Topic: Modern Day North Africans who Exhibit 'Archaic' Features
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
You're an anti-black agenda joker and I won't take you seriously anymore though I did try to this past season.
You showed real promise but in the end really let me down.
Leukaethiops were far south of the Mauri whose very name means black in Greek (ancient and modern). Just goto GOOGLE TRANSLATE from English to Greek and key in black.
quote:Originally posted by the lyinass: Your [Djehuti's] theory is based on True Blacksim
ignoring both Manilius who described Mauri as lighter than medium tone as well as Ptolemy and Pliny on Leucæthiopians
LOL You still try to spin what Manilius actually meant!
Apparently Takruri had hope in you, since you let him down. I on the other hand put no hope or faith in a Euronut whore who spreads her lies like STDs.
According to Manilius' list of dark/BLACK peoples from darkest to lightest:
Egyptians who lie smack dab in between the others are medium tone among the blacks NOT all peoples, you lying whore! LOL
The Aforans and Maures are lighter than the Egyptians but they are still considered dark or BLACK by Manilius!
From Snowden: The Mauri, another northwest African people whose color received frequent notice, were at times described as 'nigri' (black) and 'adusti' (scorched).
So quit with the pig sh*t. Posts: 26239 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Swenet: But Shiqmim is a site, not a culture or phase. How do you know that cranium I posted earlier is associated with this complex (PPN)? Or was it only inhabited during this period? Thanks for that paper BTW.
I know Shiqmim is a site, but when I did a search on it featuring Smith, that is the first thing I found along with other sources relating to it. So that is probably where the skull is from since the site featured a number of male skulls with mandibles missing.
Posts: 26239 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lyinass: Your [Djehuti's] theory is based on True Blacksim
ignoring both Manilius who described Mauri as lighter than medium tone as well as Ptolemy and Pliny on Leucæthiopians
LOL You still try to spin what Manilius actually meant!
Apparently Takruri had hope in you, since you let him down. I on the other hand put no hope or faith in a Euronut whore who spreads her lies like STDs.
According to Manilius' list of dark/BLACK peoples from darkest to lightest:
Egyptians who lie smack dab in between the others are medium tone among the blacks NOT all peoples, you lying whore! LOL
The Aforans and Maures are lighter than the Egyptians but they are still considered dark or BLACK by Manilius!
From Snowden: The Mauri, another northwest African people whose color received frequent notice, were at times described as 'nigri' (black) and 'adusti' (scorched).
So quit with the pig sh*t.
Bitch keep up, I made numerous posts in The Manilius thread exemplifying the medium skin tone of the dark set described by Manilius all of these folks below being examples of that skin tone:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
the land of Egypt, flooded by the Nile, darkens bodies more mildly owing to the inundation of its fields: it it a country nearer to us and its moderate climate imparts a medium tone.
posted
^ LOL B|tch, who is you fooling?! That collage of photos of modern people have NOTHING to do with the ancient black peoples whom Manilius is referring to! You post North Asians and then a (modern) Maghrebi man of obvious mixed ancestry and Will Smith a modern light-skinned African American who also has mixed ancestry. We are talking about ANCIENT indigenous peoples who lived south of the Romans and were called DARK/BLACK by the Romans!
Posts: 26239 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti: ^ LOL B|tch, who is you fooling?! That collage of photos of modern people have NOTHING to do with the ancient black peoples whom Manilius is referring to! You post North Asians and then a (modern) Maghrebi man of obvious mixed ancestry and Will Smith a modern light-skinned African American who also has mixed ancestry. We are talking about ANCIENT indigenous peoples who lived south of the Romans and were called DARK/BLACK by the Romans!
Notice how Djehutie will never call Will Smith black though the ancient Greeks most certainly would.
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
Another idiotic red-herring. Will Smith, a modern day African American is called 'black' despite his very light complexion for political reasons in that he has black ancestry. This has no bearing on Manilius and his ancient peers who referred to the peoples to their south in Africa due to their very dark complexions.
This is why you never bothered to respond to the Snowden quote where he admitted the Romans called the Maure (allegedly the lightest blacks in Manilius list) as nigri (black).
Posts: 26239 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^^Not only that but his 'Negroid' features...Skin complexion means ****...
Posts: 1135 | From: Top secret | Registered: Jun 2012
| IP: Logged |
Another idiotic red-herring. Will Smith, a modern day African American is called 'black' despite his very light complexion for political reasons in that he has black ancestry. This has no bearing on Manilius and his ancient peers who referred to the peoples to their south in Africa due to their very dark complexions.
This is why you never bothered to respond to the Snowden quote where he admitted the Romans called the Maure (allegedly the lightest blacks in Manilius list) as nigri (black).
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti:
According to Manilius' list of dark/BLACK peoples from darkest to lightest:
according to your quote Manilius describes Indians as blacker than Egyptians and "Afrorans" as being lighter than the Egyptians and the Maure (later "Moors"- meaning BLACK) being lighter still.
Using the above photo of the King Tut wood bust photgraphed in a darkly lit gallery (I'll allow it to help you) lets see an example of the following lighter than Egyptian listed>
"Afroran"
and the lighter still
Maure (later "Moors"- meaning BLACK)
If necessry I will cut out the faces and put them next to each other. Rememer as per Manilus each discernably lighter than the previous 'BLACK' person
posted
LOL At the above, so now all Africans need to have to similar skin tone in order to comprise the racist Eurocentric stereotype.
Despite of living in different reigns and climates!LOL
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Do you have any idea what a cline is? At one end is the quantified extreme. At the other is its least expression.
No discrete abutted monocolor blocks. That would be a clineless bar graph.
I don't take Manilius to mean India had no one of Aethiopian darkness or vice versa but that there is always some interlap with some exclusion.
A cluster approach showing overlap
as best my tool allows no egg shape ovals or slanted ovals and no ovals I did make are absolute just a visual way to percieve Manilius' data.
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ You are correct, Tukulor. Manilius writings are quite clear no matter who tries to spin it. Speaking of which...
quote:Originally posted by the lyinass twit,: according to your quote Manilius describes Indians as blacker than Egyptians and "Afrorans" as being lighter than the Egyptians and the Maure (later "Moors"- meaning BLACK) being lighter still.
Using the above photo of the King Tut wood bust photgraphed in a darkly lit gallery (I'll allow it to help you) lets see an example of the following lighter than Egyptian listed>
"Afroran"
and the lighter still
Maure (later "Moors"- meaning BLACK)
If necessary I will cut out the faces and put them next to each other. Remember as per Manilus each discernibly lighter than the previous 'BLACK' person
unless you're scared
-lioness
B|tch nobody's scared except YOU which is why you are desperately spinning and outright LYING.
posted
^ LMAO There's no "trick" at all. Even in the shadows, one can clearly see the above are all BLACK peoples!
In your case it's the old out your lyinass trick. So either discuss the actual topic of this thread which is archaic features or take your lyinass complaints in the thread where it belongs. Posts: 26239 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Embarrassed]](redface.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic