Even his white friends cant believe how dumb this guy is
One of the comments
quote:ergo
Typically, when people don't know what the **** they're talking about they will either admit ignorance and just don't say anything. This idiot decided to keep talking while showing everyone he doesn't know what the **** he's talking about.
sounds familiar doesn't it
LOL! Seriously why do you all debate this dummy. He or She is stuck on stupid. He or She see the world with racist eyes, already has its mind made up. " Don't argue with fools, because from a distant you can't tell who is who." Even his own kin call him a dummy.
Posts: 197 | From: 5th Dynasty Abusir Temple | Registered: Jul 2007
| IP: Logged |
Who doesn't know that INDIANS ARE SOME AH DI BIGGEST BLEACHERS!
PLEASE NOTE THE PICTURE ABOVE SAYS: ASIAN AND ARABIC SKIN (the 'Arabs' dem are bleaching too)...
smh
Its a dam shame, the lengths people go, when they lose a sense of self. The white social construct is bleeding the world of all its purity
Posts: 197 | From: 5th Dynasty Abusir Temple | Registered: Jul 2007
| IP: Logged |
"Pure white evolution led to Neanderthals both in terms of paler skin and cold-adaptive limb proportions. African evolution led to anatomically modern humans.
QUOTE: "What was different about the Neanderthals? What did the Cro- Magnons think when they saw them for the first time? To begin with, the Neanderthals were very light-skinned and the Cro- Magnons were less so. " --Juan Luis Arsuaga, Andy Klatt. 2004. The Neanderthal's Necklace: In Search of the First Thinkers
"This finding suggests that Neanderthals evolved a functional variant of the MC1R gene independently from modern humans as they dispersed into northerly latitudes, and thus supports the inference for the convergent evolution of depigmented skin in the Neanderthals lineage.." --Michael P. Muehlenbein. 2010. Human Evolutionary Biology
"Regarding environmental buffering, Trinkaus (1986 and this volume) reiterates that while Neanderthal limb proportions are suggestive of cold adaptation, no such indications are shown by Eurasian early modern humans. Their distinct limb proportions are instead indicative of an equatorial ancestry and better culturally based thermal protection.. the limb proportions of the Eurasian early modern samples are retentions of the African ancestral morphology of long limbs with long distal segments.." -- Erik Trinkaus (ed), 'The Emergence of Modern Humans", (C. Stringer p. 88). School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1989.
Modern scholarship shows a great 3-way evolutionary split in hominid lineages s several hundred thousand years ago. European hominids evolved into Neanderthals. Asians into Homo Erectus. Africans went on to evolve into today's advanced anatomically modern humans.
QUOTE: "Following the initial Out-of-Africa event, natural selection and random genetic drift began to drive populations in Africa, Europe, and eastern Asia in different morphological directions. Morphological differentiation was particularly clear by 500,000–400,000 years ago, and from this time onwards, there were at least three evolving human lineages. These may always have been able to exchange genes, but distance and small population size probably limited gene flow, and the composite fossil and archeological records indicate that the African lineage spread to replace or swamp the others beginning roughly 50,000 years ago. It is thus r easonable to supply the lineages with biological species labels: Homo sapiens in Africa, Homo neanderthalensis in Europe, and Homo erectus in the eastern Asia.
.. Many details of Out-of-Africa remain to be worked out, and disagreement persists, for example, on the extent to which dispersing modern Africans and archaic Eurasians may have interbred and especially on what promoted the relatively sudden Out-of-Africa expansion. Most authorities attribute the expansion to behavioral changes that conferred a substantial Darwinian fitness advantage, that is, that allowed modern humans of African descent t o survive and reproduce at a significantly higher rate than the archaic humans they encountered in Eurasia. "
-- Richard G. Klein. 2009. Darwin and the recent African origin of modern humas Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 September 22; 106(38): 16007–16009.
Some white "Racial Reality" or "biodiversity" proponents argue for European descent from NEanderthals "untainted" by Africa- a lily white "pure" line of white evolution.
Fine. Lets go with their approach for a moment. ----------------------------------------------------
Using the biodiversity approacht, we see then that the first whites were cold-adapted Neanderthals that failed to progress beyond the Stone Age despite a sometimes favorable environment with rich resources available (Lewin 1994). Ice Age Europe was not a cold hell but had variable climate and rich forest, woodland and aquatic resources, including ancient variants of wheat-like spelt and chick peas in place that could have been domesticated, along with ancestors of sheep, cattle and pigs, and a favorable East-West climatic axis that could have aided domestication. Despite tens of thousands of years with these advantages and resources however, white lineages failed to move beyond the Stone Age.
Thus, using the "biodiversity" approach, the first great "racial" split in the humanoid line involved white Neanderthals who colonized Europe, and Africans, who colonized Africa and went on to become anatomically modern humans.
The first “pure” white genetic output was thus brutish, primitive, dead end Neanderthals. By contrast, it was Africa that produced the future of humanity- anatomically modern humans, not cold-climate Europe. White NEanderthals survived, until they were supplanted by more advanced, modern tropically adapted humans from Africa that mingled with and replaced them. This would be the first instance of the hybridization that produced today's white Europeans. It was the coming of tropically adapted African variants into Europe that caused Europe to progress beyond the brutish “pure” white Neanderthal lineages. Continuing migrations from Africa and a mixture of African and Asian OOA migrants- all anatomically modern humans- caused a second round of mixed breeding in EUrope, and was to eventually replace the pure white Neanderthal lineages to yield today's European hybrid population. QUOTE:
^^"There is wide agreement on a speciation event in Africa at around 0.8 or 0.9 mya when Homo erectus (or Homo ergaster) gave rise to a species named Homo heidelbergensis, or Homo rhodesiensis, or Homo sapiens. The new species expanded into Europe leading to the Neanderthal lineage, whereas in Africa it evolved into anatomically modern humans. The lineage of anatomical modernization can be subdivided into three groups, morphs, or grades: an early one including Bodo, Saldanha, Kabwe, Salé, a subsequent one including Florisbad, Laetoli H 18, Ileret (ER 3884), Jebel Irhoud, and early anatomically moderns with Omo Kibish, Herto and others." --Günter Bräuer, "Middle Pleistocene Diversity in Africa and the Origin of Modern Humans". IN: Modern Origins: A North African Perspective. 2012. Series: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Hublin, Jean-Jacques; McPherron, Shannon P. (Eds.)
And
” Holliday (2000) examined postcranial morphology of the varied Levantine hominids from Qafzeh and Skhul(anatomically modern) and from Amud, Kebara and Tabun (Neanderthal). He determined that they were morphologically distinct; the anatomically moderns had tropically adapted body proportions, suggesting African origins, while the Neanderthals had cold adapted body proportions, suggesting European origins.” --Holliday 2000
This then could be another source of the Eurocentric inferiority complex. Pure white genetics produced only the savage Neanderthals. Africa by contrast, produced a better, more advanced human than white lineages. Today's whites still show some traces of Neanderthal genes, a throwback to their savage evolution. Some white writers argue that this Neanderthal remnant, could account for the white penchant for violence and murder. R. Bradley, advances this this theory in "The Iceman Inheritance."
So under this biodiversity approach, why then didn't pure white Europeans stay as NEanderthals? According to Bradley, they were replaced with the more advanced Africans and Asians. This diluted the savage white NEanderthal lineages, producing a better level of humanity. However the violent, savage nature of whites still remains, due to remnants of Neanderthal genes. Recent scientific findings showing European whites have traces of Neanderthal genes have been used by some claimants to support the Iceman theory. Some disagree with Bradley. Others argue that his theory of white ice age adaptation is true. Racial "biodiversity" proponents share general agreement along a spectrum with its central holding of pure white evolutionary lineages, "untainted" by "negro blood."
White European lineages [Neanderthals] were the first humans to engage in cannibalism
"Cannibalism is a good example. Several Mousterian sites, along which Moula-Guercy (France) stands out, have provided reasonably firm evidence of anthropic action on Neanderthal bones.. Defleur and colleagues (1999) compared the patters of ungulate and Neanderthal bones, the skeletal parts that were found and the tool marks on the bone fragments. They concluded that all the fragments with marks indicate prey that had been subject to butchery. This suggests that cannibalistic oractices existed among the Neanderthals.. But the question of cannibalism can be understood in another way. When Wolpoff was asked about the meaning of the evidence found at Moula-Guercy, he replied with a question: why should modern humans be the only violent ones? Arsuaga went even further in believing that Neanderthal cannibalistic behavior actually constituted a very human behavior, which revealed a human mind (Both cited by Culotta, 1999). " --Camilo J. Cela-Conde, Francisco José Ayala, 2007. Human evolution: trails from the past.
"But recent excavation by Alban Delfeur and Tim White at the 100,000 year old French cave of Moula-Guercy has demonstrated cannibalism beyond any reasonable doubt. The site contains butchered animal remains, predominantly red deer. Among the bones are the skulls of two young Neanderthals, their masseter muscles filleted and the tongue removed from at least one of them; the cut marks on the inner face of the mandible are virtually identical with those mode on the inside of the 12,5000-year-old modern human mandible from Gough's (New) Cave, [England] described in Chapter 3 (see p. 80). Crania of both deer and Neanderthals were broken open to get at the marrow.." --Timothy Taylor. 2005. The Buried Soul: How Humans Invented Death
[b]Pure white lineages failed to move beyond the stone Age in Europe, despite the supposed greater ":challenges" of "cold climate" "evolution."
QUOTE: [i]The last Ice Age was by no means a period of unrelieved cold, millennium after millennium. Temperatures fluctuated, sometimes coming close to today's balmy interglacial climes, and the animal and plant communities fluctuated in concert with them. Warmer climes brought woodland and forest where only open grassland had existed previously. At the same time, the horses and bison- animals of the plains, were replaced with red deer, wild boar and other confines of a forest habitat..
".. Opportunities for cultivation and animal husbandry surely existed earlier than the Neolithic. Yet no evidence has emerged that any plant or animal domestication occurred before this time.." -- Lewin, Roger (1988). In the Age of Mankind. Smithsonian. pp. 193
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Where are you casselrides....It it too much for you,Now we are getting light skin people from India,Bleach please. How sad that people hate themselves and their skin color just to be part of the mixed hybrid world of european nuts.
Posts: 45 | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by GOMTUU: Where are you casselrides....It it too much for you,Now we are getting light skin people from India,Bleach please. How sad that people hate themselves and their skin color just to be part of the mixed hybrid world of european nuts.
him run gone like most mangy curr when dem get ah good kick tuh dem rass....
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:it doesn't help when idiots like yourself make stupid threads like this
@asante-korton
No need for the hostility i'm new to these forums and I just wanted to ask a question I had no idea it would turn into this.
you know that race doesn't exist yet you still asked a question on whether it did? im sorry but that is just plain stupid
Posts: 1064 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:you know that race doesn't exist yet you still asked a question on whether it did? im sorry but that is just plain stupid
first I was wondering that if all africans are gentically closer to each other annd have mostly the same features shouldn't that be classified as race.
Besides i said forgive for any unintentional stupidty.
Posts: 24 | From: ATL | Registered: Feb 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:simple mind, let's get a bit deeper, how did Europeans got white?lol
Caucasoids and Mongoloids evolved their bone structure through the Eurasian environment (which caused greater sexual selection) which also changed their diet. It's also why they have higher intelligence.
Negroids in contrast have retained very primitive, bestial features - especially in the face. This isn't racism, its just anthropology. I could give you tuns and tuns and data, but you would just reject it. Truth is though, you know i'm right. Based on your picture spams, i can see you admit Caucasoid traits (thinner noses, wavy-straight hair) are the most attractive. Have you noticed that Truthandright's threads on ''black beauty'' get no replies?
The above reply was apparently written under lioness' account, but note the typical "Abaza" style- quote: "Negroids in contrast have retained very primitive, bestial features.."Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: What is clear there is confusion on WHEN humans became depigmented. Dr. Wells proposes 40ky. Jablonski proposes about 6-12kya. Clearly there is disagreement among white scholars. There is also disagreement on WHY and HOW.
In others words they do NOT know. But as I said many times. I am with Dr. Mekova, Kittles(current)etc.
It is also clear the Steppes played an important part.
BTW - we know now that cited study(above) is outdated. SLCA45 is just ONE of many genes that interact to produce depigementation .. . or pigmentation.
Original albinism did not occur naturally by selection. If it did, it was due to some extraordinary environmental change such as what Dr. Winters has proposed, I.E, Long term subterranean dwelling, or hundreds of years living in a deep dark cave.
One thing is certain and that is the Vitamin D nonsense is pure BS. Blacks have been living in UK, US, and Europe for many hundreds of years, yet they have not lost their pigment and acquire Vitamin D in these environments just fine.
OCA originates from Africa, which strongly suggests the mutation is the result of some extraordinary past cosmic event (Massive Solar flare, Meteor impact, etc) with energy released that exceeded the maximum radiation threshold of DNA's melanin protection shell. African history probably had verbal records of such an event, but unfortunately verbal recording of history is a piss poor method of long term storage.
Posts: 4693 | From: Saturn | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova:
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides:
quote:simple mind, let's get a bit deeper, how did Europeans got white?lol
Caucasoids and Mongoloids evolved their bone structure through the Eurasian environment (which caused greater sexual selection) which also changed their diet. It's also why they have higher intelligence.
Negroids in contrast have retained very primitive, bestial features - especially in the face. This isn't racism, its just anthropology. I could give you tuns and tuns and data, but you would just reject it. Truth is though, you know i'm right. Based on your picture spams, i can see you admit Caucasoid traits (thinner noses, wavy-straight hair) are the most attractive. Have you noticed that Truthandright's threads on ''black beauty'' get no replies?
The above reply was apparently written under lioness' account, but note the typical "Abaza" style- quote: "Negroids in contrast have retained very primitive, bestial features.."
No it's not written under my account
my only account is the lioness,
The above is written under an account called
_______________
the lioness is a guy IRL
Member Member # 18409
______________
^^^ not my account obviously
If somebody made an account called " zarahan is a homo" is it a good assumption that you made it or is it a good assumption that somebody else made it?
If you see somebody quoting "cass" look at the source of remark. It's under "the lioness is a guy IRL "
that means originally the post was made by cass and he changed his member name to "the lioness is a guy IRL "
That was when cassisertides returned briefly as "cass" but was using his old account the was originally the ful name "Cassisertides"
Around that time I made a thread detailing all the old cassertides aka Anglo_pyramidologist aliases
He got mad and changed his cassidertides account to "the lioness is a guy IRL " to get revenge on me
Then months later he came back as a new name"Gor" and then quickly changed it to "Dead" That was a new account not the old cassidertides account that he changed to "the lioness is a guy IRL "
In summary if you wnat to see all the old cassiertides posts go to "the lioness is a guy IRL "
You will notice there is nobody quoting "the lioness is a guy IRL " to reply. The replies are to "cass" but you won't see cass in the thread. What happens is that the new name changes all the old threads --BUT when people reply and they use a quote from the member who changed their name the name remains the same because they own the post not the person who is quoted.
And no cass aka Dead aka Anglo_Pyramidologist is not ABAZA
Dead, cass and Anglo_Pyramidologist are all the same person
The cass account as I have shown is "the lioness is a guy IRL " His other separate account is Thule
^^^ Again, notice when a person quotes Thule it says "Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist:"
That is beacause Dead has a lot of separate accounts on ES His cass account is now "the lioness is a guy IRL " His Anglo_Pyramidologist account is now Thule
Take a note of this
and stop the " I think he may be ABAZA" or the " I think he may be White Nubian"
He has other names as well but not those So please don't start rumors without proof I looked into those people, they are not him
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
like most mangy curr when dem get ah good kick tuh dem rass....
Printer-friendly view of this topic