posted
@Lioness. Well, to tell the truth, if we go by the DNA TRIBES database comparison with the Amarnas modern Egyptians are NOT closely related to the AEians.
Analysis of the modern Egyptians show they are the most admixed of ALL Africans. The only foreign admixture coming through J2 from Turks.
Keep in mind the extant Levantines are primarily Turks dominated now . The original inhabitants, bedouins, are 2nd class citizens. They were overun by Turks.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] @Lioness. Well, to tell the truth, if we go by the DNA TRIBES database comparison with the Amarnas modern Egyptians are NOT closely related to the AEians.
Analysis of the modern Egyptians show they are the most admixed of ALL Africans. The only foreign admixture coming through J2 from Turks.
So if their J2 is 18% That means the rest of of their DNA, 82% is African
That means modern Egyptians are 32% more African than Barack Obama who is about 50% African (50 + 32 = 82%)
The Amarna period lasted about 20 years. Due to the policies of Akhenaten the kings of the Amarna period were striken from the Egyptian record. But assuming that dynastic Egyptians prior to the Amarna had DNA similar to the Amarna and keeping in mind you say that modern Egyptians are largely African (82%) you also say that according to DNA Tribes modern Egyptians are not closely related to the Amarna
that means that if the Amarna represent dynastic Egyptians generally and modern Egyptians are largely African (82%) yet not similar to them then modern Egyptians are largely Africans foreign to Egypt
So where did they come from? What other part of Africa?
And where in the history of Egypt after the Amarna is there a mass migration of foreign Africans into Egypt?
Posts: 43054 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] @Lioness. Well, to tell the truth, if we go by the DNA TRIBES database comparison with the Amarnas modern Egyptians are NOT closely related to the AEians.
Analysis of the modern Egyptians show they are the most admixed of ALL Africans. The only foreign admixture coming through J2 from Turks.
So if their J2 is 18% That means the rest of of their DNA, 82% is African
That means modern Egyptians are 32% more African than Barack Obama who is about 50% African (50 + 32 = 82%)
The Amarna period lasted about 20 years. Due to the policies of Akhenaten the kings of the Amarna period were striken from the Egyptian record. But assuming that dynastic Egyptians prior to the Amarna had DNA similar to the Amarna and keeping in mind you say that modern Egyptians are largely African (82%) you also say that according to DNA Tribes modern Egyptians are not closely related to the Amarna
that means that if the Amarna represent dynastic Egyptians generally and modern Egyptians are largely African (82%) yet not similar to them then modern Egyptians are largely Africans foreign to Egypt
So where did they come from? What other part of Africa?
And where in the history of Egypt after the Amarna is there a mass migration of foreign Africans into Egypt?
As Doug explained before. Depending on where samples are being taken you will have a different outcome. And I agree with Doug wholeheartedly on that. What Obama has to do with this is beyond me. Posts: 22249 | From: Omni | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic