posted
A new analysis interpreting Nilotic relationships and peopling of the Nile Valley – K Godde July 2018
Abstract The process of the peopling of the Nile Valley likely shaped the population structure and early biological similarity of Egyptians and Nubians. As others have noted, affinity among Nilotic populations was due to an aggregation of events, including environmental, linguistic, and sociopolitical changes over a great deal of time. This study seeks to evaluate the relationships of Nubian and Egyptian groups in the context of the original peopling event. Cranial nonmetric traits from 18 Nubian and Egyptian samples, spanning Lower Egypt to Lower Nubia and approximately 7400 years, were analyzed using Mahalanobis D2 as a measure of biological distance. A principal coordinates analysis and spatial-temporal model were applied to these data. The results reveal temporal and spatial patterning consistent with documented events in Egyptian and Nubian population history. Moreover, the Mesolithic Nubian sample clustered with later Nubian and Egyptian samples, indicating that events prior to the Mesolithic were important in shaping the later genetic patterning of the Nubian population. Later contact through the establishment of the Egyptian fort at Buhen, Kerma’s position as a strategic trade center along the Nile, and Egyptian colonization at Tombos **maintained **genetic similarity among the populations.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
To those who can read the ancient Egyptian text…is this true? We know Europeans lie and spin. Was there a difference and adversarial events between Nubians and Egyptians? Some of the old guards on here like Sage? And Wally etc mentioned that there was no difference between Nubians and Egyptians
Quote: “In 2005, Keita proffered a novel method to view Nubian-Egyptian relationships; he suggested that military interactions could not alone account for the biological similarities among the two populations. Rather, Keita (2005) saw the relationship as a continuum, dating back to the late Pleistocene and mid-Holocene, placing importance on the peopling of the Nile Valley as the initial cause for genetic similarity. Linguistic family dispersals, environmental pressures, and other sociopolitical events were tied to occupation and subsequent affinity.
Moreover, the military provided opportunity for contact as Nubians were mercenaries in the Egyptian army and the Egyptian army fought against Nubians (Trigger, 1976).”
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: We know Europeans lie and spin.
then stop reading their articles fool
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Are they saying here that the ruling elite of ancient Egypt were Nubians?
Quote: “For example, a **closer** affinity has been detected of the wealthy Nubian A-Group **to **elite Egyptians than elite Egyptians were to other Egyptians (Prowse and Lovell, 1996). At Tombos in Lower Nubia, long term Egyptian occupation led to homogenization of the two different populations over the Napatan period (Smith and Buzon, 2014). Smith and Buzon (2014) describe peaceful interactions that likely led to the biological similitude formed over time.”
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] Are they saying here that the ruling elite of ancient Egypt were Nubians?
If they said that the ruling elite of ancient Egypt were Nubians it must be a lie because we know Europeans lie
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Burials in a cemetery at el-Kurru, which spans through the building of first pyramids of the kings of Napata, hold similarities with mid-second millennium BCE elite burials, thus potentially dating them to the Late Kerma period (Edwards, 2004). Moreover, one of the early tumuli from el-Kurru date to approximately mid-second millennium BCE (Edwards, 2004) and burials at Tombos date to 1400 BCE (Smith and Buzon, 2014) providing further evidence of the movement of the Kerma Nubians areas further south.
To describe Predynastic Egypt, one must tell of the independent development of two regions, Lower (represented by Naqada) and Upper (e.g., Maadi-Buto), whose political, social, and material remains are distinctive. Little is known about the transition from small agricultural groups to political unification (Bard, 1994), as the archaeological record is limited primarily to cemeteries and grave goods in Upper Egypt (Bard, 1992; Savage, 2001) and the reverse in Lower Egypt (Savage, 2001). Thus, knowledge of this pivotal time is constrained by mortuary contexts that are not necessarily representative of the great society in Upper Egypt. Despite this limitation, much has been derived from what remains and theorized into the greater context of state formation in Egypt. Three models have been put forth to explain the sociopolitical unification of the north and south that have drastically different genetic implications. The assimilation model (Buchez and Midant-Reynes, 2011) states that a “Naqadization” of the north (originally hypothesized by Kaiser (1957)) where the southern Egyptian groups migrated to the north and engaged in military conquest, leading to genetic swamping of the north by the south, was not necessarily the mechanism for cultural and political unification during the Predynastic period. Instead, the assimilation model posits Lower Egypt adopted cultural practices of Naqada willingly from contact between the two regions, which would eliminate the need for mass migrations and conquest (Buchez and Midant-Reynes, 2011). Similarly, the interactionist model proffers that the north and south are one culture, with different regional variations, whose similarities are a result of their socioeconomic relationship (Köhler, 1995, 2008). The assimilation and interaction models are supported by archaeological evidence (c.f., Buchez and Midant-Reynes, 2011; Köhler, 1995, 2008) and biological evidence modeled from Predynastic groups (Keita and Godde, 2016).
A recent article that examined the genetics of Egyptian mummies suggests great early contact with the Near East near this formative time (Schuenemann et al., 2017), but the results must be viewed with caution as only 151 individuals from a single site were examined, and thus making broad conclusions across Egyptians as an entire population is premature.
xyyman comment: Seems like even this author did not realize that ONLY 3 mummies were analyzed and published for their autosomes. I tell you man, Europeans can spin. Even this author got faked out! As for the haplogroups the Abusir were mostly related to …you guess it!….Nubians!(Sudanese).
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
xyyman comment: Seems like even this author did not realize that ONLY 3 mummies were analyzed and published for their autosomes. I tell you man, Europeans can spin. Even this author got faked out! As for the haplogroups the Abusir were mostly related to …you guess it!….Nubians!(Sudanese). [/QB]
African Journals OnLine (AJOL) is the world’s largest online library of peer-reviewed, African-published scholarly journals.
posted
How did the OP get his hands on the full text of the article? All I've been able to dig up on Google are abstracts. Which is a shame, because this looks like a cool paper.
quote:Originally posted by Tyrannohotep: How did the OP get his hands on the full text of the article? All I've been able to dig up on Google are abstracts. Which is a shame, because this looks like a cool paper.
I have my contacts now…..I have a fairy god-father. Someone likes me out there. Almost any paper I want can be forwarded to me.
Discussion The Egyptian and Nubian samples grouped by population (the Egyptians were located towards the center of the graph while the Nubians plotted around the Egyptians on the periphery), without forming separate clusters. Variation was high among the samples, but low within. Spatial patterning was significant in statistical tests and visually grouped according to geographic region on the PCO chart (Fig. 2). Thus, the first part of the hypothesis was supported that Keita’s (2005) model describes the patterns seen in these data. Regarding the second component, the patterning of these relationships must be examined through the individual and joint population histories of the Egyptians and the Nubians, along with the knowledge of events in the Paleolithic. The hiatus groups (A- and C-Groups, Middle Horizon Nubians and Meroitic Nubians) show no biological evidence of a new population inhabiting Nubia or a population that genetically assimilated into another population and then returned (cranial nonmetric traits have not been demonstrated to adapt to the local environment in the same manner as craniometrics and so interpretations do not need to be shaped by this caveat). It is important to temper the discussion of A- and C-Group relationships with the knowledge of no hiatus and with the strong genetic drift component of their population history (as is evidenced in the results here and in Godde (2009b, 2013b, 2018)) where Nubian samples tend to cluster by site. Thus, the position of the Sayala C-Group on the fringe of the samples is consistent with Godde (2009b, 2013b, 2018) and is likely a result of genetic drift when considering their position along the Nile and sociocultural practices, and not a result of new or returning peoples from a hiatus. C-Group settlements were small, widespread, and practiced endogamy (Strouhal and Jungwirth, 1984). This initial interpretation of endogamy is supported by Smith (1998) who proffers they were resistant to Egyptianization, unlike another Middle Horizon Nubian group: the Kerma people. Thus, it
is not surprising that both C-Group samples are positioned in exterior points on the PCO plot. Interestingly, the Pan-Grave people (another Middle Horizon Nubian group), who usually plot in extreme outlying positions of Nubian PCO plots (c.f., Godde, 2009b, 2013b; Godde, 2018), are located near the X-Group and Semna South Christian samples. However, the R matrix tells us the Pan-Grave people were more internally homogeneous, probably as a result of genetic drift and/or low levels of gene flow. The Pan-Grave people are thought to have been Medjay posted by the Egyptians to watch the C-Group (Trigger, 1976). An alternative explanation advanced by Adams (1977) is that they were a nomadic group of Nubians occupying the Eastern Desert. Their mortuary practices were unique, having buried their dead in oval-shaped graves in C-Group cemeteries and further away from the river and into the desert (Trigger, 1976).
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Quote: “The close relationship of Badari, Naqada, and Kerma present in several studies (e.g., Godde, 2009a; Keita, 1990; Nutter, 1958) was not detectable here. The addition of a number of Nubian samples not included in prior work allowed a different depiction of the nature of the relationship of Kerma to the Predynastic samples to come to light, and which is in line with their shared population history. Thousands of years separate the Predynastic and Kerma samples, which, in combination with gene flow, will act as a homogenizing force (Konigsberg, 1990; c.f., Godde, 2009a), so it is possible that gene flow from later Egyptian groups led to an affinity among the Predynastic Egyptians and people from Kerma and explains why there is still a close relationship present in the PCO graph. However, under a model of population history, later northern Egyptians should also cluster more closely with southern Predynastic groups than with Nubians. When taking into account the peaceful interactions of the assimilation (Buchez and Midant- Reynes, 2011) and interaction (Köhler, 1995, 2008) models, it is anticipated the northern and southern Egyptians should be closely related. In that vein, it is expected that the Gizeh, Lisht, Cairo, and Coptic samples would plot more closely to the Badari and Naqada groups, which is true of Gizeh (Last Dynastic Period), Lisht (Middle Kingdom), and the Coptic group. Cairo is more remotely located on the plot, probably related to higher levels of genetic drift/low amounts of gene flow, but there is nothing to suggest that its distance is evidence of anything more than a composite sample including individuals from Omdurman about which little information is known. The skeletal differences between Predynastic and Early Dynastic samples have been viewed as markedly profound in the past, causing scholars to hypothesize a foreign population had entered the area and were in place during the Early Dynastic (e.g., Derry, 1956). There are documented cranial differences between the Predynastic and later Egyptians, however, in this analysis, within group variation was not high in the Predynastic and Lisht (closest sample to post-date the Predynastic) samples and, while they did not plot adjacent to each other, there is **nothing to indicate** in the PCO plot the intrusion of a foreign group. Instead, it appears the Predynastic were likely adapted to a harsher, earlier environment and resource acquisition and the later Egyptians to the lifeways afforded by their civilization. Badari and Naqada still plotted adjacent to one another, which also makes sense spatially (Upper Egypt) and temporally (Predynastic), and is consistent with craniometric assessment of Predynastic groups (Keita and Godde, 2016). Small biological distances were found between Kerma and Gizeh and Kerma and Lisht, three samples that were internally homogeneous, and are expected considering the history of contact between Egypt and Nubia. During the C-Group (a Middle Horizon Nubian contemporary with Lisht from the Middle Kingdom), Egypt occupied Lower Nubia (where the C-Group was located). “
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Quote: “The knowledge gained from this paper contributes to the overall body of literature on Egyptian and Nubian relationships. It supports much in the archaeological literature, making it an important confirmation of the archaeology and a different source of corroboratory evidence. Naturally, bias may have affected some of these results as they may be spurious and/or related to the common environment these populations share, leading to similar adaptations in each. Moreover, small sample size in a few samples (n < 30) may have caused these results to be not necessarily fully reflective of individuals at the sites/time periods represented. However, as these are archaeological samples and in these cases no further material exists for these particular sites/time periods, the Samples should not be ignored, and rather interpreted with caution. Other studies (e.g., Bedrick et al., 2000; Konigsberg, 1990) have successfully used similar sample sizes and/or number of variables using the same biological distance statistic, and so this study joins them with similar trait and sample size restrictions.” ”
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Huh?!! Are you saying the people who emailed me these papers did so in a nefarious manner?
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Tyrannohotep: How did the OP get his hands on the full text of the article? All I've been able to dig up on Google are abstracts. Which is a shame, because this looks like a cool paper.
answer: illegal entry site Also note preprint, different title, same authors
You're European right? But you stay silent
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well the paper's been found so it's not fake. Great, glad that's settled. So back to the subject of the study before the mods show up.
Posts: 2508 | From: . | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: To those who can read the ancient Egyptian text…is this true? ... Was there a difference and adversarial events between Nubians and Egyptians? Some of the old guards on here like Sage? And Wally etc mentioned that there was no difference between Nubians and Egyptians
IIRC TTBOMK The founders of the state had physical features veering toward Ta Seti features compared to rank&file Badarians and Naqadans. I don't have how long it took to diminish.
Nubian Ta Seti used to extend to Edfu before state formation.
Old Kingdom warfare and trade biographies indicate the Egyptian State and the various Lower Nubian kingdoms were all seperate political entities.
There were epic battles between Egypt and Lower&Upper Nubian states from time to time.
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: We know Europeans lie and spin.
then stop reading their articles fool
Lioness ask why do I insist Europeans are liars and spin masters. Here is an example. See if you can spot the BS and spin. Hint! Check the time line
-------------------------- From Wiki
People also ask What happened to Muhammad in 610 CE? 610 C.E. According to Muslim belief, at the age of 40, Muhammad is visited by the angel Gabriel while on retreat in a cave near Mecca. The angel recites to him the first revelations of the Quran and informs him that he is God's prophet
Why did Muhammad leave Mecca and where did he go? The Islamic prophet Muhammad came to Medina following the migration of his followers in what is known as the Hijra (migration to Medina) in 622. He had been invited to Medina by city leaders to adjudicate disputes between clans from which the city suffered. He left Medina to return to and conquer Mecca in December 629.
---------------------------------- Residential Mobility and Dental Decoration in Early Medieval Spain: Results from the Eighth Century Site of Plaza del Castillo, Pamplona-Eleanna Prevedorou1
ABSTRACT
Excavations at Plaza del Castillo in Pamplona (northern Spain) revealed a large Islamic necropolis dating to the eighth century A.D., including the skeleton of an adult female showing intentional dental modification (PLA-159). While the practice of dental decoration was virtually absent in Medieval Spain, it is common in Africa and suggests that this individual was born in Africa and brought(slaves???) to Spain later in life. The historically documented occupation of Pamplona by Muslim groups from northern Africa between ca. 715 and
Among the types closest to the modifications observed in Plaza del Castillo are the ones reported for western Africa regions such as the Niger (Haour and Pearson, 2005:431), wherein the shape of the tooth was modified without affecting the occlusal surface. However, no parallel types have yet been found for the removal of the enamel up to the cervical area as observed
in individual PLA-159 (Fig. 3b). Documentation of the practice of dental decoration in the Iberian Peninsula is scarce. Dental modifications have been observed as part of post-mortem ritual in prehistoric Spain (Campillo et al., 2001). One case of an adult male of a possible sub-Saharan origin with intentional dental modificationis documented from a more recent Islamic cemetery (13th to 15th centuries A.D.) in Spain (Gonzalo et al., 2001). A number of examples of dental modification are reported in Portugal in later periods, associated with the trade of slaves,mostly unpublished. !!!!! Thus, the occurrence, as well as the typology of intentional dental modification at Plaza del Castillo suggest an African origin for PLA-159 and argue for the presence of first-generation immigrants in the cemetery.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
The time line do NOT support the popular belief about Muslim "invasion" in Iberia. I said so many times. Another lie by Europeans. These customs were indigenous to Iberia.
Anyways - back on topic.
Thanks Sage.
"Nubian Ta Seti used to extend to Edfu before state formation. "
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Good find, we've been saying this on this site for 10+ years, and its sad that despite the evidence this is just now being studied with any serious intent.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Quit the Euroeroticism Xyyman... Posts with "Europeans are *_Insert Negative Adjective_* will be removed completely I wont even try to salvage it...
Lioness stop baiting...
5 inane posts and an Illegal link removed //MODPosts: 1781 | From: New York | Registered: Jul 2016
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hey Lioness. I am trying to run down “Kanya Mia Chrisco Godde”. She references Keita a lot. What is her politics? 4Ws. Just curious but I came up empty. I know she is a professor at La Verne Ca
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Bottom line, any discussion of "Ancient Nubia" as a distinct geopolital entity in the Nile Valley is problematic to begin with.
Just like there were no French in Europe in 5,000 BC, neither were there any "Nubians" in the Nile Valley in 5,000 BC, 3,000 BC or even 2,000 BC. "Nubian" in the context of the ancient Nile Valley is a made up ethno-cultural entity created by European archaeologists/egyptologists. All populations along the Nile are related as "Nile Valley Africans" even with mixture. Claiming that "Nubians" as Nile Valley Africans are separate from Egyptians as Nile Valley Africans is the problem. They are all Nile Valley African populations and hence are more closely related to each other than any other population anywhere else.
To this day any discussion of so-called "Nubia" is a discussion of contradictions. And these papers are no different because they keep trying to flesh out a framework based on ideologies of racism from the past instead of throwing them out.
From the article above:
quote: Between 5,000 and 3,000 B.C., humans across Africa were migrating to the Nile’s lush banks as the Earth warmed and equatorial jungles transformed into the deserts they are today. “You cannot go 50 kilometers along the Nile River Valley without finding an important site because humans spent thousands of years here in the same place, from prehistoric to modern times,” Vincent Francigny, the director of the French Archeological Unit, tells me in his office in Sudan’s capital, Khartoum. Nearby his office, the White Nile from Uganda and the Blue Nile from Ethiopia unite into one river that flows through Nubia, enters Egypt and exits into the Mediterranean Sea.
How about Africans have been migrating along the Nile since the first humans existed in Africa? First contradiction.
quote: Roughly around 2,000 B.C., archaeologists find the first traces of the Nubian kingdom called Kush.
Second contradiction. Kerma preceded Kush by thousands of years and cultures in Northern Sudan existed prior to the Predynastic. Most of the ancient sites prior to the predynastic like Wadi Kubbaniya and other sites are in the regions close to Sudan if not in Sudan proper.
quote: Egyptians conquered parts of the Kushite Kingdom for a few hundred years, and around 1,000 B.C., Egyptians appear to have died, left, or mixed thoroughly with the local population. At 800 B.C., Kushite kings, also known as the black pharaohs, took over Egypt for a century — two cobras decorating the pharaohs’ crowns signify the unification of kingdoms. And somewhere around 300 A.D., the Kushite empire began to fade away.
Next contradiction. The AE actually annexed Lower Sudan as part of Egypt and declared that the main deity of the AE pantheon originated in Sudan: Amun at Gebel Barkal, which means that the AE acknowledged the roots of AE kingship originating in what is now Sudan.....
And on and on and on.
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Nice input. So they have the Chronology all wrong! That is why I asked for this to be vetted from the old guards. The history books is not my thing.
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
The Chronology isn't wrong, it is made up. George Reisner made up the concept of the ancient "Nubians" and was openly and blatantly racist about distinguishing them from Egyptians. His whole model for "Nubia" was based on "race" and distinguishing "Savage negroes" from "civilized Egyptians". The problem was that there was no monolithic entity in the ancient Nile Valley called "Nubia". No such geographic, ethnic, cultural and political entity existed prior to late Egyptian history (The Roman Era). That would make "Nubia" the oldest nation state on earth but no such thing existed.
Reisner used the term "A-group Nubian" to identify the populations in Upper Egypt and around Aswan based on pottery styles, not even skeletal remains. The racial characteristics were completely fabricated. However, the so-called "A-Group" were the precursors for and basis for the predynastic of AE. In Upper Egypt during the predynastic the town "Nubt" (another term for gold trading town) was one of the main centers for predynastic culture. It is now called "Naqada" based on the arabic name. "Nubt" is the closest thing to "Nubian" in ancient Egyptian language and it literally meant "golden" as an adjective. The gold trade is what made Egypt powerful and much of that gold originated in Upper Egypt and Lower Sudan, precisely in the areas of the A-Group. So the "golden culture" based on gold mining and trade in gold is the basis for the rise of the Egyptian culture and wealth and most of the gods and patterns of culture originated from there. These people know this which is why they made up "Nubia" as a way to segregate the Nile Valley into "superior" white/eurasian Egyptians and "savage negro Nubians".
And the whole idea of a timeline for ancient "Nubia" goes back to the racist George Reisner.
Modern Egyptology still upholds his racist models of "Nubia" even though they claim otherwise.
quote: Reisner died at Giza in Harvard Camp in 1942. In his final years, despite near total blindness, he continued working, dictating manuscripts to a secretary. By the end of his career, he had explored arguably the most famous archaeological site in the world (the Giza Pyramids), discovered thousands of artifacts and hundreds of artistic masterpieces, rewritten the history of Nubia and three millennia of Egypto–Nubian relations, and permanently altered the course of modern archaeology. He is buried in the American cemetery in Mari Girgis, Cairo.
Here is a recent pamphlet on "Nubia" from the Boston Museum of Fine Arts:
quote: For thousands of years, many peoples have settled along the Nile River from the Mediterranean coast to the interior of Africa. As one moves from the north to the south, one would observe that the physical features of these Nile dwellers change gradually. The variations are barely noticeable from one village to the next. But, over longer distances, one can see dif- ferences in skin color, facial features, and height and hear several different languages. This is as true today as it was thousands of years ago.
The peoples of Nubia are an indigenous African population. They have occupied the middle portion of the Nile Valley since at least 6000 B.C. and likely for much longer. The Greeks and Romans called all the territory south of Egypt by the Greek name Ethiopia, which meant "Land of the Burnt Faces." This described its people, who had dark brown or black skin. Even the name Sudan is an Arabic translation of the Greek name meaning "(Land of the) Blacks." According to the latest studies, modern-day Nubians are most likely the direct descendants of the ancient Nubians.
While both Egyptians and Nubians are indigenous African peoples, the ancient Egyptians represented themselves in their art differently from their southern neighbors. Egyptian artists used a red-brown paint for the skin color of Egyptian men, yellow for Egyptian women, and a dark brown or black for all Nubians. A painting from the tomb chamber of an Egyptian queen, in figure 8, shows her with black skin color, indicating that she was Nubian or of Nubian descent.
Characteristic clothing also distinguishes Nubians in Egyptian art. No- tice, for example, the long, beaded Nubian belt in the painting of a Nubi- an soldier on his tomb stela (gravestone) in figure 9. Nubians can also be identified by their hairstyles. For example, figure 1 0 shows a procession of four different races of mankind. The Nubians have short, curly hairstyles distinctive from those of the Egyptians. Some Nubian men dyed their hair red and adorned it with ostrich feathers. This hairstyle is depicted in the Egyptian tomb paintings in figures 7 and 10.
Then they turn around and start contradicting themselves:
quote: Prehistoric Nubia In early prehistoric times, nomadic cattle herders occupied most of (6000-3100 b.c.) north Africa, including northern Nubia. In southern Nubia, a very different and highly advanced culture developed, known today as the Khartoum Mesolithic. Remains of this eight-thousand-year-old culture have been found near Khartoum, the modern-day capital of the Sudan. It was closely related to other ancient cultures spread across north and central Africa.
The Khartoum Mesolithic people subsisted primarily by hunting and fishing. Their pottery, perhaps the oldest known in the world, is sophisti- cated and advanced. Unlike the early civilizations of Asia and the Near East, in Nubia the establishment of settlements and the production of pot- tery seem to have occurred before agriculture began.
The Neolithic Period (5000-3100 B.C.) showed considerable advances in Nubian civilization. This culture began creating human figurines, slate palettes for grinding cosmetics, and Black-topped red pottery.
They say the "Nubians" are older than "Egyptians" but somehow they don't put two and two together....
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The culture of the Nile Valley flowed from South to North. Making this artificial cultural entity called "Nubia" is designed to obfuscate and confuse people about this fact.
Earliest graves found in Sudan, not "Egypt":
quote: Prehistoric Burials in Ancient Egypt Paleolithic Burials
The oldest known skeleton in Ancient Egypt was discovered in a burial site referred to as Taramsa 1, close to the Temple of Hathor at Dendera. The body of an "anatomically modern" child was found which was dated to around 55,000 years ago (Pleistocene Age). The body was seated, with its legs bend to the left, leaning backwards in an east-west orientation. The head was looking up to the east, the left arm resting on the pelvis and the right arm behind the back. Although numerous blades, shards and flakes were also found in the grave, they are not thought to be burial gifts.
Nazlet Khater (an Upper Palaeolithic site near Tahata in Upper Egypt) is the site of the oldest known underground mine in Ancient Egypt. Close to the mine archaeologists discovered two graves tentatively dated to 30,000 – 35,000 BC. One grave was in a very poor state, but in the other the body was clearly placed on its back, knees bent, head tilted to face the west. The left arm rested on the pelvis, the right stretched along the body. A bifacially shaped axe had been carefully placed at the bottom of the grave close to the head.
Qadan burials dating to between 14,000 and 12,000 (late Paleolithic) have been excavated at Gebel Sahaba (near Wadi Halfa in Lower Nubia). Bodies, a large number of which showed signs of violence and many of whom were buried in mass graves, were semi-contracted (where the body is placed in a foetal position) on their left sides with heads facing east. They were interred in pits covered with large sandstone slabs. Near contemporary burials at Wadi Tuskka (north of Abu Simbel) were marked by the placement of cattle skulls.
Note the bolded part. There was no Egypt in 14,000 BC. So these burials weren't "Egyptian" and if anything they were in the areas called "Nubian".....
Not to mention:
quote: In the process of reconstructing the evolution of these societies, a great contribution has been provided by another important group of sites located just north of the Sudanese-Egyptian border, in the Western Desert of Egypt, 100 km west of the II Cataract: the areas of Nabta playa and Kiseiba, thoroughly investigated by the Combined Prehistoric Expedition starting in the 1980s (Wendorf et al. 1980, 1984; Wendorf and Associates 2001). During the Early-Middle Holocene, these areas gravitated toward the Khartoum Variant cultural sphere (Gatto 2002, 2006; Usai 2004, 2005, 2008a), and they more or less correspond to the northernmost zone of the spread of the pottery-bearing hunter-gatherer-fishers of the Nile valley. Beyond this border a different situation has been described (Vermeersch 1978; Vermeersch et al. 2015).
Currently, the beginning of the Mesolithic can be pushed back to ~9000 BC (Honegger 2012, 2013), and these oldest phases have been recognized at Nabta/Kiseiba and Kerma areas. Meanwhile, the oldest phase recorded in central Sudan, at Al Khiday, dates to about ~7000 BC. Along the Nile stretch separating these two regions, sites where similar ancient dates have been recorded are located at the Nile-Atbara confluence (Haaland and Magi 1995) and north of Khartoum, at Sarourab (Khabir 1987). Unfortunately, these ancient dates are not associated with discrete archaeological deposits or contexts (Salvatori 2012; Usai 2014).
The sites of the Kerma area, Al Khiday and Nabta/Kiseiba, bear strong similarities in settlement structure and organization. Moreover, and more relevant, the establishment of a village with organized internal spaces coincides chronologically to roughly 7000 BC. At Nabta Playa and Al Khiday the village shows a similar plan with semisubterranean huts and pits. At Al Khiday, however, the functional areas with pits seem more complex, and pits with different fills corresponding to different functions are located in separate zones. At Al Khiday 2 most pits were filled with ash or mixed ash-sand deposits with burned stones and relevant amount of archaeological material; more rarely these pits have darker sandy-clay deposits and are rich in articulated faunal remains. Conversely, the last pit typology is very common at Al Khiday 2B, where the fill becomes more clayish and faunal remains in anatomical connections are the most common find. These numerous features, presently under analytical study for chemical, mineral, and microbotanical content tracing, suggest that the group occupied the area almost continuously. Some break in this continuity may have caused the physical and mnemonic destruction of spatial organization, and this may have caused the observed stratigraphic situation, with pits cutting each other. A small chronological difference could be established by pottery analysis, a difference that, unfortunately, cannot as easily be established with a wide series of radiocarbon dates based on terrestrial shells, mainly of the Pila species.
This evidence seems to indicate a more sedentary lifestyle in comparison with the earliest occupation phase. The more ancient levels recorded at Al Khiday are characterized by more ephemeral living structures, with post-holes and fireplaces in low depressions. A similar situation is recorded at Nabta/Kiseiba, while for the Kerma region it is not yet possible to measure any such change.
The earliest sites of settlement and human activity along the Nile are all in areas between Upper Egypt and Lower Sudan. Precisely the areas of the so-called "Nubians". Yet none of these studies of "Nubia" seem to point this out, because most of these "Nubian" archaeological remains are based on arbitrary and broken up archaeological time periods that were made up by Reisner, such as "A-Group" and "C-Group". There is a long gap in the archaeological record between the "A-Group" and "C-Group" yet they are still called "Nubians". Why if there is such a long gap and differences between the two periods in terms of artifacts? And if they can lump those together why not lump in the older settlements from the same region as Nubian as well? All an arbitrary made up scheme to distort the facts rather than elucidate.
In fact, contrary to the opinions of many, the site at Jebel Sahaba is still used to prop up racist fantasies about the ancient Nile Valley to this very day.
quote: Now British Museum scientists are planning to learn more about the victims themselves – everything from gender to disease and from diet to age at death. The discovery of dozens of previously undetected arrow impact marks and flint arrow fragments suggests that the majority of the individuals – men, women and children – in the Jebel Sahaba cemetery were killed by enemy archers, and then buried by their own people. What’s more, the new research demonstrates that the attacks – in effect a prolonged low-level war – took place over many months or years.
Parallel research over recent years has also been shedding new light as to who, in ethnic and racial terms, these victims were.
Why? Why is there a mystery about the "ethnic/racial" identity of 13 thousand year old remains in Africa? Seriously?
quote: Work carried out at Liverpool John Moores University, the University of Alaska and New Orleans’ Tulane University indicates that they were part of the general sub-Saharan originating population – the ancestors of modern Black Africans.
What else would you expect? Why are they making it seem as if ancient burials in Africa would be anything other than black Africans.
quote: The identity of their killers is however less easy to determine. But it is conceivable that they were people from a totally different racial and ethnic group – part of a North African/ Levantine/European people who lived around much of the Mediterranean Basin.
Meaning this is all bull sh*t. They are speculating and making up a "racial" difference between those that died and those that killed them with NO EVIDENCE. So they are pushing this racial view of history, not the facts on the ground. And this is why they created "ancient Nubia".
quote: The two groups – although both part of our species, Homo sapiens – would have looked quite different from each other and were also almost certainly different culturally and linguistically. The sub-Saharan originating group had long limbs, relatively short torsos and projecting upper and lower jaws along with rounded foreheads and broad noses, while the North African/Levantine/European originating group had shorter limbs, longer torsos and flatter faces. Both groups were very muscular and strongly built.
What remains are they referring to. At this point this is all just them putting European populations in Africa with no real evidence and promoting "race war". Why are no other ancient cemetaries anywhere else on earth labeled as "race war" except this one? Ooh, this is the Nile Valley and they have to put Europeans in there as the basis for the first civilization on the planet. Of course it couldn't be the indigenous black folks.
quote: Certainly the northern Sudan area was a major ethnic interface between these two different groups at around this period. Indeed the remains of the North African/Levantine/European originating population group has even been found 200 miles south of Jebel Sahaba, thus suggesting that the arrow victims were slaughtered in an area where both populations operated.
What’s more, the period in which they perished so violently was one of huge competition for resources – for they appear to have been killed during a severe climatic downturn in which many water sources dried up, especially in summer time.
So nothing really has changed since the time of George Reisner.
There has never been a "racial" difference between populations in Upper Egypt and Lower Sudan. This is all made up bull sh*t promoted by archaeologists.
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DD'eDeN: Doug M. : "And this is why they created "ancient Nubia" "
---
Maybe you are correct, I don't know.
I do have a serious enquiry:
Between Nubia and Libya lies Egypt.
I don't know if Egypt was ever called
Jyu.bia or Jyu.mbdia or Llu.bdia
aE.gyp(t)ia (Hellene Greek)
Judea Ha-Yudia -> Yahudi ? (in Hebrew)
KMT (in Anc. Egyptian per Egyptologists))
"(ae)jyumbdia" is how I think it was spoken, with dialect variances eg. jubia/llubya/Ljublya {compare to Ljubljana, Slovenia).
Does anyone know if that fits any known reference to 'Egypt'?
It would IMO match Gebt, Aegiptos, KeMeT but not Mizraim.
George Reisners writings are publically available for folks to read. And keep in mind most writings on Egypt and Africa during the 19th and 20th century was openly racist.....
Here is another paper which summarizes the creation of "Nubia" in an archaeological context:
quote: Today, ‘Nubia’ is generally used to refer to the area (both in the past and present) in Northeast Africa where Nubian languages are currently spoken (Shinnie 1996), the region from just north of the 1 st Cataract of the Nile in Egypt to south of the 3 rd Cataract in Sudan. However, recent archaeological research has located Nubian sites associated with the Kerma culture in the 4 th and 5 th Cataract areas as well (Smith & Herbst 2008; Welsby 2007). Some researchers use ‘Nubia’ simply as a geographic name, rather than as an indication of ethnicity or language (Bianchi 2004; Edwards 2004; O’Connor 1993). Although people have lived in this region as far back as 13,000 BC, the word ‘Nubian’ in reference to an area’s name does not appear until the 3 rd century BC (O’Connor 1993 citing Wenig 1980). In Christian times (AD 540-1500), inhabitants of the region spoke Nubian languages, though it is thought that the language can be traced back as far as the Egyptian Middle Kingdom (2050-1650 BC; Behrens 1981; O’Connor 1993; Rilly 2007).
The etymology of the word ‘Nubia’ is disputed (O’Connor 1993). Popular opinion links it to the ancient Egyptian noun, ‘ nebu ’, meaning gold (Bianchi 2004), given that Nubia was the source for gold in ancient Egypt (Adams 1977). Bronze Age Egyptians called Nubians, Nehasyu, referring to the nomads of the region, riverine peoples, and those living by the Red Sea Coast (O’Connor 1993). It is also proposed that the term derives from a Nuba Hills word for slave (Th ewall & Schadeberg 1983). Although it was originally suggested that the place, Yam, in Egyptian texts referred to Nubia, archaeologists have recently discovered an inscrip- tion that locates it further west (Clayton et al. 2008). Beginning in the Middle Kingdom, Egyptian texts call this area Kush, although the term was originally applied to Upper Nubia only. By the 1 st millennium BC, Kush was the preferred name for all of Nubia in Egyptian, Assyrian, Persian, and Hebrew languages (O’Connor 1993).
Biased perspectives on Nile Valley populations
Scholars traditionally viewed Nubia from an Egyptian viewpoint wherein Nubia is eclipsed by the well-known history of Egypt and is seen as marginal and controlled by Egypt, a perspec-tive that underestimates Nubia as an active player in regional politics (Adams 1977; Hafsaas- Tsakos 2009; Smith 2003). The portrayal of ancient Nubians by contemporary Egyptians in texts and artistic representations supported these ideas; Nubians were often depicted as simple people living in modestly built villages (O’Connor 1993). When Nubian archaeological sites began to be excavated in the late 19 th and early 20 th centuries, many of the initial interpreta- tions were colored by racist views common during that time (Bernal 1987). Reisner (1923a) originally attributed the grand architecture and material remains uncovered at Kerma, as well as at A-Group sites, to Egyptians (Török 2009), hypothesizing that local ‘black’ culture could not have been responsible for the scale and grandeur of the habitation sites, deff ufas (large mud brick buildings) and tumulus cemeteries. He suggested that the buildings were actually Egyptian trading posts and forts, the headquarters of Egyptian governors who were buried in the cemeteries. Questioned by several researchers (e.g., Batrawi 1946; Hintze 1964; Junker 1921), the Kerman remains were eventually recognized to be entirely Nubian (except for some traded statues). However, the common view of Egyptians as the ‘civilizers’ of Nubians was also maintained in anatomical research (e.g., Smith & Derry 1910a, 1910b), which linked cultural change with the infl ux of new peoples and claimed population replacement as well as cultural decline caused by the infl uence of the ‘negroid’ element. These studies, along with many sources during this period that asserted that Egyptians were white, used primitive and highly subjective methods often relying on selective observations, and found material confi rmation of whatever historical theories they wished to believe (Adams 1977; Carlson & Van Gerven 1979; Diop 1981). Shared by nearly all early students of Nubian history, these biased ideas drastically affected Egyptological views of Nubia (Sherif 1981) and survived long after the destruction of their empirical foundation (Adams 1977).
A new analysis interpreting Nilotic relationships and peopling of the Nile Valley – K Godde July 2018
Abstract The process of the peopling of the Nile Valley likely shaped the population structure and early biological similarity of Egyptians and Nubians. As others have noted, affinity among Nilotic populations was due to an aggregation of events, including environmental, linguistic, and sociopolitical changes over a great deal of time. This study seeks to evaluate the relationships of Nubian and Egyptian groups in the context of the original peopling event. Cranial nonmetric traits from 18 Nubian and Egyptian samples, spanning Lower Egypt to Lower Nubia and approximately 7400 years, were analyzed using Mahalanobis D2 as a measure of biological distance. A principal coordinates analysis and spatial-temporal model were applied to these data. The results reveal temporal and spatial patterning consistent with documented events in Egyptian and Nubian population history. Moreover, the Mesolithic Nubian sample clustered with later Nubian and Egyptian samples, indicating that events prior to the Mesolithic were important in shaping the later genetic patterning of the Nubian population. Later contact through the establishment of the Egyptian fort at Buhen, Kerma’s position as a strategic trade center along the Nile, and Egyptian colonization at Tombos **maintained **genetic similarity among the populations.
Old News. P.K. Manansala told us all thisyears ago! LOL
-------------------- Mahirap gisingin ang nagtutulog-tulugan. Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks for the Kudos. When I was younger many of the writings from the 60s and 70s and on back were still verging on old racist models. It is hard for me to forget that. Younger folks may not have this frame of reference.
Heck, I remember cartoons and TV shows with blatant racist stereotypes were still being shown (3 Stooges, The Little Rascals, Tarzan etc)....
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
In my mind, the only true "Nubians" are the speakers of Nubian languages, such as the Nobatae, Makurians, or modern Nubians. And these would have become more prominent in the Middle Nile region after the collapse of Kush in the 4th century AD:
It's possible that the Kushite language shared a common Nilo-Saharan linguistic heritage with the Nubian family, but otherwise I believe the people of Kush were a separate ethnic group from the ancestors of modern Nubians. The people of Wawat (aka the C-Group), Medjay, Yam, and maybe Ta-Seti (aka the A-Group) likewise were their own nationalities. And yet they all get lumped into the "Nubian" identity simply because they inhabited the Middle Nile Valley.
quote:Originally posted by Tyrannohotep: [QB] In my mind, the only true "Nubians" are the speakers of Nubian languages
According to Doug Nile Valley Africans are one people not a split created by Europeans that they call "Egyptians" and "non-Egyptians i.e. "Nubians"
Therefore we should not be discussing articles about "Nubians" because to do so is to support this false premise, false division of Nile Valley Africans
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Quit trying to use other posters' statements as your strawdolls. If you have nothing of significance perhaps you should stay quiet.
Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I was going to post this before but assumed folks would get it. The point here is that populations in Africa are not homogeneous. African diversity is greater than any other place on earth. Within any part of Africa there are variations in physical features. In Kenya you have different features among the populations there and various ethnic groups. In Sudan you have the same thing, in Congo you have it and same thing everywhere else. The Nile Valley was no different than any other part of Africa in that sense. "Nubians" were not a different "race" from other Nile Valley Africans just like the Dinka aren't a different race from modern Beja. So, the idea of "Nubia" as a "racial" distinction is the problem.
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
yes, I'm the only one in the thread who got it
quote:Originally posted by Doug M: George Reisner made up the concept of the ancient "Nubians" and was openly and blatantly racist about distinguishing them from Egyptians. His whole model for "Nubia" was based on "race" and distinguishing "Savage negroes" from "civilized Egyptians". The problem was that there was no monolithic entity in the ancient Nile Valley called "Nubia".
Therefore we should not be discussing these articles using the word "Nubian" and instead point out these articles are built on a false premise "Nubian"
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Question? Recent DNA studies point to Kerma Culture and C group both being North African/Libyan/Egyptian or clustering with Egyptian/NA/Libyan. How does that contradict Reisner? Or does it confirm Reisner's assumption of a small Dynastic race ruling over a large South Sudanese/ "negro" /Sub Saharan population that would later develop into Kush?
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Yatunde Lisa: Question? Recent DNA studies point to Kerma Culture and C group both being North African/Libyan/Egyptian or clustering with Egyptian/NA/Libyan. How does that contradict Reisner? Or does it confirm Reisner's assumption of a small Dynastic race ruling over a large South Sudanese/ "negro" /Sub Saharan population that would later develop into Kush?
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
@ Doug
If you mean me I was talking Nubia as a regional geography not race anthropology. That's why I mentioned the Red Sea populations who represent one general type of Nubian usually overlooked (except for that wooden scale model archer regiment).
African diversity, not race, not only differentiates Nubians from Egyptians but various Nubians from each other.
posted
Nubia is a name that came into use in the Roman period
The name Nubian appears in a variety of forms in ancient and mediaeval texts; Nubae, Nobades, Nobates, Annoubades,. Noba, Nouba and so on
Posts: 42919 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
This finding is consistent with the Coptic ancestral component that Dobon et al. (2015) observed to be the defining element among Egyptian Copts and other Afro-Asiatic speakers in the Nile Valley and Ethiopia, as well as among many present-day Nubians. Hodgson et al. (2014) found an analogous West Eurasian ancestral component among Afro-Asiatic speakers in the Horn region, with a frequency peak among ethnic Somalis. Since it is unlikely that there was a population replacement among Nubians in the intervening centuries after the medieval Christian period, we can safely assume that the Coptic/Ethio-Somali ancestral component that defines modern Nubians is the same West Eurasian-affiliated ancestral component that defines the KulR17 specimen from Kulubnarti.
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Egypt is a name invented by the French. It entered English in the 16th century.
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: Yatunde Lisa is trying to re-establish "Nubia" as a valid term
No I am not. What I am asking is what "ethnicity" and or DNA profile or DNA clustering would A group & C group fall into?
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |