quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric: Romans would have probably been swarthier than Gauls or Norsemen, as are modern Italians, but they were still light-skinned enough to be classified as White. The overwhelming majority of their own artwork attests to this.
Why are you hellbent on claiming every major civilization in history as Black? Not only is it disrespectful and racist towards non-Blacks, it also makes the history of civilization boringly monochromatic. I would rather the architects of civilization be of every possible skin color than all White, all Black, or whatever. It adds some diversity.
I'm waiting too. Or did you just pull that from your butt?
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
they look like exactly the same person. the only difference is the one on the left looks like he put on a few pounds at some point. The mouth nose and eyes are exactly the same, thank you Mike.
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Truthcentric: Romans would have probably been swarthier than Gauls or Norsemen, as are modern Italians, but they were still light-skinned enough to be classified as White. The overwhelming majority of their own artwork attests to this.
Why are you hellbent on claiming every major civilization in history as Black? Not only is it disrespectful and racist towards non-Blacks, it also makes the history of civilization boringly monochromatic. I would rather the architects of civilization be of every possible skin color than all White, all Black, or whatever. It adds some diversity.
I'm waiting too. Or did you just pull that from your butt?
As Caucasians kept coming in, Rome soon became a large city, similar to the powerful cities of southern Etruria, and it had also become predominately Caucasian. Accordingly, it was a Caucasian uprising that drove the Etruscans from Rome in 509 B.C.
Mike how can you show your face here? Your credibility is shot.
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
As Caucasians kept coming in, Rome soon became a large city, similar to the powerful cities of southern Etruria, and it had also become predominately Caucasian. Accordingly, it was a Caucasian uprising that drove the Etruscans from Rome in 509 B.C.
Mike how can you show your face here? Your credibility is shot.
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
the point is that to say Rome was predominantly Caucasian after 509 B.C. is completely opposite of what Ironedlion is saying. He says that there were no Caucasians or people mixed with Caucasians until after 400 AD, much less that Rome was majority Caucasian any time prior to 476 AD. I have to explain this?
As Caucasians kept coming in, Rome soon became a large city, similar to the powerful cities of southern Etruria, and it had also become predominately Caucasian. Accordingly, it was a Caucasian uprising that drove the Etruscans from Rome in 509 B.C.
the point is that to say Rome was predominantly Caucasian after 509 B.C. is completely opposite of what Ironedlion is saying. He says that there were no Caucasians or people mixed with Caucasians until after 400 AD, much less that Rome was majority Caucasian any time prior to 476 AD. I have to explain this?
quote:
I knew you were hopeless, But you are in a worse shape than I had imagined.
You not only cannot write well.. you certainly cannot read well.
READ THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED and MAKE UP YOUR MIND!
Stop complaining, either debunk the evidence or accept it!
So far, you have failed woefully with those spams of "hot fake Romano-Muurish curls"
Jeeeezeee, Bytch, put up or shut up! Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
oh this guy is some kind of multiracial Moor. ok. I have no argument. he's a brotherman
better quality photo. As you know wearing beards is not an African tradition unless Islam influenced. See how the photo I paste actually shows the green colors? Inevitably poorer quality photos get chosen because they have distorted contrast which makes the item look darker than they actually are, tricknology.
damn these guys are actually even darker than that big dick guy, I wonder if their dicks are as big Sicilian cops a feel of Neapolitan
If someone were to make a portrait of him in stone you would say he's black.
That's why no one takes your clowning seriously.
Although there are people who have ambiguous facial features between African and Caucasians there are many Caucasians who do not look ambiguous they look most definitely European.
You have a complete inability to sense that. ....forget about the hair, if you can't sense that Europeans, not Africans match the features and forehead of this portrait of Augustus you have a learning disability.
It is clear as day, not even slightly ambiguous.
LOL!
The natural and straight animal hair of Justin Timberlake when he is not going to a hair dresser. No hope for lyingass, can you see his real animal hair now. An albino with curly hair was not yet born.
Now Lyinass
Name me the gene that causes curly hair in Albinos? Go ahead dunce, name it?
The one that causes animal hair in Albinos is called THADA. I gave that you you already.
The one that causes pink skin is called defective OCA.
The one that causes coloured eyes and coloured hair is called MC1R.
What is the name of the gene that causes curly hair in Albino Europeans, if any?
Do you use tanning lotions like all Albinos do or do you use BLEACHING CREAM like the Roman women?
Stop playing games and start debatiing!
Lion!
Dont forget this lesson!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
Name me the gene that causes curly hair in Albinos?
I don't know about albinos, but hair genetics in modern Europeans is discussed below. The study mentioned discusses straight hair in Europeans and it's variants wavy and curly within Europeans. The gene is called the Trichohyalin gene (TCHH).
Australian scientists have identified the gene that strongly influences whether you have curly hair.
The trichohyalin gene has long been known to play some role in the development of the hair follicle.
Now the researchers at the Queensland Institute of Medical Research (QIMR) have found that it is the main gene responsible for creating curls.
Their study appears in the latest edition of the American Journal of Human Genetics .
Head of the QIMR Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory and co-author of the research, Professor Nick Martin says that it is variation in this gene that determines the straightness or curliness of hair. Evolutionary trait
Japanese research has previously found the genetic variations for the thick, straight hair that is predominant in Asian populations.
The differences in the EDAR and FGFR2 genes were identified last year and are thought to have occurred as part of the evolution of Asian populations following their prehistoric divergence from Europeans.
Martin and colleague Dr Sarah Medland sought to find a similar variation responsible for curly hair in those of European descent. It is known that 45% of European people have straight hair, 40% have wavy hair and 15% have curly hair.
They had previously established the heritability of curly hair, finding there was as much as a 90% chance of it being an inherited trait.
In the most recent work, researchers at the QIMR laboratory analysed data collected from a study of 5000 twins in Australia over a 30 year period.
"We had large amounts of information on a diverse range of traits," says Martin.
The twins had previously been asked if their hair was straight, wavy or curly and the lab then sought to match the reports with the 2.5 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) they had mapped on the twins' genomes.
Martin says it was a "Bingo!" moment when the results showed a big hit on chromosome one, right over the trichohyalin gene.
"This is a gene that has been known for well over twenty years as being involved in hair production and it's a gene that sits in the sheath that's around hair root bulbs," says Martin. Forensic tool
There is still more work to be done to determine exactly which variant of the gene influences hair curliness.
Biologically, hair curliness is governed by the distribution of hair keratins and cell types within the hair fibre.
Martin believes that one of the variations which creates an amino acid change, may be the likely candidate.
But, he says it's very difficult to determine exactly how the amino acid works to alter the protein.
"What we do know about curly versus straight hair is that it's very much a biochemical property of the hair root sheath," says Martin.
While it is anticipated that the new knowledge may have implications for the cosmetics industry, it is also likely to help in forensics providing more accurate identification of individuals based on their genes.
_______________________________________
Iron you're like a broken record now, you keep putting up the same photos. Everybody in the world except you knows that there are curly haired white people in the world. Also if you cut the hair short it can be too short for the curls to form. Some people who have curly hair do this if they don't like it to curl or the straighten it artificially. To say that there is no such thing as a curly haired white person is ignorant. Often you can tell it's real because it isn't uniform.
you need to get out more, apparently you haven't seen the world
remember, if you don't like what you see, just say it's fake. That's what a scholar would do. If they see something in history they didn't like just erase it. right?
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
Your source says 15% Albinos a tiny minority of Albinos inherited curly hair probably from their Muurish ancestors. You are a mulatoo nationalist, so you know what I mean.
But the scary part is the other part of you, the 85% who do not have this gene...
The rest 85% well, who are those?
Now, point out the gene responsible for the "brown" skin of the Europeans as the Romans have been shown to be brown and black skinned like olives?
The root of the other 85%: Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
Your source says 15% Albinos a tiny minority of Albinos inherited curly hair probably from their Muurish ancestors. You are a mulatoo nationalist, so you know what I mean.
But the scary part is the other part of you, the 85% who do not have this gene...
The rest 85% well, who are those?
Julius Caesar
Augustus
Claudius
vespasian
Tiberius
Caligula
quote:Originally posted by IronLion:
Now, point out the gene responsible for the "brown" skin of the Europeans as the Romans have been shown to be brown and black skinned like olives?
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: [QB] Lioness - Those people all show obvious Black admixture.
Then they must be related to the people from Etruria. People related to the Romans after 509 BC were predominantly Caucasian as is stated by realhistoryww.com.
As Caucasians kept coming in, Rome soon became a large city, similar to the powerful cities of southern Etruria, and it had also become predominately Caucasian.Accordingly, it was a Caucasian uprising that drove the Etruscans from Rome in 509 B.C.
Maybe realhistoryww.com should be revised to reflect Ironedlion's new findings.
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
By the Roman period, much of the "Greek" population of Faiyum was made-up of either Hellenized Egyptians or people of mixed Egyptian-Greek origins.
While commonly believed to represent Greek settlers in Egypt, the Faiyum portraits instead reflect the complex synthesis of the predominant Egyptian culture and that of the elite Greek minority in the city. According to Walker, the early Ptolemaic Greek colonists married local women and adopted Egyptian religious beliefs, and by Roman times, their descendants were viewed as Egyptians by the Roman rulers, despite their own self-perception of being Greek. The dental morphology of the Roman-period Faiyum mummies was also compared with that of earlier Egyptian populations, and was found to be "much more closely akin" to that of ancient Egyptians than to Greeks or other European populations (Romans).
this is a fairly good match:
it's sad the beating Ironedlion has taken on this thread
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: Romano Moorish Emperor Valentin III
The Colour of the True Romans
Emperor Valentine III Romano-Moorish Brown Boi
Afrika Boi Emperor Aemilian
Moorish Boi Emperor Marcus Aurielus in true colours
Afrika Boi Emperor Severus Alexander
Afrika Roman Brown Empress Galla
Lesson for Lioness
You now know why Romans bleach. Would you bleach your pink arse? Name me the gene which makes your Goth-ed arse "brown" Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
Your source says 15% Albinos a tiny minority of Albinos inherited curly hair probably from their Muurish ancestors. You are a mulatoo nationalist, so you know what I mean.
But the scary part is the other part of you, the 85% who do not have this gene...
The rest 85% well, who are those?
MIX BLOOD: MOORISH/SLAVAS OF ROME:
Julius Caesar
Augustus
Tiberius
Caligula
quote:Originally posted by IronLion:
Now, point out the gene responsible for the "brown" skin of the Europeans as the Romans have been shown to be brown and black skinned like olives?
p53 gene
MIXED BLOOD SUDANESE/BRITISH OF MODERN TIME
Alex Siddig Sudanese/British
Now, point out the gene responsible for the "brown" skin of the Europeans as the Romans have been shown to be brown and black skinned like olives?
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
NB: Septimus Severus was a Numidian African Moor from North Africa. He was the founder and ancestor of all the members of the Severan Dynasty.
Septimus Severus was an African Roman, who attacked Rome with his legion and after the death of the late Emperor and took over the Empire after much struggle.
Septimus Severus army was composed mostly of African Moorish Cavalry troops...all dreadlocks!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
The ancient Roman statues actually look more caucasian than the modern day Italians. Thanks guys. Keep up the good work and keep them coming. Posts: 676 | From: the Alpha and the Omega | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by A Simple Girl: The ancient Roman statues actually look more caucasian than the modern day Italians. Thanks guys. Keep up the good work and keep them coming.
We definitely will keep it up!
RECALL THIS LESSON
Gotha bwoi Justin Timberlake, red straight hair, blue eyes, pale skin
Physical Characteristics of Romano-Moorish type Olive skin, dark wooly to straight hair, black eyes Olive skin
Olive skin
Olive skin
Tacitus is a brown Romano describing the physical attributes of the Gotha.
He says Gotha was albinos originale, red hair, blondies, blue eyes and pale skin... unlike no other nation known to him.
If Romans were albinos with red hair and blue eyes, and pale skin, why then is Tacitus saying here that only Goths look that way?
Romans must have looked very different from Gotha Germanica...read:
quote:Physical Characteristics Gotha/Vandal
"For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany .....like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population.
All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion.
They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them..."
Tacitus
Comments???
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by A Simple Girl: [qb] The ancient Roman statues actually look more caucasian than the modern day Italians. Thanks guys. Keep up the good work and keep them coming.
We definitely will keep it up!
RECALL THIS LESSON
yes RECALL THIS LESSON:
Emperor: Nero
Nero-He was about the average height, his body marked with spots and malodorous, his hair light blond, his features regular rather than attractive, his eyes blue and somewhat weak, his neck over thick, his belly prominent, and his legs very slender.
Augustus: He had clear, bright eyes, in which he liked to have it thought that there was a kind of divine power, and it greatly pleased him, whenever he looked keenly at anyone, if he let his face fall as if before the radiance of the sun; but in his old age he could not see very well with his left eye. His teeth were wide apart, small, and ill-kept; his hair was slightly curly and inclining to golden; his eyebrows met. His ears were of moderate size, and his nose projected a little at the top and then bent slightly inward.110 His complexion was between dark and fair.
.After three Punic wars, finally in 149 BC Rome defeated and destroyed Carthage, North Africa. After Rome emerged victorious, Carthaginian settlements, such as those in Mauritania, were taken over by Roman colonists. then Ironlion bent down and kissed their sandals
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by A Simple Girl: [qb] The ancient Roman statues actually look more caucasian than the modern day Italians. Thanks guys. Keep up the good work and keep them coming.
We definitely will keep it up!
RECALL THIS LESSON
yes RECALL THIS LESSON:
Emperor: Nero
Nero-He was about the average height, his body marked with spots and malodorous, his hair light blond, his features regular rather than attractive, his eyes blue and somewhat weak, his neck over thick, his belly prominent, and his legs very slender.
I went to your source, and it turns out it was a book written in 1914 by a wet-dreaming Albinos Gotha.
J. C. Rolfe, Suetonius, The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, London, 1913-14.
Lyingass gal, you are proving true to type! LoL!
You must be silly to use a ficional work written in 1914, to describe the physical features of Nero who lived in ancient Rome more than 2000 years ago?
Why not use a source from 2000 years ago?
Tacitus was a Roman who lived 2000 years ago.
He wrote that Gothas looked strange because they were albinos with blond and red hair.
Physical Characteristics Gotha/Vandal
"For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany .....like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population.
All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion.
They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them..."
Tacitus
Gothas came from central Asia. At that time they looked ike this:
Gothas
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IronLion: The Moorish African Emperors of Rome
Septimus Severus
NB: Septimus Severus was a Numidian African Moor from North Africa. He was the founder and ancestor of all the members of the Severan Dynasty.
Septimus Severus was an African Roman, who attacked Rome with his legion and after the death of the late Emperor and took over the Empire after much struggle.
Septimus Severus army was composed mostly of African Moorish Cavalry troops...all dreadlocks!
Septimus Severus
After arrivng from Africa and conquering Rome, Septimus spawed a dynasty that lasted for more than 200 years.
Of all the Roman Emperors, he is the most significant because he was the game changer. His reign brought the wake of the imperial epogee of Rome, in terms of geographical expansion.
His children ruled after his death. Then his nephews, then his in-laws, then his cousins.
Septimus Severus, one could say was the greatest Emperor of Rome.
He was from Mauritania. A Numidian by birth.
Brown skin and woolly hair!
Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
Emperor Aemilian was born in the Roman province of Africa. According to the 4th century source Epitome de Caesaribus, he was born at Girba (modern Djerba, an island off the coast of Tunisia) and was a Moor; a reference in the same source hints that he was born around 207.
Epitome de Caesaribus, 31.1–2.
Aemilian Crush the Goths
In 253 the Goths, led by king Cniva, protested not having received the tribute due by the Romans according to the treaty of 251 and crossed the border, attacking Cappadocia, Pessinus, and Ephesus; the opinion of modern historians is that this missing payment was not a change in Roman policy, and the Goths were more likely trying to capitalize on their military prowess.
Aemilian had command of the army assigned to defend the area.
Aemilian exhorted them, reminding them of Roman honour (according to Zosimus) and promising tribute from the Goths (according to Zonaras). The Romans took the Goths by surprise, killing most of them, followed by an invasion of their territory which resulted in booty and the liberation of prisoners.
The Roman soldiers, gathered by Aemilian, acclaimed him Emperor. Jordanes claims, however, that Aemilian's troops plundered Roman territory, rather than keep the tribute of the Goths.
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Lioness - Those people all show obvious Black admixture. If you want to make your point, you must find a Dravidian Albino with curly hair.
Didio Julianus Posts: 7419 | From: North America | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic