





They pay nuff money to have what we are born with Naturally (thanks to our Africanness)....

Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

quote:Originally posted by rahotep101:
The idea that Caucasians have to be red hair or blue eyed is nonsense

---

Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008  |  IP: Logged |