quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
You don't believe that Whites have a right to living space for ourselves, nor according to you do our children have any right to a future.
You are like a drone. Or indoctrinated individual with no valid argument. So you keep repeating this mantra as if it is the omniscient truth. LOL SHM
Where in America (or anywhere else )whites don't have space? How does this apply to Americas geography and demography. LOL
What indicates that white children have no future? lol What are blacks doing to permit whites (children) from having "a future"?
quote:Is the dramatic rise in autism tapering off?
The theory holds that the CDC has covered up vital data and committed fraud. It’s based on concerns that a CDC scientist, William Thompson, raised about a study that he and several colleagues published in the journal Pediatrics in 2004.
Thompson, who has been hailed in the anti-vaccine community as a whistleblower, has said he believes the study omitted data that would have shown a link between a certain vaccine and autism in certain African-American boys.
That’s right. “Vaxxed” promotes the unsubstantiated claim that the CDC covered up crucial data about a purported link between vaccines and autism.
Here’s the backstory: One of the CDC researchers who co-authored a 2004 study that found no link between vaccines and autism harbored concerns about the way the analysis was conducted.
A decade later, he shared his concerns with the anti-vaccine activist Brian Hooker, who along with Wakefield began to promote the idea of a coverup.
As the conspiracy theory grew, the CDC researcher, William Thompson, came forward with a public statement. He said he wanted to make “absolutely clear” that he believes vaccines save lives and that he would never advise a parent not to vaccinate. Yet he said data had been omitted from the study that would have showed an increased risk for autism among African-American boys who received the MMR vaccine before age 3.
[...]
Those are serious accusations. Could it be fraud?
There’s no reason to think so. Let’s go through the many problems with the conspiracy theory.
Nobody has produced evidence that the CDC covered up anything. The CDC makes the raw data from the study available to researchers to analyze, and no credible scientists have raised an alarm.
There’s also no compelling biological explanation why African-American boys would be the only group at increased risk for autism. The smaller the subgroup you’re analyzing, the more likely you are to stumble across false positives.
Hooker, the anti-vaccine activist, did his own analysis of the raw data, looking at all African-American kids, not just those with Georgia birth certificates. He found that black boys who were vaccinated before age 3 were 3.4 times more likely to have autism than those who weren’t. The journal Translational Neurodegeneration published his study, then quickly retracted it, citing concerns about Hooker’s “competing interests” and the validity of his methods and statistics.
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
You yourself said that Whites should be mixed into extinction (genocide).
Doxie, again, the discussion back then was hypothetical.
The question addressed was:
"What is worse whites creating unjust systems to rid POC, or mix with POC. Your proposal is what exactly...?"
However, still no answer till this day. Only the same repetitive crazy rant, we can read all over the forum.
Anyway, I said, you will remain human after all if you mix with POC.
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
You have a problem with a few Whites being in Africa (even though they are being slaughtered like cattle there,being denied an education for White children, not allowed to own a business,being denied employment for being White,having no charities to help if you are poor & White,being denied medical care even if critically injured or critically ill for being White) ...
This was a crazy long windy sentence with no breaks.lol But all stupidity as usually.
There are just as many whites in Africa as there are blacks in Africa. There are more whites in "POC countries' than there are POC's in "white countries". LOL
It just happens that the bulk of whites in Africa lives in Southern Africa, due to colonialism, where they denied indigenous people their rights and slaughtered them like cattle. And from a capital perspective whites still rule over these people with nifty racist systems, which they inherited from their racist ancestors. So there goes your argument: "not allowed to own business", out off the window, down the drain into the sewer, where it belongs.
And I don't see how whites are being denied access to education. It's the first time I heard of this EVER!!! If anything it was white rule who did this to blacks in South Africa. Speaking of being denied medical care, these POC children were shot at by armed policemen and sometimes killed. There are documentaries on this. lol
Due to these previous racist policies by whites, creating Townships, South Africa became marginalized in poverty. This poverty led to high crime rates. This high crime rate is now on everybody in South Africa, including whites in South Africa. Yes, whites are not excluded. Meaning the crime rate in general is high in South Africa, due to prior policies by whites.
So, let's read some more about white supremacy around the globe and what it has caused.
quote:"Apartheid educational policies condemned black South Africans to a severely overcrowded school system with educational policies designed to limit achievement.”
--Anthony Appiah, Henry Louis Gates
Encyclopedia of Africa (2010)
quote: Hector Pieterson (1964 – June 16, 1976) became the iconic image of the 1976 Soweto Uprising in apartheid South Africa when a news photograph by Sam Mzima of the dying Hector being carried by a fellow student, was published around the world. He was killed at the age of 12 when the police opened fire on protesting students.
--Sam Mzima
June 16, 1976
National Archive of South Africa. Permission granted in terms of Section 1(xiv) of the National Archives of South Africa Act, 1996 (Act No.43 of 1996).
quote:Apartheid was a system of government in South Africa, abolished in 1994, which systematically separated groups on the basis of race classification. The Apartheid system of racial segregation was made law in South Africa in 1948, when the country was officially divided into four racial groups, White, Black, Indian and Coloureds (or people of mixed race, or non-Whites who did not fit into the other non-White categories). ‘Homelands’ were created for Blacks, and when they lived outside of the homelands with Whites, non-Whites could not vote and had separate schools and hospitals, and even beaches where they could swim or park benches they could sit on.
A Brief History of Educational Inequality from Apartheid to the Present
quote: The Apartheid system created educational inequalities through overt racist policies (see timeline). The Bantu Education Act of 1952 ensured that Blacks receive an education that would limit educational potential and remain in the working class (UCT).
quote: With the enactment of apartheid laws in 1948, racial discrimination was institutionalized. Race laws touched every aspect of social life, including a prohibition of marriage between non-whites and whites, and the sanctioning of ``white-only'' jobs.
Black youth in apartheid South Africa were deprived of their youthfulness. They were forced to bear the brunt of poverty, inferior education, lack of adequate recreation facilities and repression from the state.”
[...]
During the last few centuries its main manifestation has been as a system of belief that justified the subjugation and enslavement of the indigenous peoples of the Americas, Asia and Africa by countries of Western Europe starting around 1500.
quote:"In 1953 the government passed the Bantu Education Act, which the people didn't want. We didn't want this bad education for our children. This Bantu Education Act was to make sure that our children only learnt things that would make them good for what the government wanted: to work in the factories and so on; they must not learn properly at school like the white children. Our children were to go to school only three hours a day, two shifts of children every day, one in the morning and one in the afternoon, so that more children could get a little bit of learning without government having to spend more money. Hawu! It was a terrible thing that act."
--Baard and Schreiner, My Spirit is Not Banned, Part 2
quote:Apartheid was a system of government in South Africa, abolished in 1994, which systematically separated groups on the basis of race classification. *The Apartheid system of racial segregation was made law in South Africa in 1948*, when the country was officially divided into four racial groups, White, Black, Indian and Coloureds (or people of mixed race, or non-Whites who did not fit into the other non-White categories). ‘Homelands’ were created for Blacks, and when they lived outside of the homelands with Whites, non-Whites could not vote and had separate schools and hospitals, and even beaches where they could swim or park benches they could sit on.
This is your history there, this is what you are known for doing, this to you is justice and right, this brings joy and happiness to you:
What have we learned today, Doxie. You should not talk about stuff and people, you know very little about.
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
...but yet have no problem with Blacks & other POC like yourself trying to take over Europe (which of course you try to claim the history and ownership of claiming we have no history,homeland,etc).
When and where did this happen? LOL SMH
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol, ...Talk to me when you can go to a city in Any African country and play spot the Negro like you can play spot the cracka in London,Paris,etc.
England and has a history of colonialism, the people who they colonized have a tendency to go over to London. Paris is the same etc.... What is etc? lol
Your education on world history is terrible. Your world view is distorted and disgruntled.
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol, You don't want equality, you want Blacks on top & Whites on the very bottom. BTW, Whites have a right to White supremacy in Europe its our land.
Whites have white supremacy in Europe, correct. Thanks for admitting that one. LOL SMH
Now, let's talk about America, Africa, Asia (Australia)... See how your theory fits there.
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
Lie again, you only care about Blacks & other POC. You hete Whites & view Blacks as superior & Whites as inferior just as Mike,Clyde,Kdolo,MOM,Zarahan,Mena7,Xy-YT-hater do.
You have a problem with a few Whites being in Africa...blah blah blah...
"Nelson Mandela's arrest in 1962 came as a result of a tip-off from an agent of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a report says.
quote: The revelations, made in the Sunday Times newspaper, are based on an interview with ex-CIA agent Donald Rickard shortly before he died.
Mandela served 27 years in jail for resisting white minority rule before being released in 1990.
He was subsequently elected as South Africa's first black president.
Rickard, who died earlier this year, was never formally associated with the CIA but worked as a diplomat in South Africa before retiring in the late 70s.
The interview was conducted by British film director John Irvin, who has made a film, Mandela's Gun, about his brief career as an armed rebel, the Sunday Times said.
Murky events: Karen Allen, BBC Southern Africa Correspondent, Johannesburg
The events leading up the the arrest of Nelson Mandela, on a dark night near Durban in 1962, have always been murky. In the era of Cold War politics, Mandela, then leader of the armed wing of the African National Congress (ANC), was considered a terrorist and a threat to the West.
As Mr Rickard put it, he was "the most dangerous communist" outside of the Soviet Union, although Mandela always denied being a member of the party.
Rumours have circulated for years that the CIA trailed Mandela but the agency resisted previous attempts to shine a light on its alleged involvement in his arrest. Rickard's admission will bring renewed pressure to declassify documents from the time.
The ANC's spokesman Zizi Kodwa said he believed the CIA was still meddling in South African affairs and collaborating with those wanting "regime change". line break
The future president led the armed resistance movement of the banned ANC, and was one of the most wanted men in South Africa at the time of his arrest.
His ability to evade the security services had earned him the nickname "the black Pimpernel".
He was posing as a chauffeur when his car was stopped at a roadblock by the police in the eastern city of Durban in 1962 and he was detained.
"I found out when he was coming down and how he was coming... that's where I was involved and that's where Mandela was caught," Rickard is quoted as saying.
ANC national spokesperson Zizi Kodwa said: "That revelation confirms what we have always known, that they are working against [us], even today.
"It's not thumb sucked, it's not a conspiracy [theory]. It is now confirmed that it did not only start now, there is a pattern in history."
Mandela, president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999, was on a US terror watch list until 2008.
Before that, along with other former ANC leaders, he was only able to visit the US with special permission from the secretary of state, because the ANC had been designated a terrorist organisation by the former apartheid government.
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
You believe that Whites have no right to self knowledge,self determination,self rulership,.
Full circle. Here is a thread providing you sources to the right to"self-knowledge, self-determination, self-rulership".
quote: By ~6,000–5,000 years ago, farmers throughout much of Europe had more hunter-gatherer ancestry than their predecessors, but in Russia, the Yamnaya steppe herders of this time were descended not only from the preceding eastern European hunter-gatherers, but also from a population of Near Eastern ancestry. Western and Eastern Europe came into contact ~4,500 years ago, as the Late Neolithic Corded Ware people from Germany traced ~75% of their ancestry to the Yamnaya, documenting a massive migration into the heartland of Europe from its eastern periphery. This steppe ancestry persisted in all sampled central Europeans until at least ~3,000 years ago, and is ubiquitous in present-day Europeans. These results provide support for a steppe origin9 of at least some of the Indo-European languages of Europe.
--Wolfgang Haak, Iosif Lazaridis, Nick Patterson, Nadin Rohland, Swapan Mallick, Bastien Llamas, Guido Brandt, Susanne Nordenfelt, Eadaoin Harney, Kristin Stewardson, Qiaomei Fu, Alissa Mittnik, Eszter Bánffy, Christos Economou, Michael Francken, Susanne Friederich, Rafael Garrido Pena, Fredrik Hallgren, Valery Khartanovich, Aleksandr Khokhlov, Michael Kunst, Pavel Kuznetsov, Harald Meller, Oleg Mochalov, Vayacheslav Moiseyev et al..
Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe
quote:Originally posted by Ish Gebor: "Nelson Mandela's arrest in 1962 came as a result of a tip-off from an agent of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a report says.
quote: The revelations, made in the Sunday Times newspaper, are based on an interview with ex-CIA agent Donald Rickard shortly before he died.
Mandela served 27 years in jail for resisting white minority rule before being released in 1990.
He was subsequently elected as South Africa's first black president.
Rickard, who died earlier this year, was never formally associated with the CIA but worked as a diplomat in South Africa before retiring in the late 70s.
The interview was conducted by British film director John Irvin, who has made a film, Mandela's Gun, about his brief career as an armed rebel, the Sunday Times said.
Murky events: Karen Allen, BBC Southern Africa Correspondent, Johannesburg
The events leading up the the arrest of Nelson Mandela, on a dark night near Durban in 1962, have always been murky. In the era of Cold War politics, Mandela, then leader of the armed wing of the African National Congress (ANC), was considered a terrorist and a threat to the West.
As Mr Rickard put it, he was "the most dangerous communist" outside of the Soviet Union, although Mandela always denied being a member of the party.
Rumours have circulated for years that the CIA trailed Mandela but the agency resisted previous attempts to shine a light on its alleged involvement in his arrest. Rickard's admission will bring renewed pressure to declassify documents from the time.
The ANC's spokesman Zizi Kodwa said he believed the CIA was still meddling in South African affairs and collaborating with those wanting "regime change". line break
The future president led the armed resistance movement of the banned ANC, and was one of the most wanted men in South Africa at the time of his arrest.
His ability to evade the security services had earned him the nickname "the black Pimpernel".
He was posing as a chauffeur when his car was stopped at a roadblock by the police in the eastern city of Durban in 1962 and he was detained.
"I found out when he was coming down and how he was coming... that's where I was involved and that's where Mandela was caught," Rickard is quoted as saying.
ANC national spokesperson Zizi Kodwa said: "That revelation confirms what we have always known, that they are working against [us], even today.
"It's not thumb sucked, it's not a conspiracy [theory]. It is now confirmed that it did not only start now, there is a pattern in history."
Mandela, president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999, was on a US terror watch list until 2008.
Before that, along with other former ANC leaders, he was only able to visit the US with special permission from the secretary of state, because the ANC had been designated a terrorist organisation by the former apartheid government.
But people try to make J Edgar out to be the main evil guy. In fact, it was the Kennedys that ordered around the clock surveillance on King, and gave Hoover scope to harass the civil rights leader. JFK was embarrassed internationally about his image during the Cold War because civil rights disruptions and marches made him look bad- a fraud or hypocrite - a charge oft leveled by the Soviet Union and by some black activists. Credible biographers like David Garrow show it was the unglamorous Lyndon Johnson, not the glamor boy Kennedys, that really got the ball moving on civil rights as a national priority. Johnson refused to drag his feet like the Kennedys and pushed through the legislative side of the Civil Rights reforms. Johnson was no saint, and was a sometimes corrupt wheeler-dealer, and his mistakes and illusions about Vietnam are well documented, but he did a hell of a lot more for civil rights that the Kennedys.
" J. Edgar leads us to believe that all of this voyeurism came at the instigation of Hoover. But the date of October 10, 1963, offers a different narrative: that was when Attorney General Robert Kennedy, angered by King's recalcitrance to comply with the president's demand to oust Levison, ordered Hoover to have bureau agents wiretap King's telephones, including the one in the preacher's Atlanta home.
"I asked the FBI to make an intensive investigation of Martin Luther King," Robert Kennedy later privately acknowledged to journalist Anthony Lewis, "to see who his companions were and, also, to see what other activities he was involved in. This is also the reason that President Kennedy and I and the Department of Justice were so reserved about him, which I'm sure he felt. We never wanted to get close to him just because of these contacts and connections that he had, which we felt were damaging to the civil rights movement and because we were so intimately involved in the struggle for civil rights, it also damaged us. It damaged what we were trying to do." Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
@ Zarahan, ^Those demons invested a lot of time and effort in that wickedness.
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Everything I said was true. Whites are not allowed to own businesses in SA, if they want to then they have to give 51% of it to a Black. This was told to me by someone who lives there. Yes White children in SA are denied an education. Black children in SA don't have to pay to go to school,where as White children do,so if their White parents can't afford to pay then the children don't go. Yeah yeah Troll Patrol keep blaming Whitey for your violent tendencies, fact is these White men,women,elders,children,infants weren't targeted randomly,they are targeted because they are White. Feast your eyes on your peoples handiwork http://ajkraad.wix.com/genocide-museum#!. Sorry but your effort to instill White guilt in me doesn't work, I feel no guilt sorry special snowflake.
Whites don't have living space because of you invading & trying to take over our land. Name me one,just one country in Europe or elsewhere that is 100% White troll Patrol. What kind of future is being taught that by vitue of being born White you are a bad,wicked,evil,racist who's mere life oppresses POC.
We have the right to have supremacy in Europe, its our land. Ohhh wait that's right you don't believe Whites are indigenous to anywhere on earth ie have no homeland. Just as you believe Whites are inferior & have no history. Sorry Troll Patrol I believe nothing an Anti-White spouts without proof. Where's the dang proof, where's the skeletons,where's the depictions,there's no dang proof. Therefore you are not trying to give Whites knowledge of self with your Anti-White "sources" & of course I see you couldn't resist putting in an attack on Whites in there. Yes we would still be humans if we mixed but Whitey would be gone no more White people, Whitey extinct & that's What you want. My proposition is separation.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
Whitey hater, cut the crap. That ugly,landlocked,waterless, barren waste land where nothing can be grown & no animals can be raised known as C. Asia is NOT our home, Europe is.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Kdolo,
Whitey hater, cut the crap. That ugly,landlocked,waterless, barren waste land where nothing can be grown & no animals can be raised known as C. Asia is NOT our home, Europe is.
He was talking about your "Natural" home Doxie. You know, the place where you and your people "Belong".
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Taking back stolen land and resources from whites in Africa who used all sorts of human rights abuses and crimes against humanity to get those resources is not "oppressing" white people. It is funny how white folks are the first ones to stand up and demand justice and a return of stolen land and property when they are injured. However, when other people are victims, especially blacks, as a result of white theft and oppression, they claim that giving back what was stolen "isn't fair". In other words, white supremacy 101: the only "free and fair" system is where whites own and control everything.
Posts: 8896 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
Everything I said was true. Whites are not allowed to own businesses in SA, if they want to then they have to give 51% of it to a Black. This was told to me by someone who lives there.
LOL Are you dumb. Whites still rule portions the economy in South Africa, despite of reformations, and yes it's slow transactions. And yes you do have deprived whites now, since not everything is handed out to them, like it was during the Apartheid.
Why would I want to believe anything a your white racist friends over there have to say. How long your "friend" lives there? lol
quote: Everyone here, regardless of colour, tells you that white people are still riding high.
They run the economy. They have a disproportionate amount of influence in politics and the media. They still have the best houses and most of the best jobs.
"It is having its effect on whites today, even though they still own a share of South Africa's wealth which is entirely disproportionate," he said...
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
Yes White children in SA are denied an education. Black children in SA don't have to pay to go to school,where as White children do,so if their White parents can't afford to pay then the children don't go.
I am not so sure about that. But if so. it likely deals with affirmative action. Since blacks received backwards education for so long. While they've been put in Township for decades. Which created a stimulus of poverty. In the meanwhile whites had it all wonderful. Now some whites can't hang and you cry. You always wanted private schools over there, separate from blacks, right?
Six things white people have that black people don’t 23 Feb 2015
quote: There’s a reason we can’t just “move on” and get over apartheid. Its effects are still very real for black South Africans, writes Verashni Pillay.
Generational wealth
Here’s how this works: most white South Africans’ parents or grandparents were able to buy and own property and businesses or shares in business. They were able to pay off their properties or expand their businesses thanks to preferential treatment and employment.
They were then able to leave the proceeds of this wealth to their children, our contemporaries, as either an inheritance or a financial jump-start in life.
Most black South Africans have no such jump-start. They stand and fall on their own efforts alone and there is very little safety net if they don’t make it. Family wealth is already thinly spread to cover those who have nothing.
When my black friends say they’re broke, it means family debt, circling loan sharks and the horror of truly going under. When my white friends say they’re broke it usually means they may have to dip into their savings or swallow their pride and ask their parents for help.
I won’t be getting any inheritance, a policy that pays out a nice lump sum at some point in my life or a paid-off flat with little or no rent. These are the reserve of those who have had generations to build this kind of wealth and pass it on.
Compared with most other countries, education gets a very large slice of the public pie – around 20% of total state expenditure. It receives the largest share of government spending.
More money is always needed to address the huge backlogs left by 40 years of apartheid education. Under that system, white South African children received a quality schooling virtually for free, while their black counterparts had only "Bantu education", a keystone of the overall apartheid system.
Although today's government is working to rectify the imbalances in education, the apartheid legacy remains. Illiteracy rates currently stand at around 18% of adults over 15 years old (about 9-million adults are not functionally literate), teachers in township schools are poorly trained.
Despite the challenges, much has been achieved since apartheid legislation was scrapped. For example, in 1993 nearly half of all students in higher education institutions were white, but since 1994, black African enrolments have nearly doubled, growing by 91% (or 4.4% a year) and overall enrolments have grown by 41% (or 2.3% a year).
However, South Africa's student participation rate – that is, the proportion of 18- to 24-year olds in higher education – is a low 16%.
Equity has yet to be achieved: almost 58.5% of whites and around 51% of Indians enter higher education. The rate for coloureds is 14.3%, while blacks are even lower at 12%. The reason for this is generally understood as poor quality primary and secondary schooling, which is a priority for the current government.
The greatest challenges for schooling lie in the poorer, rural provinces such as the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal. Schools are generally better resourced in the more affluent provinces such as Gauteng and the Western Cape.
You pull your **** from nazi propaganda websites, no wonder you come up with all these weird claims.
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
^ here we have some people black and white, their homeland is Tanzania
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by kdolo: Doxie.
Central Asia has plenty of space.
you all can go back home any time you like.
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Kdolo,
Whitey hater, cut the crap. That ugly,landlocked,waterless, barren waste land where nothing can be grown & no animals can be raised known as C. Asia is NOT our home, Europe is.
He was talking about your "Natural" home Doxie. You know, the place where you and your people "Belong".
realhistory says the homeland of white people, Dravidian albinos is India. Central Asia was only place they migrated to. But according to Dr. Winters the Dravidians are Kushites. In other words the homeland of black and white Caucasoid is Sudan.
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
Yeah yeah Troll Patrol keep blaming Whitey for your violent tendencies,
Blame? LOL
Those are historical FACTS! It has little to do with blame. I know it harsh to be confronted with truth.
Soweto Massacre
Today our nation commemorates the 38th anniversary of the student's uprising of June 16, 1976. The student-led protests in Soweto - known as the Soweto Uprising - claimed about 23 lives in Soweto alone on the day of the march. The protests began in Soweto schools and spread across the country. The unrest was a response to the introduction of Afrikaans as the medium of instruction. The SABC spoke to some of the students of the class of 1976 who were at the forefront of the students' march
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol, fact is these White men,women,elders,children,infants weren't targeted randomly,they are targeted because they are White.
These are facts in your delusional mind. Crime is high over all in South Africa. It's not lie only whites die because of crime, as you try to imply.
Here is the deal, and here are the facts!
quote: Are SA whites really being killed “like flies”? Why Steve Hofmeyr is wrong
South African musician Steve Hofmeyr has claimed that the number of white South Africans killed by blacks would fill a soccer stadium, that white Afrikaners are being killed “like flies” and that a white farmer is murdered every five days. But the claims are incorrect and grossly exaggerated. In fact, whites are less likely to be murdered than any other race group.
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
Feast your eyes on your peoples handiwork http://ajkraad.wix.com/genocide-museum#!. Sorry but your effort to instill White guilt in me doesn't work, I feel no guilt sorry special snowflake.
I have no idea what you are trying to show here with a self made WIX page. But crime rate in South Africa is high overall. That page is subjective, since it only focuses on one particular group of people. While this affects all south Africans.
I know you don't have white guilt, over the hundreds and thousands of innocents, who have been killed by whites / boers over there throughout the many decades. lol Why don't you tell us something we don't know.
As explained before, poverty is rampant over there, and was created by whites. Yes, boers. In other words, your new is very one sided.
Do I condone the killing of whites, nope. Do I understand it, yes. Do I condone the killing of non-white, nope. Do I understand it, yes.
quote: It is a decade since the exposure of Project Coast, apartheid South Africa's covert chemical and biological warfare program. In that time, attention has been focused on several aspects of the program, particularly the production of narcotics and poisons for use against anti-apartheid activists and the proliferation of both chemical and biological weapons. The eugenic dimension of Project Coast has, by contrast, received scant attention. It is time to revisit the testimony that brought the suggestion of eugenic motives to light, reflect on some of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's findings and search for lessons that can be taken from this troubled chapter in South Africa's history.
--Singh JA Endeavour. 2008 Mar;32(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2008.01.005. Project Coast: eugenics in apartheid South Africa.
quote: South Africa became a democratic state with a supreme Constitution and Bill of Rights in 1994. Between 1994 and 1996 South Africans drafted a new constitution which came into force in 1997. While, the right to health, as well as socio-economic rights is provided for, the health care system in post-apartheid South Africa still mirrors that which existed during the apartheid years. There are still two health care systems. The poorly funded public sector services the majority, while the well-funded private sector services the privileged few. A lack of resources is blamed by the state for its inability to provide better and more widespread health services. This article examines, from a human rights perspective, the successes and challenges in developing the right to health between 1994 to 1999, and provides an overview of the present state of health in South Africa. This article further examines the constitutional provisions on health, and discusses recent constitutional court decisions relevant to the right to health. New and controversial health laws and regulations, affecting health care professionals, medical aid schemes and the availability of pharmaceuticals, are critiqued. The move to devolving health care to the provinces is described. Also discussed are the controversial steps taken by the Department of Health to restructure health structures and services. Progress on key health issues such as HIV/Aids, tobacco, tuberculosis, polio, measles, hepatitis, malaria and abortion are also described. Attention is focused on the role of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's health hearings in bringing to light violations of human rights in health during apartheid as well as the recommendations made to address these problems.
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: What kind of future is being taught that by vitue of being born White you are a bad,wicked,evil,racist who's mere life oppresses POC.
Your knowledge of self, I guess.
A Brief History of Educational Inequality from Apartheid to the Present
quote:"Challenging the past and moving beyond the legacy of apartheid" is how the South African Department of Education plans to work towards social justice and equity with the introduction of the new curriculum titled "Curriculum 2005" (Asmal). Eliminating the overt racism in educational policies is the first step in challenging the past, but other factors of social inequalities need to be addressed to minimize the racial inequalities in education for the future.
The Apartheid system created educational inequalities through overt racist policies (see timeline). The Bantu Education Act of 1952 ensured that Blacks receive an education that would limit educational potential and remain in the working class (UCT). This policy directly affected the content of learning to further racial inequalities by preventing access to further education. In addition to content, apartheid legislation affected the educational potential of students. School was compulsory for Whites from age seven to sixteen, for Asians and Coloureds from seven to fifteen, and for Blacks from age seven to thirteen (US Library of Congress). Clearly, the less education students received, the fewer choices they had in the working world and in accessing more education. Since these policies ensured that the content and amount of education perpetuated social inequalities, changing these policies in a post-apartheid era was the logical step towards social equality.
Educational inequality was also evident in funding. The Bantu Education Act created separate Departments of Education by race, and it gave less money to Black schools while giving most to Whites (UCT). Since funding determines the amount and quality of learning materials, facilities, and teachers, disproportionate funding clearly created disparities in learning environments. For instance, Apartheid funding resulted in an average teacher pupil ratio of 1:18 in white schools, 1:24 in Asian schools, 1:27 in Coloured schools, and 1:39 in Black schools (US Library of Congress). Furthermore, the apartheid system also affected the quality of teachers. White schools had 96% of teachers with teaching certificates, while only 15% of teachers in Black schools were certified (Garson). In addition to affecting the quality of education, the Bantu Education Act also resulted in the closure of many learning institutions since it withdrew funding from schools affiliated with religion. Since many church schools provided education for a large number of Blacks, the Black students were the ones most profoundly impacted by the withdrawal of these funds (US Library of Congress). Although the government explained its actions under the premise of separation of church and state, eliminating schools that serve Blacks is an ultimate form of educational injustice.
The policies and funding disparities in schools ensured contrasting access to higher education. Four Afrikaans speaking universities and one English speaking university admitted only Whites, while the other five had restricted admission and segregated classrooms (US Library of Congress). Additionally, there was no financial aid, and banks did not give out loans to Blacks or Coloureds (Knipe-Solomon). This means that even if students could break through working class instruction with under-qualified teachers in overcrowded classrooms, they still faced financial barriers to achieving their academic goals.
Europe has different countries, with each its own autonomy, some countries have a colonial past, so people tend to go there. It has to do with share of commonwealth, you dumbo.
quote: Name me one,just one country in Europe or elsewhere that is 100% White troll Patrol.
I have no idea, I have not visited all European countries. And even if I did, I wouldn't be able to visit all locations or meet each and every single individual. But, again. It was european countries who moved to other continents. So I don't understand you fuss.
But I understand your game and where you're heading at. See, if all whites have to return to Europe. Europe will get overcrowded . All whites from America and Australia and some Latin American countries is 10 to the power of non-western immigrants in Europe. lol
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Troll Patrol,
We have the right to have supremacy in Europe, its our land.
You already wrote this. And it was already responded to.
Question is, what are you still doing in America?
Amerindians have the right to have supremacy in America, its their land.
Even more ironic is that europeans went to every other continent to make the rules based on white supremacy, hence imperialism (capitalist patriarchy). See, nothing you say makes sense. And it never does.
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: Black boys and white boys of Tanzania
^ here we have some people black and white, their homeland is Tanzania
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by kdolo: Doxie.
Central Asia has plenty of space.
you all can go back home any time you like.
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: Kdolo,
Whitey hater, cut the crap. That ugly,landlocked,waterless, barren waste land where nothing can be grown & no animals can be raised known as C. Asia is NOT our home, Europe is.
He was talking about your "Natural" home Doxie. You know, the place where you and your people "Belong".
realhistory says the homeland of white people, Dravidian albinos is India. Central Asia was only place they migrated to. But according to Dr. Winters the Dravidians are Kushites. In other words the homeland of black and white Caucasoid is Sudan.
quote:
Southeast and south Asian populations are also often thought to be derived from the admixture of various combinations of western Eurasians (‘Caucasoids’), east Asians and Australasians. ...
These findings, coupled with the recently discovered presence of haplogroup U in Ethiopia [11], support a scenario in which a northeast African population dispersed out of Africa into India, presumably through the Arabian peninsula, before 50,000 years ago (Figure 2). Other migrations into India also occurred, but rarely from western Eurasian populations. ...
Thus, the ‘caucasoid’ features of south Asians may best be considered ‘pre-caucasoid’— that is, part of a diverse north or north-east African gene pool that yielded separate origins for western Eurasian and southern Asian populations over 50,000 years ago.
--Todd R. Disotell.
Human evolution: The southern route to Asia
Volume 9, Issue 24, 30 December 1999, Pages R925–R928
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Still remnants from the Apartheid. Horrific white supremacy influences.
quote:The Economics of South African Townships
PRETORIA, August 21, 2014 – Most countries are made up of two distinct geographic areas, one rural, one urban. But South Africa’s landscape also includes townships and informal settlements (T&IS) which makes for large, underdeveloped communities with working-age people desperate for economic opportunity, being spatially disconnected from urban centers that offer better economic prospects.
The report on the “Economics of South African Townships: Special Focus on Diepsloot” explores this unique South African challenge. It finds that about half of South Africa’s urban population lives in T&IS, accounting for 38% of working-age citizens, but home to nearly 60% of its unemployed. With a special focus on Diepsloot, a large township near Johannesburg, the study offers an understanding of the structure of a township economy and identifies the economic realities and choices of those who live there.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic