The Eastern Libyans have nothing I mean nothing to do with the Maghreb proper (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia). They were no far west than Cyrenaica in eastern Libya per AE records.
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
As I said before there was a long stretch over 1000 years of no eveidence of human habiation in the Maghreb. They might find some in the future. Long haired Nomadic tribes are mentioned by the Greeks but Sea people and other foreigners had been entering the region hundreds of years before Herodotus.
Sea Peoples in the Maghreb????????????????????? Get tha fuh outta here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
[an]Other ignorant statement[] * Carthage is not distinct from Phoenicia
if you mean Carthage had no relation to Phoenica you are misleading the people
Of course Carthage is distinct from Phoenicia.
Carthage is NE Tunisia in Africa Minor at the south central Mediterranean.
Phoenicia is Canaan in the Levant at far east Mediterranean.
Carthage was founded by Phoenicians (Canaanites -- K*na`ani per their own nomenclature). Over time Carthage's colonists fused with the native Imazighen to birth the unique Punic civilization.
The Punics became independent of Canaan even conquering other subservient Canaanite colonies.
Carthaginians were less Phoenician than Canadians, Americans, South Africans, or Australians are English.
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
Other ignorant statements
* Angus McBrides total fantasy Tichitt Phoenicia trade
please follow the thead, Son of Ra introduced that picture, it's his fault, my post remark was
"The illustration portays Phoenicians traders trading with Mandé merchants of the Pre-Imperial Mali in the 10th c I'm not sure that happened, would need to see another source verifying it."
Where were you when he first posted that?
please explain about the total fantasy, I don't know much about it. I suppose there are timeline issue ?
My bad. You questioned the illo. Good for you! The architecture, the clothing, the date for either Phoenicians or the "Dhari," but more than anything the idea the sea going Phoenicians went all the way some 700 kilos inland to do personal trade.
If anything trade was going on between the "Dhari" and the Garamante but that was like around -300, long after Phoenicia had exited the stage.
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Gafsian is more correct than Capsian. The type site is at Gafsa not Capsa.
It's a matter of self-determinative agency in applying terminology more appropriate to Africa than to Euros.
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: Carthage was founded by Phoenicians (Canaanites -- K*na`ani per their own nomenclature). Over time Carthage's colonists fused with the native Imazighen to birth the unique Punic civilization.\
Do we actually know whether the people living in the Carthage area before the Phoenicians were actually Berbers? How do we know they weren't, say, related to Mandinkas or some other Niger-Congo West African people?
Posts: 7069 | From: Fallbrook, CA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Son of Ra: @Truthcentric
You believe Hannibal was African?
Don't think there's hard evidence either way, but I do have another recent drawing of him that portrays him as more African:
And an earlier, more dynamic picture of him brandishing his battle ax:
"I shall use fire and steel to arrest the destiny of Rome!"
Agreed...We really dont know if Hannibal was African or non African since there's no portraits of him, physical remains or recorded depictions of him...
Posts: 1135 | From: Top secret | Registered: Jun 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: So where's your primary documental evidence from the Latin Roman authors that his moms was Italian not just a Roman citizen?
Use a little logic. If he was raised by a 'Tally mommi he would not have a nearly unintelligible accent that Romans made fun of when he spoke Latin would he?
Don't just nitpick everything I say without puting forward something for the people to grasp as an alternative. I haven't read the primary sources on this accent thing. There is an element of logic to what you are saying but you have said nothing about if his moms also had an accent, what she had an accent and what type of accent she had.
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: Gafsian is more correct than Capsian. The type site is at Gafsa not Capsa.
It's a matter of self-determinative agency in applying terminology more appropriate to Africa than to Euros.
Authors of modern books on North Africa, professional anthropologists working today, as far as I know are not using this term. So therefore when people who come to Egyptsearch to learn stuff and hear you use all these obscure terms you think are more proper dont know what you are talking about and might lose interest
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: Build a straw man knock it down. Absolutely nothing I ever said or anything to do with anything I ever said.
Now if I call you a disengenious photo spammin' twit don't run to Sammy again and have him wipe what you don't like the way you did last month behind me puttin' fire up under yr ass in the Who These People and the Kefti threads. Ya hear? [/QB]
^^^ egocentic theory
I complained to ausar in a pm about the deletion, he didn't know who did it
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
Another point you tried to slink away from is a - vacant post-Gafsian Maghreb b - inhabited post-Gafsian Maghreb which one? You know it can't be both.
^^^"All or nothing" mentality
Yes, outlining your all or nothing submentality
Direct quote
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
After North African Capsian culture there is 1-2000 year gap of no evidence of human habitation settlements in the Maghreb Possibly there were some nomads around. The Capsians were the last hunter gatherer culture about 10,000 to 6,000 BCE.
Fact is, you know bupkis about the Gafsian.
Compare what you wrote yesterday to what you wrote in July
Proof positive you don't know what you talkin bout just frontin frauds as you go along with newbies getting sucked in by your one day this next day that bullshit.
as I said ther are various sources with differnt dates. Instead of soley nit picking put forward a date. You don't want't to because my point stiil stands.
If you look at 8000 bc – 2,700 BC. it fits within 10,000 to 6,000 BCE.
Different sources define these cultures differently and there are dating issues.
give dates for the people
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
[an]Other ignorant statement[] * Carthage is not distinct from Phoenicia
if you mean Carthage had no relation to Phoenica you are misleading the people
Of course Carthage is distinct from Phoenicia....
Carthage was founded by Phoenicians
"distinct" could mean anything, semantics. America is distinct from Britain Alaska is distinct from Peru France is distiinct from Belgium
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
over time Carthage's colonists fused with the native Imazighen to birth the unique Punic civilization.
Carthaginians were less Phoenician than Canadians, Americans, South Africans, or Australians are English.
How do you know that, Carthaginians were less Phoenician than Canadians, Americans, South Africans, or Australians are English?
Even people who argue a healthy indigenous African input would not go that far.
The Sahara: A Cultural History By Eamonn Gearon
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri
^^^ you posted this. Are you convinced these people were fully indigenous deep rooted Africans? I suppose it's possible but it seems to be hard to know for sure
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Um...Yeah you can clearly see the paint has faded off.
@Truthcentric
Some people say that can be a Nubian. Also you said maybe the Carthaginians could have been related to Niger Congo people. Well the people of Tichitt Walata were Sonnike people who are infact Niger Congo type people and those same people traded with the Carthaginians as seen in the OP.
Also does any have even more sources about trade between Carthaginians and West Africans or just their relations?
Posts: 1135 | From: Top secret | Registered: Jun 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric: We do have this coin from Italy dating to 208-207 BC, which is within Hannibal's lifetime. Could it show a contemporary's portrait of him?
why of the Carthegian coins that have people and elephants on them would that one in particular be Hannibal?
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol aka Ish Gebor:
quote:Originally posted by Son of Ra:
^^^Interesting.
quote: The sandstone escarpment of the Dhar Tichitt in South-Central Mauritania was inhabited by Neolithic agropastoral communities for approximately one and half millennium during the Late Holocene, from ca. 4000 to 2300 BP. The absence of prior evidence of human settlement points to the influx of mobile herders moving away from the “drying” Sahara towards more humid lower latitudes.
quote: Legend holds that Carthage was founded around 825 BC by Queen Dido who had fled from the city of Tyre to escape her murderous brother Pygmalion. Archaeological evidence confirms that Phoenician traders from Tyre founded the city of Qart-Ḥadašt—or "New City," as Carthage was known in its native language—in the second half of the ninth century BC.
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric: reliable information on ancient Carthaginian architecture proved surprisingly hard to come by, especially since the Romans utterly destroyed the original city before rebuilding it in their own style.
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
So how do we know they weren't Italian? Anything goes in make believe or what if.
GOOGLE the etymology of Africa thread or read Dana's article in Golden Age o/t Moor.
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric:
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: Carthage was founded by Phoenicians (Canaanites -- K*na`ani per their own nomenclature). Over time Carthage's colonists fused with the native Imazighen to birth the unique Punic civilization.\
Do we actually know whether the people living in the Carthage area before the Phoenicians were actually Berbers? How do we know they weren't, say, related to Mandinkas or some other Niger-Congo West African people?
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Guess we should know when moms took a **** too eh
You got no proof sh was 'Tally and if 'Tally naturally a 'Tally accent, duh.
I think most people of African descent appreciate the alternate African names instead of what colonialist used. if not then 2 2 bad.
No hiatus from Maghreb after Gafsian there was both Med Neolithic and Gafsian Neolithic tradition but u no know bout that thus ignorant assertion not to mention u gave widely diff Gafsian end dates this month vs july. now that's a gaffe
Of course the temehu were deep rooted African with shallow nonAfrican aDNA like I've been sayin' all these years.
U r so vapid
Just a waste of time w/u. I've done enough u do t/rest. But this time do yr homework before opening yr flytrap
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: So where's your primary documental evidence from the Latin Roman authors that his moms was Italian not just a Roman citizen?
Use a little logic. If he was raised by a 'Tally mommi he would not have a nearly unintelligible accent that Romans made fun of when he spoke Latin would he?
Don't just nitpick everything I say without puting forward something for the people to grasp as an alternative. I haven't read the primary sources on this accent thing. There is an element of logic to what you are saying but you have said nothing about if his moms also had an accent, what she had an accent and what type of accent she had.
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: Gafsian is more correct than Capsian. The type site is at Gafsa not Capsa.
It's a matter of self-determinative agency in applying terminology more appropriate to Africa than to Euros.
Authors of modern books on North Africa, professional anthropologists working today, as far as I know are not using this term. So therefore when people who come to Egyptsearch to learn stuff and hear you use all these obscure terms you think are more proper dont know what you are talking about and might lose interest
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: Build a straw man knock it down. Absolutely nothing I ever said or anything to do with anything I ever said.
Now if I call you a disengenious photo spammin' twit don't run to Sammy again and have him wipe what you don't like the way you did last month behind me puttin' fire up under yr ass in the Who These People and the Kefti threads. Ya hear?
^^^ egocentic theory
I complained to ausar in a pm about the deletion, he didn't know who did it
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
Another point you tried to slink away from is a - vacant post-Gafsian Maghreb b - inhabited post-Gafsian Maghreb which one? You know it can't be both.
^^^"All or nothing" mentality
Yes, outlining your all or nothing submentality
Direct quote
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
After North African Capsian culture there is 1-2000 year gap of no evidence of human habitation settlements in the Maghreb Possibly there were some nomads around. The Capsians were the last hunter gatherer culture about 10,000 to 6,000 BCE.
Fact is, you know bupkis about the Gafsian.
Compare what you wrote yesterday to what you wrote in July
Proof positive you don't know what you talkin bout just frontin frauds as you go along with newbies getting sucked in by your one day this next day that bullshit.
as I said ther are various sources with differnt dates. Instead of soley nit picking put forward a date. You don't want't to because my point stiil stands.
If you look at 8000 bc – 2,700 BC. it fits within 10,000 to 6,000 BCE.
Different sources define these cultures differently and there are dating issues.
give dates for the people
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
[an]Other ignorant statement[] * Carthage is not distinct from Phoenicia
if you mean Carthage had no relation to Phoenica you are misleading the people
Of course Carthage is distinct from Phoenicia....
Carthage was founded by Phoenicians
"distinct" could mean anything, semantics. America is distinct from Britain Alaska is distinct from Peru France is distiinct from Belgium
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler:
over time Carthage's colonists fused with the native Imazighen to birth the unique Punic civilization.
Carthaginians were less Phoenician than Canadians, Americans, South Africans, or Australians are English.
How do you know that, Carthaginians were less Phoenician than Canadians, Americans, South Africans, or Australians are English?
Even people who argue a healthy indigenous African input would not go that far.
The Sahara: A Cultural History By Eamonn Gearon
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri
^^^ you posted this. Are you convinced these people were fully indigenous deep rooted Africans? I suppose it's possible but it seems to be hard to know for sure [/QB]
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Pure speculation that a small value nonCarthaginian coin is Hannibal but valuable Carthaginian currency o/t time doesn't depict Hannibal.
And that thing about why a mahout obverse the elephant? Why a Indian obverse the buffalo on old USA nickels?
Plenty of old black Hannibal threads this has been beat to death go GOOGLE don't wanna keep goin in circles want sumpin new
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric: We do have this coin from Italy dating to 208-207 BC, which is within Hannibal's lifetime. Could it show a contemporary's portrait of him?
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
C'mon this faded paint complexion but nowhere else is weak weak weak. Everbody quit actin' like there were no lite brite folk in NA of course there were
Whoever says they're Nubian can't read hieroglyphics and hasn't seen the whole scene
its good to revisit themes but damn aint nuthin wrong with GOOGLing the archive once in a while
ES been here since 2004 no interest in what was said before
no continuity from generation to generation, a big problem and why the youth are not grounded
always starting from square 1 instead of building on what was handed down
Give it 2 d y man he builds up from generation to generation
quote:Originally posted by Son of Ra: Um...Yeah you can clearly see the paint has faded off.
@Truthcentric
Some people say that can be a Nubian. Also you said maybe the Carthaginians could have been related to Niger Congo people. Well the people of Tichitt Walata were Sonnike people who are infact Niger Congo type people and those same people traded with the Carthaginians as seen in the OP.
Also does any have even more sources about trade between Carthaginians and West Africans or just their relations?
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
AGAIN
That coin ain't Carthaginian look it up on earlier Hannibal ES threads or a numismatic site
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric: We do have this coin from Italy dating to 208-207 BC, which is within Hannibal's lifetime. Could it show a contemporary's portrait of him?
why of the Carthegian coins that have people and elephants on them would that one in particular be Hannibal?
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
What??? It seems you can't read or grasp the argument at hand.
1. I said the coins could be of a Nubian people, because Nubians were known for supplying Carthage with their elephants, so I heard. And I also heard those coins could be of a Nubian person. Had nothing to do with hieroglyphics. Truthcentric was the one that brought up the coins. 2. I said the paint was faded...Well because it is and you can clearly see some of the darker colors on it. Not only that, I said it because some people would use that painting as proof of pale Skin Caucasoid roaming Africa, which is not rare because Eurocentrics always love to post faded paintings as representatives of pale skin people being in Africa. Most paintings I've seen on the Libyans, they were brown skinned no different from the Ancient Egyptians.
Posts: 1135 | From: Top secret | Registered: Jun 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: Carthage was founded by Phoenicians (Canaanites -- K*na`ani per their own nomenclature). Over time Carthage's colonists fused with the native Imazighen to birth the unique Punic civilization.\
Do we actually know whether the people living in the Carthage area before the Phoenicians were actually Berbers? How do we know they weren't, say, related to Mandinkas or some other Niger-Congo West African people?
WHAT BONES CAN TELL: BIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE HUNTER-GATHERERS OF THE MAGHREB:
quote: The extremely large skeletal samples that come from sites such as Taforalt (Fig. 8.13) and Afalou constitute an invaluable resource for understanding the makers of Iberomaurusian artifacts, and their number is unparalleled elsewhere in Africa for the early Holocene. Frequently termed Mechta-Afalou or Mechtoid, these were a skeletally robust people and definitely African in origin, though attempts, such as those of Ferembach (1985), to establish similarities with much older and rarer Aterian skeletal remains are tenuous given the immense temporal separation between the two (Close and Wendorf 1990). At the opposite end of the chronological spectrum, dental morphology does suggest connections with later Africans, including those responsible for the Capsian Industry (Irish 2000) and early mid-Holocene human remains from the western half of the Sahara (Dutour 1989), something that points to the Maghreb as one of the regions from which people recolonised the desert (MacDonald 1998).
Turning to what can be learned about cultural practices and disease, the individuals from Taforalt, the largest sample by far, display little evidence of trauma, though they do suggest a high incidence of infant mortality, with evidence for dental caries, arthritis, and rheumatism among other degenerative conditions. Interestingly, Taforalt also provides one of the oldest known instances of the practice of trepanation, the surgical removal of a portion of the cranium; the patient evidently survived for some time, as there are signs of bone regrowth in the affected area. Another form of body modification was much more widespread and, indeed, a distinctive feature of the Iberomaurusian skeletal sample as a whole. This was the practice of removing two or more of the upper incisors, usually around puberty and from both males and females, something that probably served as both a rite of passage and an ethnic marker (Close and Wendorf 1990), just as it does in parts of sub-Saharan Africa today (e.g., van Reenen 1987). Cranial and postcranial malformations are also apparent and may indicate pronounced endogamy at a much more localised level (Hadjouis 2002), perhaps supported by the degree of variability between different site samples noted by Irish (2000).
--Lawrence Barham The First Africans: African Archaeology from the Earliest Toolmakers to Most Recent Foragers (Cambridge World Archaeology)
quote: Craniometric data from seven human groups (Tables 3, 4) were subjected to principal components analysis, which allies the early Holocene population at Gobero (Gob-e) with mid-Holocene “Mechtoids” from Mali and Mauritania [18], [26], [27] and with Late Pleistocene Iberomaurusians and early Holocene Capsians from across the Maghreb
Figure 6. Principal components analysis of craniofacial dimensions among Late Pleistocene to mid-Holocene populations from the Maghreb and southern Sahara.
Table 3. Nine human populations sampled for craniometric analysis ranging in age from the Late Pleistocene (ca. 80,000 BP, Aterian) to the mid-Holocene (ca. 4000 BP) and in geographic distribution across the Maghreb to the southern Sahara [18], [19], [26], [27], [54]. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002995.t003
quote:The older occupants have craniofacial dimensions that demonstrate similarities with mid-Holocene occupants of the southern Sahara and Late Pleistocene to early Holocene inhabitants of the Maghreb.
quote:These early occupants abandon the area under arid conditions and, when humid conditions return ~4600 B.C.E., are replaced by a more gracile people with elaborated grave goods including animal bone and ivory ornaments.
quote: Principal components analysis of craniometric variables closely allies the early Holocene occupants at Gobero with a skeletally robust, trans-Saharan assemblage of Late Pleistocene to mid-Holocene human populations from the Maghreb and southern Sahara.
quote:Figure 6. Principal components analysis of craniofacial dimensions among Late Pleistocene to mid-Holocene populations from the Maghreb and southern Sahara.
Plot of first two principal components extracted from a mean matrix for 17 craniometric variables (Tables 4, 7) in 9 human populations (Table 3) from the Late Pleistocene through the mid-Holocene from the Maghreb and southern Sahara. Seven trans-Saharan populations cluster together, whereas Late Pleistocene Aterians (Ater) and the mid-Holocene population at Gobero (Gob-m) are striking outliers. Axes are scaled by the square root of the corresponding eigenvalue for the principal component. Abbreviations: Ater, Aterian; EMC, eastern Maghreb Capsian; EMI, eastern Maghreb Iberomaurusian; Gob-e, Gobero early Holocene; Gob-m, Gobero mid-Holocene; Mali, Hassi-el-Abiod, Mali; Maur, Mauritania; WMC, western Maghreb Capsian; WMI, western Maghreb Iberomaurusian.
--(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002995.g006)
quote:Craniometric data from seven human groups (Tables 3, 4) were subjected to principal components analysis, which allies the early Holocene population at Gobero (Gob-e) with mid-Holocene “Mechtoids” from Mali and Mauritania [18], [26], [27] and with Late Pleistocene Iberomaurusians and early Holocene Capsians from across the Maghreb (see cluster in Figure 6). The striking similarity between these seven human populations confirms previous suggestions regarding their affinity [18] and is particularly significant given their temporal range (Late Pleistocene to mid-Holocene) and trans-Saharan geographic distribution (across the Maghreb to the southern Sahara).
quote: Trans-Saharan craniometry. Principal components analysis of craniometric variables closely allies the early Holocene occupants at Gobero, who were buried with Kiffian material culture, with Late Pleistocene to mid-Holocene humans from the Maghreb and southern Sahara referred to as Iberomaurusians, Capsians and “Mechtoids.” Outliers to this cluster of populations include an older Aterian sample and the mid-Holocene occupants at Gobero associated with Tenerean material culture.
--Paul C. Sereno et al.
Lakeside Cemeteries in the Sahara: 5000 Years of Holocene Population and Environmental Change
At the moment, there are only two copies, dating back to the ninth and the fourteenth centuries. The first of these manuscripts is known as the Palatinus Graecus 398 and can be studied in the University Library of Heidelberg. The other text is the Vatopedinus 655; parts of it are in the British Museum in London and in the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris.
[...]
At the below webiste on the right column is commentary on the above text, about what old places names mentioned correspond to West African place names we know today:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: ^^ typical Troll Patrol answer. Son Ra asks him what is the manuscript about and Troll Patrol's answer is "yes lioness mentioned it"
Is that an answer to the question?
What if someboy doesn't feel like reading 10 pages you post because they don't know what the 10 pages are supposed to be about.
I supposeldy posted this. If I did I don't even remember what it was about
Son of Ra what is it about I forgot ?
You should be thankful to me, on your knees. But instead? SMH
I expect geisha manners from you.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
I admit I was rushed when posting earlier today. Looked like you were talking about the Tjemehu from Ramses III tomb KV11, if not accept my apology.
It doesn't matter what other depictions show the Tamehu painted in KV11 are not dark. Also other TMHHW of the Book of Gates scene 30 are lite brite. See them in Merneptah KV8 and in Seti KV17.
If I give these links will you click them to learn more?
Tjehenu the earliest known Libyans to the AE were uniformily painted dark. Tjemehu otoh varied in complexion. Also Temehu in New Kingdom times was apparently genetic for Libyan and could include Libu/Rebu, Meshwesh, and others.
IMO it's piss poor methodology to refuse to see what's plainly right in front of your eyes because it seems to support cauca-whatever presence in Africa.
We don't need that kind of African studies, it'd be as false and groundless as the works of the Eurocentric Africanists you rail against.
Maybe you and certain others need a feel good history but I'd rather have it as close to what it was as we can reconstruct it.
quote:Originally posted by Son of Ra: @Tukuler
What??? It seems you can't read or grasp the argument at hand.
1. I said the coins could be of a Nubian people, because Nubians were known for supplying Carthage with their elephants, so I heard. And I also heard those coins could be of a Nubian person. Had nothing to do with hieroglyphics. Truthcentric was the one that brought up the coins. 2. I said the paint was faded...Well because it is and you can clearly see some of the darker colors on it. Not only that, I said it because some people would use that painting as proof of pale Skin Caucasoid roaming Africa, which is not rare because Eurocentrics always love to post faded paintings as representatives of pale skin people being in Africa. Most paintings I've seen on the Libyans, they were brown skinned no different from the Ancient Egyptians.
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
also saying that some Libyans were dark doesn't prove that the darker Libyans in Egyptian art were indigenous Africans.
They may have been they may not have been.
The man above is an example of a dark person who is not necessrily primarily of African ancestry, So saying "the paints faded" doesn't apply
The early history of the berbers is a question mark
quote: The Garamantes flourished in southwestern Libya, in the core of the Sahara Desert ~3,000 years ago and largely controlled trans-Saharan trade. Their biological affinities to other North African populations, including the Egyptian, Algerian, Tunisian and Sudanese, roughly contemporary to them, are examined by means of cranial nonmetric traits using the Mean Measure of Divergence and Mahalanobis D(2) distance. The aim is to shed light on the extent to which the Sahara Desert inhibited extensive population movements and gene flow. Our results show that the Garamantes possess distant affinities to their neighbors. This relationship may be due to the Central Sahara forming a barrier among groups, despite the archaeological evidence for extended networks of contact. The role of the Sahara as a barrier is further corroborated by the significant correlation between the Mahalanobis D(2) distance and geographic distance between the Garamantes and the other populations under study. In contrast, no clear pattern was observed when all North African populations were examined, indicating that there was no uniform gene flow in the region.
--Nikita E, Mattingly D, Lahr MM.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012 Feb;147(2):280-92. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21645. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
Sahara: Barrier or corridor? Nonmetric cranial traits and biological affinities of North African late Holocene populations.
Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge, UK.
quote: Origin & Etymology of Garama:
It is far from sure to ascertain the etymology of the name Garama or Garamantes, but we do have a few suggestions to explore. As it is often the case, the Greeks preserved a considerable amount of Libyan history in their borrowed mythology, which Roberts Graves (in his Greek Myths) rightly compares to corrupted polit.
Origin & Etymology of Garama:
It is far from sure to ascertain the etymology of the name Garama or Garamantes, but we do have a few suggestions to explore. As it is often the case, the Greeks preserved a considerable amount of Libyan history in their borrowed mythology, which Roberts Graves (in his Greek Myths) rightly compares to corrupted political cartoons; and therefore one can wade through its chapters in search of forgotten clues. The Greeks knew of the Garamantes’ ancestor Garamas as ‘the first of men’, which is a reference to the antiquity of this legendary people. According to the Greek Olympian creation myth the Earth’s first children of semi-human form were the hundred-handed giants Briareus, Gyges and Cottus, but according to Robert Graves the Libyans claim that Garamas was born before the Hundred-handed Ones. Robert Graves further relates that the name Garamantes is derived from the words gara, man, and te, meaning ‘Gara’s state people’; where Gara is the Goddess Ker or Q’re who went on to become the Italian divinatory goddess Carmenta (‘Car the Wise’). He also points out that the Garamantian settlement of Amon was joined with the Northern Greek settlement of Dodona in a religious league which, according to Sir Flinders Petrie, may have originated as early as the third millennium BC. The Garamantes connection with Amon is further indicated by the Nasamones, whose ancestor Nasamon himself descended from the legendary Garamas, the ancestor of the Garamantes, who appeared in mythology as the Son of the Sun and who offered Mother Earth a sacrifice of the sweet acorn.
This obscure history was the source of confusion. Dr. M. S. Ayoub (Fezzan, p.19), in quoting Apolionius of Rhodes, relates a Greek legend which refers to Garama as the grandson of the Cretan King Minos, who was born on the shores of Lake Tritonis in Libya, and concludes that the Garamantes had been living on the shores between present-day Zuwarah in Libya and Gabes in Tunisia (p. 45), an area that includes the legendary Lake Tritonis, where Libyan Poseidon allegedly ruled Atlantis; in total agreement, Dr. Ayoub relates, with lbn Khaldun who stated that Germanah (Germa) was first settled by the Laguanten tribe, who also inhabited the coastal regions of Tripolitania; before he went on to add that they fled the coastal region and immigrated to Fezzan as a result of the Phoenicians' arrival. In support of his confused supposition Dr. Ayoub says: "On the mountain of Zenkekra in Germa, people are drawn with plumes on their heads which resembles drawings in Egyptian texts showing the maritime peoples." There is no doubt that the plume is a Libyan feature generally agreed on by most scholars and in fact the Egyptians themselves always represented Libyan gods and goddesses with plumes, as in the case of Libyan Amen, Libyan Ament and Libyan Shu, long before the arrival of the sea-people. Moreover there are a number of scholars who argue to the contrary - in that the Cretans themselves were a Libyan colony. It has been already stated that a Libyan settlement was expelled from their homes in the now called Egyptian Delta during the forced unification of Egypt, by Menas, and subsequently left for Crete between 4000 and 3000 BC, long way before the Minoan or Cretan civilisation was created. The same view was maintained by Robert Graves; by Elinor W. Gadon (The Once & Future Goddess); by Sir Arthur Evans (1901), the discoverer of the Cretan civilisation itself; and by Professor Flinders Petrie who pointed out that the similarity between certain Cretan characters and the prehistoric Libyan and Egyptian early forms of writing was not the work of coincidence.
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol aka Ish Gebor:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: ^^^ as usual
make a point in YOUR OWN WORDS first like normal posters do and then post quotes after that
I could go into that same quote you out up and make four differnt conclusions from it
As usually I debunk you with peer reviewed scholarship.
that's right usually you follow me around and dont make your own threads, real talk
Let's get real here.
If people post in their own words, you'll dismiss them as untrue etc...
And at the same time you will C/P wiki pages, pseudo blogs. Etc...
You are a joke! A African American woman impostor. A liar, a deceiver! And it hurts you, every time when I destroy your so-called white supremacy. And in your delusional mind you think you really can fool peeps here. BIGOT!
quote: The Garamantian civilization flourished in modern Fezzan, Libya, between 900 BC and 500 AD, during which the aridification of the Sahara was well established. Study of the archaeological remains suggests a population successful at coping with a harsh environment of high and fluctuating temperatures and reduced water and food resources. This study explores the activity patterns of the Garamantes by means of cross-sectional geometric properties. Long bone diaphyseal shape and rigidity are compared between the Garamantes and populations from Egypt and Sudan, namely from the sites of Kerma, el-Badari, and Jebel Moya, to determine whether the Garamantian daily activities were more strenuous than those of other North African populations. Moreover, sexual dimorphism and bilateral asymmetry are assessed at an intra- and inter-population level. The inter-population comparisons showed the Garamantes not to be more robust than the comparative populations, suggesting that the daily Garamantian activities necessary for survival in the Sahara Desert did not generally impose greater loads than those of other North African populations. Sexual dimorphism and bilateral asymmetry in almost all geometric properties of the long limbs were comparatively low among the Garamantes. Only the lower limbs were significantly stronger among males than females, possibly due to higher levels of mobility associated with herding. The lack of systematic bilateral asymmetry in cross-sectional geometric properties may relate to the involvement of the population in bilaterally intensive activities or the lack of regular repetition of unilateral activities.
--Nikita E, Siew YY, Stock J, Mattingly D, Lahr MM.
Activity patterns in the Sahara Desert: an interpretation based on cross-sectional geometric properties.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 Nov;146(3):423-34. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21597. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Here's another mask for ya, enjoy!
Fig. 204. Mask of a Negro. Mid 4th century BCE. Terracotta. H: 22.5 cm. London, British Museum.
Before anyone blames me for the caption it's directly from Snowden's chapter in Image of the Black in Western Art vol 1 the original edition not the new one
For other ancient Africa Minor blacks see Algerian mosaics. Three of the images there are from Europe, these blacks are most likely the closest Africans to Europe, i.e., "Libyans."
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric: I was just browsing Google image search for Carthaginian artifacts, and apparently they made masks with evidence for facial scars!
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol aka Ish Gebor: [Let's get real here.
If people post in their own words, you'll dismiss them as untrue etc...
And at the same time you will C/P wiki pages, pseudo blogs. Etc...
You are a joke! A African American woman impostor. A liar, a deceiver! And it hurts you, every time when I destroy your so-called white supremacy. [/QB]
the proper way to do thinks is make a point in your own words and then if you feel it necessary to back that point with references. (Except if you are starting a new thread and post an article to be discussed)
If you wrote a book the entire thing would be a bibliography-realer talk
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol aka Ish Gebor: [Let's get real here.
If people post in their own words, you'll dismiss them as untrue etc...
And at the same time you will C/P wiki pages, pseudo blogs. Etc...
You are a joke! A African American woman impostor. A liar, a deceiver! And it hurts you, every time when I destroy your so-called white supremacy.
the proper way to do thinks is make a point in your own words and then if you feel it necessary to back that point with references. (Except if you are starting a new thread and post an article to be discussed)
If you wrote a book the entire thing would be a bibliography-realer talk [/QB]
Shut the hell up, pseudo, Wikipedia copy passing white supremacist Appalachian, African American woman impostor.
I have one goal only, and only one goal. That is destroying your white supremacy claims.
When I write a book it will be loaded with reference material. And direct fieldwork. Yes, indeed!
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
I don't have a scanner and so can't post page 81 from J. A. Rogers' Sex and Race Vol. 1 but here's a sampling of like coinage.
Undescored text above by me for your analytic attention.
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Was Hannibal black?
Most likely not in any appreciable sense. The coins with a black man on one side and an elephant on the other are not of Carthaginian mint and were very small change. This is one time I disagree with J. A. Rogers' research sources.
By Hannibaal's time Phoenician blood must have been very thin and the folk of Khart Haddas' land at it's founding, the Aurigha (sp) were a black people but art pieces of the Barca family do not bear features of the blacks in contemporaneous or later mosaics, http://thenile.phpbb-host.com/ftopic2316.php not even the features of the terra-cotta
statuette of the god Baal currently in the Bardo Museum in Tunis which has wide nose, tightly curled hair and thick lips in contrast to the thin-featured sphinx attached to the arm of his throne.
Hannibaal could have been anything in between black and blond as were the north coastal Africans of his era but there's no solid evidence of exactly where in that spectrum he precisely fits.
Carthaginian coins representing Hannibal really just show the archetype of a hero. The portrait is nearly indistinguishable from Herakles or Alexander similarly found on Phoenician shekel coinage from Tyre.
Other coins with an elephant on one side and a face on the other are thought by some to show Hannibaal by others to only be mahouts. Some of the faces on these coins probably do in fact depict Punic blacks unless the mahouts were recruited from elsewhere in Africa where elephants served as war engines.
Anyway, as can be seen in the quotes ranging in time from -1000 to the 3rd century, the Greeks didn't class the Imazighen among peoples like themselves. They were viewed as the lightest in complexion of the dark peoples of the world. Even as late as the 8th century, an Arabic taxonomist still classes Imazighen alongside the darks and not among the whites. So, it is very unlikely Hannibal was white by either ancient or modern criteria.
Experts disagree on the identity of the portrait; many identifying it as the god Melquarth, others as Hannibal or his father. 13769. Silver half shekel, SNG Cop 383, choice EF, Carthage mint,
A silver double shekel minted by Hannibal's family around 230 B.C. The front depicts the Carthaginian god Melqart as Hercules and the reverse shows a war elephant.
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Representation of a war elephant. It is the decoration of a Roman bed rest. Eyes and veins are inlaid with silver. Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
The rhetorical posts above was to be expected. So predictable. SMH
Anyway, Tukuler do you have any information on the Serir Tibesti/Kufra Basin and Fezzan Basin/Serir Tibesti?
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Right now I have very little my ext stg directory got trashed -- costs >$800 to maybe restore only parts of it
I m starting from scratch except for what I can salvage from ES TNV ESR
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Trying to find the thread where I mentioned Doc Ben in Blackman o/t Nile & His Family and Ampim's studies make no remark about Ramesses III's Libyans being dark in contrast to Finch saying they were.
quote:Originally posted by Tukuler: Right now I have very little my ext stg directory got trashed -- costs >$800 to maybe restore only parts of it
I m starting from scratch except for what I can salvage from ES TNV ESR
sorry
My advice, get yourself a Server, with hotswap backup and private cloud station. A Synology for example.
A two bay is efficient enough.
A direct and cheap solution to your problem could be a: USB 2.0 IDE & SATA recovery.
quote: From these radiated a complex network of surface channels, some of which could be traced directly to settlement sites with Garamantian and Roman pottery, strikingly confirming the Garamantian date of the foggaras previously postulated on the basis of a much broader spatial association with ancient settlements.
[...]
To this end, we have conducted survey in two main zones, examining in detail the escarp- ment between the Royal Cemetery and Zinkekr ̄a, a linear distance of 4.5 km, along which we have logged >5,500 burials, and on the west side of the T ̄aqallit promontory where we have recorded 4,000 burials in a sector of c. 4 km length.
--David Mattingly, Nadia Khalaf et al.
Libyan Studies 42 (2011)
Excavations and Survey of the so-called Garamantian Royal Cemetery (GSC030−031)
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Yes I was talking about the Tjemehu IIRC they were depicted as no different from the Ancient Egyptians. Correct me if I am wrong.
And I already seen the thread in the first link. And what do you mean feel good history??? Are you implying that to me?
Posts: 1135 | From: Top secret | Registered: Jun 2012
| IP: Logged |
Yes I was talking about the Tjemehu IIRC they were depicted as no different from the Ancient Egyptians. Correct me if I am wrong.
And I already seen the thread in the first link. And what do you mean feel good history??? Are you implying that to me?
If I'm not mistaken, the above dressed as Egyptians are Egyptians including govenors of Dakhla and or Kharga and oasis, Libyan regions the Egyptians had taken control of.
posted
^ it looks a bit like proto-Tifinagh. And considering the presence of the Garamantes this is likely. It's also precisely what I have cited earlier on in the; "Origin & Etymology of Garama".
quote: The Tuareg (also Twareg or Touareg, Berber: Imuhagh, besides regional ethnyms) are a Berber nomadic pastoralist people. They are the principal inhabitants of the Saharan interior of North Africa.[2][3] They call themselves variously Kel Tamasheq or Kel Tamajaq ("Speakers of Tamasheq"), Imuhagh, Imazaghan or Imashaghen ("the Free people"), or Kel Tagelmust, i.e., "People of the Veil".[4] The name Tuareg was applied to them by early explorers and historians (since Leo Africanus).[citation needed]
The origin and meaning of the name Twareg has long been debated with various etymologies advanced, although it would appear that Twārəg is derived from the "broken plural" of Tārgi, a name whose former meaning was "inhabitant of Targa" (the Tuareg name of the Libyan region commonly known as Fezzan. Targa in Berber means "(drainage) channel", see Alojali et al. 2003: 656, s.v. "Targa").
If I read it correctly, it says something like: The lioness is a liar.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Yes I was talking about the Tjemehu IIRC they were depicted as no different from the Ancient Egyptians. Correct me if I am wrong.
And I already seen the thread in the first link. And what do you mean feel good history??? Are you implying that to me?
I on purpose did not include these in my initial posts earlier on, when talking about the Garamantes.
But, these are likely proto-Tuareg i.e. proto-Garamantes.
quote:The Garamantes flourished in southwestern Libya, in the core of the Sahara Desert ~3,000 years ago and largely controlled trans-Saharan trade.
Their biological affinities to other North African populations, including the Egyptian, Algerian, Tunisian and Sudanese, roughly contemporary to them, are examined by means of cranial nonmetric traits using the Mean Measure of Divergence and Mahalanobis D(2) distance.
--Nikita E, Mattingly D, Lahr MM. et al.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012 Feb;147(2):280-92. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21645. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
Sahara: Barrier or corridor? Nonmetric cranial traits and biological affinities of North African late Holocene populations.
quote:The area around Gobero consists of Cretaceous sandstones that are likely to exhibit 87Sr/86Sr = 0.709–0.710, based on strontium isotope signatures from similar bedrock and archaeological human remains in Egypt and Libya [46], [47].
--Paul C. Sereno et al.
Lakeside Cemeteries in the Sahara: 5000 Years of Holocene Population and Environmental Change