Marcus Opellius Macrinus (ca. 165 – June 218), commonly known as Macrinus, was Roman Emperor from 217 to 218. Macrinus was of Berber descent and the first emperor to become so without membership in the senatorial class
Born in Caesarea (modern Cherchell, Algeria) in the Roman province of Mauretania to an equestrian family, Macrinus received an education which allowed him to ascend to the Roman political class. Over the years he earned a reputation as a skilled lawyer.
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: ^^ Fakes as usual.
Look at the coinage issued by the black King himself in his lifetime...
Query for Lyinass:
Was Macrinus born in Algeria North Africa?
Was he a Numidian?
Was he Muurish?
Was he a Roman Emperor?
Can you describe him as Romano-Muurish?
Until now, have you ever heard of Emp. Macrinus?
I am waiting....
True African!
IN FRENCH: Macrin (Marcus Opellius Macrinus) était Africain, comme Sévère, et originaire de Cæsarea, le Cherchell de notre colonie algérienne. Il eut d’humbles commencements.
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Check out this picture of Bro Aristobolus, first century apostle who christianized the British Isle. First Bishop of Britain, black Jew, black Christian, and Cypriot scholar, in short a Muur of Europe, Nigri Latini...
Yes, we were the first christians too!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Jari quote: Also I find it funny how the Romans are supposed to be black Africans, but we have the Pantheon in Paris, Palladian Motif in England, a Roman Bath in Britian, Baroque in Austria, Romanesque in France, Germany, and The British Isles..
Poor Uneducated Self Hating Negros don't realize how European and Anti-African Rome is and was..LOL
He, he, But Jari - didn't you tell us that YOU were Black?
Mieky I did not miss that too!
The young gwoat just destroyed himself.
Claiming to be black when you are pink is the lowest form of inferiority complex.
You see, when you burst their Roman fantasy bubble, the pinks lose it completely. Because that is their last false prop.
Lion!
LOL, Bitch only in your little mind did I get destroyed by Mike's Red Herring..
LOL, Roman Fantasy, Rome was what it was a Multi Ethnic Empire Ruled by White Europeans, were there black Roman citiens Yes, but few made it to Emperor status and you self hating Rusty black ass would have been calling the Blue Eyed albino Emperor Agustus Massa back then..little Bitch boy like you would probably lick the sand off his Sandals and Feet.
^^^^ Behold the Only Black Roman Emperor with his Albino Wife and Child...
Get back to the basement and put the crack pipe down Child..
Are you sure of that pink gwoat? Was Severus the only black Emperor of Rome? Check again, before you get super-embarrassed!
This morning, Lioness declared that the Severan dynasty was "pink-white" Do you want to consult with her before I begin dealing out the blows?
Lion!
So Geri Geri Judass,
Was Severus the only "black" emperor of Rome?
I will not stop until you call me "Uncle.."
Lion! Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: SEPTIMUS SEVERERUS (sic)
blah blah baaa...
The Black Emperors of Rome
Septimius Severus:
Founder of the African dynasty of Roman emperors, b. at Leptis Magna in Africa, 11 April, 146; d. at York, England, 4 February, 211. Severus came from a family that had become Roman citizens. In his career as an official at Rome and in the provinces he had been favored by the Emperor Marcus Aurelius. In the reign of Commodus he was appointed legate of the fourth legion on the Euphrates; this gave him the opportunity to become acquainted with affairs in the East. He married Julia Domna, a member of a priestly family of Emesa, who was the mother of Caracalla and Geta.
Marcus Opellius Macrinus (ca. 165 – June 218), commonly known as Macrinus, was Roman Emperor from 217 to 218. Macrinus was of Berber descent and the first emperor to become so without membership in the senatorial class
Born in Caesarea (modern Cherchell, Algeria) in the Roman province of Mauretania to an equestrian family, Macrinus received an education which allowed him to ascend to the Roman political class. Over the years he earned a reputation as a skilled lawyer.
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Lion - please excuse my interference in your thread. But it appears that what we logically assumed to be true, IS true. The Hebrews were Black people, Jesus as a Hebrew was also Black, so logically the people who were originally spreading Jesus' words were also Black.
It appears this is demonstrable in Wales. Might I suggest that you start a separate thread to pursue this?
OK next project we are doing will be on the Muurs of Ireland, Scotland and Wales...
It is lots of work, but then evidence is there.
I mentioned the St of Welsh Orthodox Church because they were linked up with the centre in Eastern Rome and Anatolia the monasticism of Egypt and Nubia.
Maybe even a book... but first, we first deal with the skeptics and ignoramuses of Egypt Search...
They are such a joy tearing through...
-------------------- Lionz Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
so Iron, to sum up, Rome was basically black with a small smattering of whites, correct? I await your wisdom
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: so Iron, to sum up, Rome was basically black with a small smattering of whites, correct? I await your wisdom
Rome was originally a plantation colony of Carthaginian black Lords owned largely by Baarka family and the Nigrinus family of Carthage.
It is true that the governors, freemen and the slaves of Rome rebelled against Carthage and won its independence in the two famous Punic wars. Which is why you find so many North African Roman Emperors, and high officials in Roman empire.
Free Romans were divided into Patricans and Freemen and Plebians. There was a huge concentration of Muurish people in the Patrician class as well as freemen.
The latins were mostly plebians they could pass for paler skin Pakistanis or Indians; You still see some today...
Thus you see that Roman was a collection of black and browns the Muurs, brunnettes, and Nigritaes.
The so-called whites, aka the pink-reds goths and slavics came in later over the course of the one thousand years of Rome's existence
The were the slaves, the preregrines, the harlots, and the plebians of Rome
When they increased sufficiently in number they took over the empire.
Seen?....
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: Rome was originally a plantation colony of Carthaginian black Lords owned largely by Baarka family and the Nigrinus family of Carthage.
Iron at what were the approximate years, the time period when Rome was founded ?
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
Messene: In the early 5th century BC, Anaxilas of Rhegium renamed it Messene in honour of the Greek city Messene. The city was sacked in 397 BC by the Carthaginians... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messina
Marsala: Marsala occupies the site of Lilybaeum, the principal stronghold of the Carthaginians in Sicily, founded by Himilco in 396 BC after the abandonment of Motya. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsala
Cagliari: It passed with the rest of the island first to the control of Carthage and then to Rome in 238 BC when the Romans defeated the Carthaginians. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cagliari
And hundreds of other cities across Europe, into Ireland and Scotland, Illyria, Caucasus, name it...
Infact, the name Europa, is the name of a Phoenician/African Muurish Goddess...
The land of Europe is named after a black woman.... Europa who was kidnapped by Zeus..
Honey, any more questions?
Lion!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
The Etruscans the overlords of the latins and surrounding tribes, who gave Rome its civilization and culture was undeniably a black African people allied and connected with the Cartheginians. They were sea-faring like the Catheginians and had ancient ties and links with Phoenicia, Anatolia, Syria and Egypt:
Etruscans of Italy
You get the idea, darling?
Black ancient Romans! Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: Rome was originally a plantation colony of Carthaginian black Lords owned largely by Baarka family and the Nigrinus family of Carthage.
Iron at what were the approximate years, the time period when Rome was founded ?
Etruscan/Cartheginian Muurs
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
No sweetie, he is white I told you we are the first whites!
so some Etruscans were whites, were they of Carthaginian background?
Well darling, your eyes must be seeing this white nigga from Carthage Africa... LOL!!!
What makes you think he is white? His dark skin?
Or his wooly hair? Real hot-muurish curls?
Or is it the albinos with him...?
I asked you earlier about the figure on the left with the blond curly hair and pale skin. This would indicate that some of the Etruscans were white in a period far prior to the goths.
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
No sweetie, he is white I told you we are the first whites!
so some Etruscans were whites, were they of Carthaginian background?
Well darling, your eyes must be seeing this white nigga from Carthage Africa... LOL!!!
What makes you think he is white? His dark skin?
Or his wooly hair? Real hot-muurish curls?
Or is it the albinos with him...?
I asked you earlier about the figure on the left with the blond curly hair and pale skin. This would indicate that some of the Etruscans were white in a period far prior to the goths.
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: so Iron, to sum up, Rome was basically black with a small smattering of whites, correct? I await your wisdom
Borrow some wisdom from your schizoprenic half... Your alter ego already knows the answer.
quote:Originally posted by the lioness:
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: Rome was originally a plantation colony of Carthaginian black Lords owned largely by Baarka family and the Nigrinus family of Carthage.
Iron at what were the approximate years, the time period when Rome was founded ?
They were there waaaay before 1200BC
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: so Iron, to sum up, Rome was basically black with a small smattering of whites, correct? I await your wisdom
Rome was originally a plantation colony of Carthaginian black Lords owned largely by Baarka family and the Nigrinus family of Carthage.
It is true that the governors, freemen and the slaves of Rome rebelled against Carthage and won its independence in the two famous Punic wars. Which is why you find so many North African Roman Emperors, and high officials in Roman empire.
Free Romans were divided into Patricans and Freemen and Plebians. There was a huge concentration of Muurish people in the Patrician class as well as freemen.
The latins were mostly plebians they could pass for paler skin Pakistanis or Indians; You still see some today...
Thus you see that Roman was a collection of black and browns the Muurs, brunnettes, and Nigritaes.
The so-called whites, aka the pink-reds goths and slavics came in later over the course of the one thousand years of Rome's existence
The were the slaves, the preregrines, the harlots, and the plebians of Rome
When they increased sufficiently in number they took over the empire.
Seen?....
Read Lioness...
It is good to read, before blattering irrelevancies.....
Etruscans, Carthagenians, Nigri-Latinis, were all Muurs, those you would call Black Africans of today....
They were in Italy for millenia...
They founded Rome... the rooted families. Patricians....
Yet Rome was always multi-ethnic.
There were also Greeks, Turanians, Scythians etc.
Those were the peregrines, immigrants, slaves, workers, slavics, and ...prostitues...
Why do you pretend that you cannot understand this basic fact?
Is it that something is not connecting?
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: I asked you earlier about the figure on the left with the blond curly hair and pale skin. This would indicate that some of the Etruscans were white in a period far prior to the goths.
Lioness my dear - far be it from me to gloat; but I seem to detect a note of resignation. Could it be that the weight of evidence is starting to wear you down?
Buck-up sweet troll, there must be any number of asinine questions and comments still at your disposal.
Besides, you are made of sterner stuff than that. Albinos have carried out genocides that are still legendary, even today.
At the culmination of Caesar's war with Vercingetorix, and the Gauls surrender - It is estimated that one million persons died in the wars and another million was sold into slavery, draining Gaul of approximately one third of the entire population. At the end, Caesar had effected an unprecedented genocide.
With that proud Albino history, will you now be defeated by simple truth? Since when does a proud Albino pay even the slightest attention to truth? So buck-up old girl, find a new lie and move on.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
The so-called whites, aka the pink-reds goths and slavics came in later over the course of the one thousand years of Rome's existence
The were the slaves, the preregrines, the harlots, and the plebians of Rome
When they increased sufficiently in number they took over the empire.
It is good to read, before blattering irrelevancies.....
Etruscans, Carthagenians, Nigri-Latinis, were all Muurs, those you would call Black Africans of today....
They were in Italy for millenia...
They founded Rome... the rooted families. Patricians....
Yet Rome was always multi-ethnic.
There were also Greeks, Turanians, Scythians etc.
Those were the peregrines, immigrants, slaves, workers, slavics, and ...prostitues...
Iron, are both people pictured above Etruscans? You mentioned white goths and slavics who came in later but the painting above is much earlier than this painting. So who is the person on the left?
The so-called whites, aka the pink-reds goths and slavics came in later over the course of the one thousand years of Rome's existence
The were the slaves, the preregrines, the harlots, and the plebians of Rome
When they increased sufficiently in number they took over the empire.
It is good to read, before blattering irrelevancies.....
Etruscans, Carthagenians, Nigri-Latinis, were all Muurs, those you would call Black Africans of today....
They were in Italy for millenia...
They founded Rome... the rooted families. Patricians....
Yet Rome was always multi-ethnic.
There were also Greeks, Turanians, Scythians etc.
Those were the peregrines, immigrants, slaves, workers, slavics, and ...prostitues...
Iron, are both people pictured above Etruscans? You mentioned white goths and slavics who came in later but the painting above is much earlier than this painting. So who is the person on the left?
Who are those black-brown curly haired muurish Etruscans in your fresco?
Where were your pink-albino ancestors at this time?
Where is your evidence?
quote:Originally posted by IronLion:
the blond on the left
You mean the servant girl who gets fuched from time to time by her Etruscan master?
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by IronLion:
What year is the painting you are referencing?
Who are those black-brown curly haired muurish Etruscans in your fresco?
Where were your pink-albino ancestors at this time?
Where is your evidence?
quote:Originally posted by IronLion:
the blond on the left
You mean the servant girl who gets fuched from time to time by her Etruscan master?
what is the nationality of the blond haired person on the left?
It's a reasonable question. If your ideas are correct then it should be no problem to answer this question. You are the one that posted this picture in the first place.
The fact that you don't seem to want to answer this simple question makes all what you said before seem less credible, not just to me but anyone else reading this thread.
Also the person on the left in this other picture you posted below:
This dated approximately 510 BC. The person on the left appears to be white. That seems certain, would you agree? Where did the person come from? Just give us a straightforward answer of guess and stop playing games, thank you
Posts: 42921 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic